Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Review of Studies in Isaiah by Wasserman et al JHS

AI-generated Abstract

This review article evaluates recent scholarly contributions to the study of the Book of Isaiah, focusing on three key essays that tackle distinct theological and critical issues. H. G. M. Williamson critiques Hermann Barth's Josianic redaction hypothesis, offering new analysis that undermines its foundational premises. Antti Laato explores Zion theology, positing that early Isaiah centered on deliverance rather than judgment, while Stefan Green examines the relationship between prophetic and apocalyptic perspectives in Isaiah 65-66 and 1 Enoch, suggesting a significant historical temple crisis. Each contribution enriches the understanding of Isaiah's themes and methodologies.