Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2016, Revue roumaine de philosophie
…
12 pages
1 file
The paper critically examines C.G. Jung's concept of synchronicity and its implications for scientific inquiry. It argues that traditional scientific experimentation, characterized by restrictive conditions, limits our understanding of nature, proposing that a broader, more open-ended method of inquiry is necessary to attain a more comprehensive grasp of reality. Additionally, it contextualizes Jung’s ideas within the metaphysical debates of modern physics, suggesting that a reevaluation of causality may provide insight for a more holistic interpretation of the universe.
Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2004
New Essays in Logic and Philosophy of Science (M. D’Agostino, G. Giorello, F. Laudisa, T. Pievani, C. Sinigaglia, eds.), 2010
Philosophy of Science, 1997
The Routledge companion to the philosophy of science, 2008
A piece that has been through numerous transformations at various conferences, most notably as a keynote address to the 2011 Danish STS conference (DASTS), Aarhus, May. An attempt to come to terms with the experimental tradition in psychology by reinscribing experiments to a different register (i.e. theatre and art). A sort of practical application of the thinking in Psychology Without Foundations.
2015
In this paper we argue for a new role for experiment in science teaching and learning. Our proposition is based on the conception of experiment as an active ingredient of theory construction and not as a mere tool for theory testing. This latter view is based on the classical conception of the mind-world interaction, according to which human action purports to test the validity of a tentative solution to a problem and follows after mental processing. We present the new framework that views the interactions with the environment as active ingredients of the mind’s problem solving activity. We also adduce evidence for this new role of experiment from the history of science. Finally, we discuss the repercussions of this view of cognition, as the activity of a mind-environment inseparable whole for the role of experiment in knowledge
1997
The biological sciences are changing the ways in which we understand ourselves Biological Being is a philosophical exploration of biology, mapping some of the features of the field that make it so important in generating these changes Two central themes are at the heart of this exploration: biology is a science that should be grasped from a realist position, and it is a science that reveals a disunified, pluralistic world of kinds of things. After an introduction of some the issues involved, in three substantial chapters these themes are unpacked and analysed. The first major chapter is about experimentation and biology. In it the experimental realism of Hacking is rejected, whilst the core notion of intervention and manipulation of the world as a vital epistemic tool is retained. Similarities and differences between experiments in the physical and biological science are investigated. This comparison is continued in the second major chapter, which is about natural kinds and biology’...
From: Observation and Experimentation in Science: New methodological perspectives, ed. W. González.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Philosophical Psychology, 2010
Manuscrito, 2011
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
The Cambridge Handbook of Analytic Philosophy, 2022
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21(5): 787-791, 2013
The Reasoner, 2012
Philosophical Explorations, 2007
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2010
annual convention of the Mid-South Philosophical …
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 1998
The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments, edited by Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach Fehige and James Robert Brown
Automated Experimentation, 2009
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2009