Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
AI
This chapter explores the critical linkages between climate change and human migration, highlighting the potential for large-scale population displacements due to rising sea levels, prolonged droughts, and extreme weather events. It aims to address fundamental questions regarding the expected number, timing, and demographic characteristics of climate migrants, as well as the regions impacted. The authors discuss current knowledge gaps and the implications of climate-related migration for international security and policymaking.
ak-geomorphologie.de
Evidence of the effect of external influences on the climate system has continued to accumulate since the TAR. There is widespread evidence of anthropogenic warming of the climate system in temperature observations taken at the surface, in the free atmospheric and in the oceans. It is very likely that greenhouse gas forcing has been the dominant cause of the observed global warming over the last 50 years, and it is likely that greenhouse gases alone would have caused more warming than has been observed during this period, with some warming offset by cooling from natural and other anthropogenic factors. It is highly likely (>95%) that warming during the past half century cannot be explained without external forcing, or based on known natural external causes alone. The warming occurred in both oceans and atmosphere, and took place at a time when non-anthropogenic external forcing factors would likely have produced cooling. Studies that attribute warming to greenhouse gas forcing rely on a range of observational data sets, variables, climate models and methods. Anthropogenic warming has now been detected on continental and sub-continental scales in a range of studies, and evidence is emerging that surface temperature extremes have likely been affected. In addition, anthropogenic influence is becoming apparent in other parts of the climate system. While many uncertainties remain, the physical consistency of the many different lines of evidence increases our confidence in the conclusion that anthropogenic forcing has caused substantial change in the climate system over the past century. Human-induced warming of the climate system is widespread. Anthropogenic warming of the climate system can be detected in temperature observations taken at the surface, in the free atmosphere and in the oceans. Multi-signal detection and attribution analyses, which quantify the contributions of different natural and anthropogenic forcings to observed changes, show that greenhouse gas forcing during the past half century would likely have resulted in greater warming than observed if there had not been an offsetting cooling effect from aerosol and other forcings. This conclusion takes into account observational and forcing uncertainty, and is robust to the use of different climate models, different methods for estimating the responses to external forcing, and variations in the analysis technique. Further evidence has accumulated of an anthropogenic influence on the temperature of the free atmosphere since widespread radiosonde measurements started in the late 1950s. The observed pattern of tropospheric warming and stratospheric cooling is very likely due to the influence of anthropogenic forcing, particularly greenhouse gases and stratospheric ozone depletion. The combination of a warming troposphere and a cooling stratosphere has likely led to an increase in the height of the tropopause. It is likely that anthropogenic forcing has contributed to the observed warming of the upper several hundred meters of the ocean during the latter half of the 20th century. Anthropogenic forcing, resulting in thermal expansion from ocean warming and glacier and ice sheet melt, is likely the largest contributor to sea level rise during the latter half 20th century. Anthropogenic influence is now detectable in regional surface temperatures. The anthropogenic signal in surface temperature changes has now likely been detected in all inhabited continents and many subcontinental land areas. The ability of models to simulate the temperature evolution on these scales and the detection of anthropogenic effects on individual continents provides stronger evidence of human influence on the global climate than was available to the TAR. Evidence of anthropogenic influence on surface temperature extremes is emerging. Surface temperature extremes have likely been affected by anthropogenic forcing. Many indicators of impact-relevant surface temperatures, including the annual numbers of frost days, warm days and cold days, show changes consistent with warming. Anthropogenic influence has been detected in some of these indices, and there is evidence that anthropogenic forcing may have substantially increased the risk of extremely warm summer conditions regionally, such as the 2003 European heat wave. Anthropogenic influence is becoming apparent in other parts of the climate system. Anthropogenic forcing has likely contributed to recent decreases in Arctic sea ice extent. There is evidence of a decreasing trend in global snow cover and widespread retreat of glaciers, consistent with warming, and evidence that this melting has also likely contributed to sea-level rise. Trends in the Northern and Southern Annular Modes over recent decades, which correspond to sea level pressure reductions over the poles, are likely related in part to human activity. Models reproduce the sign of the Northern Annular Mode trend, but the simulated response is smaller than observed. Models including Do Not Cite or Quote 9-3 Total pages: 98 Second-Order Draft Chapter 9 IPCC WG1 Fourth Assessment Report both greenhouse gas and stratospheric ozone changes simulate a realistic trend in the Southern Annular Mode, leading to a detectable human influence on global sea level pressure. The response to volcanic forcing simulated by some models is detectable in global annual mean land precipitation during the latter half of the 20th century. Observed, large scale changes in land precipitation over the 20th century appear to be qualitatively consistent simulations of the 20th century, suggestive of a possible human influence. Observed increases in heavy precipitation appear to be consistent with increases that are expected to occur with warming, although it is unclear whether these changes are distinguishable from natural variability. The observed increase in the proportion of very intense hurricanes is the same direction but not magnitude as suggested by theoretical studies and modelling stuidies of projected 21st century change. Inadequacies in process knowledge and understanding of natural variability, modelling, and monitoring of tropical cyclones inhibit attribution to anthropogenic factors. Proxy climate data have been used to increase confidence in models and the role of external influences on climate. Coupled climate models used to predict future climate have been used to understand past climatic conditions such as those of the Last Glacial Maximum and the Mid-Holocene. While many aspects of these past climates are still uncertain, climate models are successful in reproducing their broad features when forced with boundary conditions and radiative forcing for those periods. A large fraction of Northern Hemisphere interdecadal temperature variability in reconstructions of the past 7 centuries is very likely attributable to natural external forcing. Furthermore, the 20th century warming evident in these records, most of which end by the mid-20th century, is likely due in part to anthropogenic forcing. Estimates of the climate sensitivity are now better constrained by observations. Estimates of the equilibrium climate sensitivity and the transient climate response, their uncertainties and the ability of observable quantities to constrain them are now better understood. The equilibrium climate sensitivity is likely 2 to 4.5°C, with a most likely value of approximately 3°C, although the upper limit remains difficult to constrain from observations. The transient climate response is better constrained and is unlikely to be greater than 2.8°C at the time of CO 2 doubling in response to a 1% per year increase in CO 2. Overall consistency of evidence. Although uncertainties remain, many observed changes in the climate over the 20th century are distinct from internal variability and consistent with the expected response to anthropogenic forcing. This consistency is apparent in many observations, including surface and free atmospheric temperature, ocean temperature and sea-ice extent, some large scale features of the atmospheric circulation. The simultaneous increase in energy content of all the major components of the climate system supports the conclusion that the cause of the warming is highly unlikely (<5%) to be the result of internal processes. Qualitative consistency is also apparent in some other observations, including snow cover, glacier retreat, and heavy precipitation. Remaining uncertainties. Further improved models and analysis techniques have increased confidence in the understanding of the influence of external forcing on climate since the TAR. However, estimates of some radiative forcings remain uncertain, including aerosol forcing and inter-decadal variations in solar forcing. However, the robustness of surface temperature attribution results to forcing and response uncertainty has been evaluated with a range of models, forcing representations and analysis procedures. The potential impact of the remaining uncertainties has been considered, to the extent possible, in the overall assessment of every line of evidence listed above.. There is less confidence in the understanding of forced changes in other variables, such as surface pressure and precipitation. The extent to which uncertainties in observations, forcing and model formulation contribute to a lack of quantitative agreement is not presently understood. The detection and attribution of external influences is performed by comparing observed changes against those that could plausibly arise from natural internal variability. Improvements in models and instrumental and proxy climate records have increased confidence in climate model simulated internal variability. However, uncertainty remains because the available observational records are influenced by external forcing, are often too short to provide accurate estimates of decadal and longer time scale variability, and some have inadequate spatial coverage and accuracy. While reduced,...
International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2019
Climate Change, 2024
(irip) REVISITING CLIMATE CHANGE AN OVERVIEW CLIMATE CHANGE IS ONE OF THE DEFINING ISSUES OF OUR TIME. It is now more certain than ever, based on many lines of evidence, that humans are changing Earth's climate. The atmosphere and oceans have warmed, which has been accompanied by sea level rise, a strong decline in Arctic sea ice, and other climate-related changes. The impacts of climate change on people and nature are increasingly apparent. Unprecedented flooding, heat waves, and wildfires have cost billions in damages. Habitats are undergoing rapid shifts in response to changing temperatures and precipitation patterns.
Theory, Culture & Society, 2010
Global climate change and coastal tourism: recognizing problems, managing solutions and future expectations
Global Policy, 2014
This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving. Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.
2018
Many different scientific observations and measurements indicate that Earth is experiencing global-scale changes in climate, i.e., in the long-term distributions of temperature, cloud cover, precipitation, and extreme weather events. Scientific consensus considers most these changes to be caused or accelerated by human activities. The economic, ecological, social, and cultural challenges caused by global climate change will affect everyone on the planet, and are very likely to have disproportionate impacts on developing nations. In this course, we will study global climate change from an interdisciplinary perspective, incorporating natural and social science approaches to understanding processes and effects. We will study the socioeconomic contexts of environmental effects and how globally diverse cultural perspectives influence strategies to mitigate and adapt to climate change. A note about this course (Team SJSU Studies): This is a year-long course: 6 units (CEGHM 168A) in Fall and 3 units (CEGHM 168B) in Spring. You will receive credit for GE Areas R, S, and V after you have successfully completed the entire year-long sequence. In order to receive GE credit, you must receive a grade of C or higher in both semesters. If you receive a grade of C-or lower in 168A, you will not be able to enroll in 168B. A grade of C-or lower in 168A will not earn any GE credit. This course is team-taught. We meet for extended class periods. We will cover a lot of material on numerous topics and engage in various activities related to global climate change and the SJSU Studies learning objectives. Assignments, readings, class activities and discussions are designed to help you
Climate Change. Evidence and Causes, 2023
Climate change is one of the defining issues of our times. It is now more certain than ever, based on many lines of evidence, that humans are changing Earth's climate. The atmosphere and oceans have warmed, which has been accompanied by sea level rise, a strong decline in Arctic sea ice, and other climate-related changes. The impacts of climate change on people and nature are increasingly apparent. Unprecedented flooding, heat waves, and wildfires have cost billions in damages. Habitats are undergoing rapid shifts in response to changing temperatures and precipitation patterns. The Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences, with their similar missions to promote the use of science to benefit society and to inform critical policy debates, produced the original Climate Change: Evidence and Causes in 2014. It was written and reviewed by a UK-US team of leading climate scientists. This new edition, prepared by the same author team, has been updated with the most recent climate data and scientific analyses, all of which reinforce our understanding of human-caused climate change. The evidence is clear. However, due to the nature of science, not every detail is ever totally settled or certain. Nor has every pertinent question yet been answered. Scientific evidence continues to be gathered around the world. Some things have become clearer and new insights have emerged. For example, the period of slower warming during the 2000s and early 2010s has ended with a dramatic jump to warmer temperatures between 2014 and 2015. Antarctic sea ice extent, which had been increasing, began to decline in 2014, reaching a record low in 2017 that has persisted. These and other recent observations have been woven into the discussions of the questions addressed in this booklet. Calls for action are getting louder. The 2020 Global Risks Perception Survey from the World Economic Forum ranked climate change and related environmental issues as the top five global risks likely to occur within the next ten years. Yet, the international community still has far to go in showing increased ambition on mitigation, adaptation, and other ways to tackle climate change. Scientific information is a vital component for society to make informed decisions about how to reduce the magnitude of climate change and how to adapt to its impacts. This booklet serves as a key reference document for decision makers, policy makers, educators, and others seeking authoritative answers about the current state of climate-change science. We are grateful that six years ago, under the leadership of Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone, former President of the National Academy of Sciences, and Sir Paul Nurse, former President of the Royal Society, these two organizations partnered to produce a highlevel overview of climate change science. As current Presidents of these organizations, we are pleased to offer an update to this key reference, supported by the generosity of the Cicerone family.
Nature and Culture, 2007
Not too long ago, concerns about changing climate were relegated to the realm of academia and the laboratories of meteorologists, oceanographers, and atmospheric scientists. However now the debate has reached not only the open forums of world politics and policy makers, it has trickled down to the household level through popular media such as science fiction novels and Hollywood films. At the risk of making a bad pun, climate change is a hot topic. As we collectively scrutinize changing climate in the modern world, and its projected effect on the societies that exist today, there is a natural curiosity among the informed public about the state of the climate in the past, the magnitude of these current changes vis-à-vis past fluctuations in climate, and how these might have impacted some of the ancient societies that preceded ours. As a result there have been a number of recent books, for the most part written by geographers and climate scientists, that explain the workings of the world climate in a way that is comprehensible to the educated public.
2010
In the 18th and 19th century western thinkers spend enormous intellectual energy to argue about the climatic determinants of the civilizational peculiarities of entire nations. There was an endless number of writers who ascribe supreme efficacy to climate. Nearly all aspects and processes of human life were tied to climatic causes In the face of climate change this historically discredited doctrine of climatic determinism has experienced a renaissance. Scholarly literature, media coverage and public discourse of climate change tend to portray it as a single, independent phenomenon or set of phenomena that directly causes other events to happen and is therefore thematically and methodically related to historical climatic determinism. This essay argues that this mode of thought builds on problematic assumption of the relationship between climate and society. Drawing on numerous examples it examines the roots and contemporary forms, as well as the theoretical and political presumptions of climatic determinism, paying particular attention to the development of academic geography.
Climatic Change, 2006
Historic discussions of climate often suggested that it caused societies to have certain qualities. In the 19th-century, imperial representations of the world environment frequently “determined” the fate of peoples and places, a practice that has frequently been used to explain the largest patterns of political rivalry and the fates of empires and their struggles for dominance in world politics. In the 21st century, climate change has mostly reversed the causal logic in the reasoning about human–nature relationships and their geographies. The new thinking suggests that human decisions, at least those made by the rich and powerful with respect to the forms of energy that are used to power the global economy, are influencing future climate changes. Humans are now shaping the environment on a global scale, not the other way around. Despite the widespread acceptance of the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate-change action, numerous arguments about who should act and how they should do so to deal with climate change shape international negotiations. Differing viewpoints are in part a matter of geographical location and whether an economy is dependent on fossil-fuels revenue or subject to increasingly severe storms, droughts, or rising sea levels. These differences have made climate negotiations very difficult in the last couple of decades. Partly in response to these differences, the Paris Agreement devolves primary responsibility for climate policy to individual states rather than establish any other geopolitical arrangement. Apart from the outright denial that humanity is a factor in climate change, arguments about whether climate change causes conflict and how security policies should engage climate change also partly shape contemporary geopolitical agendas. Despite climate-change deniers, in the Trump administration in particular, in the aftermath of the Paris Agreement, climate change is understood increasingly as part of a planetary transformation that has been set in motion by industrial activity and the rise of a global fossil-fuel-powered economy. But this is about more than just climate change. The larger earth-system science discussion of transformation, which can be encapsulated in the use of the term “Anthropocene” for the new geological circumstances of the biosphere, is starting to shape the geopolitics of climate change just as new political actors are beginning to have an influence on climate politics.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.