Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2021, Australian Outlook, Australian Institute of International Affairs
…
3 pages
1 file
Would there be any difference in the treatment of Rohingya populations if a military government or civilian government ran the state? With Rohingya repatriation serving as a flashpoint of the Myanmar coup, invoking global responsibility to protect this population seems long overdue.
2021
This insight explores the responses of the South Asian states to the coup that took place in Myanmar on 1 February 2021, the resistance movement that followed and the Rohingya crisis which is intertwined with the coup. While there is a recognition that these states need to uphold their democratic norms and ideals in diplomatic statements against the coup, national and realpolitik interests have been prioritised over condemning the military for its violent crackdowns.
This article argues that Rohingyas in Myanmar have been deliberately excluded by its government. The claims of the government and political leaders that Rohingyas are illegal migrants could no way be justified due to the clear fact that they have been a part of long history of Burma. Due to the exclusionary policies, this population group has been systematically marginalized, persecuted, deprived of basic rights, and abused. Available protection space for Rohingya refugees in the region has become extremely volatile due to the reluctance to sign the 1951 Convention and a lack of national legal frameworks in most southeast Asian countries. Despite political pressure from the international community and local activists groups calling for the government to stop the violence, there is no sign to end the violence.
EJIL:Talk! October 2017
This post discusses the recent plight of Myanmar's Rohingya people and suggests a new approach to addressing statelessness in Southeast Asia.
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 2016
This article argues that Rohingyas in Myanmar have been deliberately excluded by its government. The claims of the government and political leaders that Rohingyas are illegal migrants could no way be justified due to the clear fact that they have been a part of long history of Burma. Due to the exclusionary policies, this population group has been systematically marginalized, persecuted, deprived of basic rights, and abused. Available protection space for Rohingya refugees in the region has become extremely volatile due to the reluctance to sign the 1951 Convention and a lack of national legal frameworks in most southeast Asian countries. Despite political pressure from the international community and local activists groups calling for the government to stop the violence, there is no sign to end the violence.
Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal
The notorious violation of the human rights of ethnics in Myanmar has attracted the attention of the international community. Such abuse is threatening the South East Asia peace and security. This article unravels the legal and historical nexus between the Rohingya and Myanmar, supporting their claim for the rights of citizenship. This article suggests a tripartite model of which involves cooperation between the government of Myanmar, ASEAN and, the United Nations. The collective efforts from these three parties are vital to ensure a change in the crisis. Keywords: ASEAN, Human rights, Rohingya, United Nations. eISSN: 2398-4287 © 2020. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers...
Mainstream, 2021
Myanmar emerged as the promising state in the twentieth-century as it not only released Aung San Suu Kyi from house arrest but ushered into political and economic reforms. The adoption of the 2008 Constitution and political and economic reforms brought an end to the military junta rule. The end of the military -junta rule has not ended the influence of the military within the government. While Myanmar is transitioning into a democracy, it is also facing multifaceted challenges on the human rights front. The increased attack and exodus of Rohingyas post-2012 by extremist Rakhine Buddhists and subsequently by the Tatmadaw after the attack by ARSA has been described as the textbook example of ethnic cleansing’ by United Nations. This study seeks to analyze the transformation of Myanmar into a democracy. It will compare the role played by the government of USDP and NLD in dealing with the Rohingya issue. And how has democratization impacted the Rohingya? It argues that change in the government has not brought any major policy changes concerning the Rohingya issue. Moreover, two governments were controlling Myanmar, one is NLD and the other Tatmadaw. This has further complicated the issue and the military ended up carrying out a coup and seizing the power on 1 February 2021 citing election fraud. Keywords: Aung San Suu Kyi, Democratization, Rohingya issue, Tatmadaw, Religious Extremism.
2015
2021
Rohingya people from Myanmar, once called Burma, are an ethnic group from Rakhine State who are a Muslim minority, and have been living for as long as today from their great grandparents can remember. They are a minority considered "the most persecuted minority in the World" by the United Nations. When the British colonization invaded Burma, majority-Buddhist people of the state refused from an independently administered colony and Rohingya served as a threat. (Blakemore, 2019) In 1977, Burma launched Operation Dragon King in Rakhine State, a national effort in registering citizens and to review foreigners in complying with a national consensus. It resulted to force fleeing of about 200,000 Rohingya to Bangladesh, by accusing them of violence mentioning rape and destructions. (MSF, 2019) In 1982, Burma's Government passed a citizenship act recognizing 135 ethnic groups, the Rohingya were not on the list. (Socialist Republic of the union of Burma, 1982) It deprives the Rohingya citizenship of Myanmar and makes them a stateless people. In 1989, Burma was renamed as Myanmar, 250, 000 Rohingyas fled to Bangladesh as military presence in Northern Rakhine state increased, still Rohingya are
Journal of International Studies, 2020
While Myanmar is a multi-ethnic and multi-religious country, the Bamar (Burmese) nonetheless comprise almost 70 percent of the country’s total population. Of the many ethnic groups in Myanmar, the Muslim Rohingya, are mainly centered in the Rakhine (Arakan) State, which borders Bangladesh. Although the position of these people as a distinct ethnic group was recognized by the U Nu government (1948-1962), the introduction of the 1982 Citizenship Act by the country’s military government, however, have rendered them stateless. Subject to a wide range of systematic human rights violations by the Myanmar authorities, the Rohingya have often sought refugee in Bangladesh as well as many other countries in the region and beyond. Whilst most like-minded states and international organizations have duly responded to the issue, especially by providing humanitarian assistance and criticizing the Myanmar junta for its treatment of the Rohingya, however, much remains to be done to find a permanent ...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
İNSAMER Analysis, 2019
Journal of Urban Culture Research, 2017
Politics, Religion & Ideology, 2021
Social Science Review, 2020
Ethnic Studies Review
Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice
The Conversation, 2017
Managing Conflicts in a Globalizing ASEAN: Incompatibility Management Through Good Governance, 2020
Australian Journal of International Affairs, 2020
Modern Diplomacy, 2020
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 2022
Rome, IAI, March 2019, 26 p. (IAI Papers ; 19|07), ISBN 978-88-9368-099-8, 2019
Myanmar: Politics, Economy and Society, 2020