2014, in Pippa Norris et al. (eds) Advancing Electoral Integrity
Understanding the causes, consequences, and remedies for defects in the practice of elections is being subjected to renewed scrutiny. Considerable attention has focused on how elections are subverted by elites seeking to maintain power. Scholars have established a comprehensive menu of manipulation including electoral violence, vote buying, and maintaining favorable electoral laws. 1 This has been conceptualized as electoral malpractice 2 or as undermining international standards of electoral integrity. 3 Not all flaws in elections are the direct result of the partisan activity of elites and their agents, however. In Electoral Malpractice, Birch notes that systems of electoral administration can be prone to 'electoral mispractice'-"incompetence, lack of resources, unforeseen disturbances, and simple human error" 4 -but then focuses on the deliberate "manipulation of electoral processes and outcomes. " 5 Elsewhere, Norris notes that elections can be plagued by 'electoral maladministration': "routine flaws and unintended mishaps by election officials . . . due to managerial failures, inefficiency and incompetence. " 6 These problems can affect voter confidence and threaten democratic consolidation. However, previous accounts have not offered sufficient conceptual disaggregation or empirical research to help establish the types, causes, and potential remedies for such problems.