Academia.eduAcademia.edu

In Behalf of 'In Behalf of the Fool'

1982, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

AI-generated Abstract

The paper critiques Hartshorne's argument regarding the concept of a 'necessarily-existing island,' asserting that the notion is self-contradictory since islands are contingent entities. It challenges Hartshorne's lack of support for the idea that all islands must be contingent and argues that the ontological argument's premises are as arbitrary as those proposed in parody. By analyzing various parodies of the ontological argument, the paper concludes that the rational acceptability of theism does not hold any stronger justification than belief in fanciful concepts.