Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2019, Pacific Affairs
https://doi.org/10.5509/2019923515…
9 pages
1 file
AI
The paper examines the evolution and effectiveness of regionalism in Asia, particularly focusing on the role of ASEAN in fostering economic growth and political stability. It highlights the interplay of geopolitical factors and economic policies that influence the region's development trajectory. Despite some advancements in economic integration, the overall impact of regional initiatives is questioned, emphasizing the need for critical reassessment of the outcomes and objectives of Asian regionalism.
The ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration focuses on topics relating to regional cooperation and integration in the areas of infrastructure and software, trade and investment, money and finance, and regional public goods. The Series is a quick-disseminating, informal publication that seeks to provide information, generate discussion, and elicit comments. Working papers published under this Series may subsequently be published elsewhere. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. The Asian Development Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. Use of the term "country" does not imply any judgment by the authors or the Asian Development Bank as to the legal or other status of any territorial entity.
Journal of Asian Economics, 1995
Review by Menzie Chinn Recent years have witnessed a burgeoning interest in East Asia and Pacific Basin economic relations. In gathering together a collection of articles dealing with the diffuse topic of Asia-Pacific regionalism, Ross Gamaut and Peter Drysdale, two long-time scholars in the field, have done the profession a great service. The editors state in the preface that "[tlhese readings will make the Asia-Pacific literature on regionalism accessible to the large community of people who now recognize the importance of Asia-Pacific regionalism: economists, business people, government officials, and participants..." I believe the book is mostly successful in reaching this goal, particularly in bridging the gap between academic discourse and policy analysis. About half of the papers are quantitative in nature, containing either descriptive statistics or reporting the results of statistical analyses. Almost all of the authors are academic economists, but there are a smattering of non-economists and government officials. After an introductory chapter by the editors, the book is divided into 10 parts. Since there is a large number of articles (30), a comprehensive summary and evaluation is infeasible. In order to focus fully on the central issue of Asia-Pacific integration, I will restrict the discussion to those articles examining the Asia-Pacific region as a whole. Section 1 sets up the theoretical underpinnings for the subsequent discussion of regionalism, starting with Richard Cooper's classic article "Worldwide Regional Integration: Is There an Optimal Size of the Integrated Area?" He points out that since the optimal trading region is the world, arguments for regionalism must be based on the provision of collective goods. The relevance of the paper is limited, as it is not clear what public goods are currently being provided in Asia-Pacific regional arrangements. However, the provision of public goods is likely to become a more
Since the start of the Association of South East Asian Nation (ASEAN) Plus Three (APT) initiative in 1997, East Asian regionalism seems to have progressed and an East Asian Community is just around the corner. In spite of all the pessimism brought about by the 1997 Asian financial crisis, East Asian political frameworks are in place, East Asian regional production networks are the most integrated in the world, and regional financial initiatives have taken off. From a financial integration, financial regulation, and education perspective, however, East Asian regionalism has either stagnated or even regressed. Furthermore, US re-engagement in the region and the increased tension over the South China seas tend to challenge further developments in East Asian regionalization outside of the economic space. This paper is a mini-scoping study to present the realities that East Asian regionalism is still lap-sided: economic regionalism is highly developed, while other key components (regional financial and financial regulation integration, education collaboration, and a regional political framework) are developing at a slower rate, stagnating, and/or regressing. It aims to present the reality of East Asian regionalism, provoke awareness of false perspectives, and present a recommendation towards a balanced and more sustainable East Asian regionalism and the formation of a real East Asian community.
Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 2017
The largely unexpected election of Donald Trump as President of the United States has overturned many assumptions and expectations about the future of Australia's regional relationships. Even before Trump's election, however, the history of regional evolution in East Asia presented a number of striking paradoxes and raised important questions about the forces that encourage or obstruct integration and cooperation at the regional level. For a region that has frequently been associated with comparatively limited cross-border political institutionalization and development, East Asia has recently been the centre of a large number of initiatives and proposals that are intended to give expression to particular visions of the region. We argue that the outcome of such regional processes is profoundly influenced by both geo-economic and geopolitical forces. We illustrate this claim by looking at the history of institutional development in the 'Asia-Pacific', before considering the attempt to create a new 'Indo-Pacific region', which, we suggest, has more to do with contemporary geopolitical concerns rather than any underlying 'natural' coherence. The Australian policy-making community needs to think carefully about the implications of the Trump presidency for such initiatives.
2020
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI's working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms o...
Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 2006
Through reviewing South-East Asia's recent economic engagement with the global economy, this paper points to profound recent transformations in the scope and character of the region's development. Foreign direct investment was the key driver of regional growth in the pre-1997 period, yet currently, the region faces a more difficult and multifaceted economic arena from which to attract such funds. Foreign direct investment is more selective, both geographically and by sector, than was the case in that earlier period. This paper explains the confluence of economics, business practices and politics that are giving rise to these outcomes, and concludes from this that development trajectories in South-East Asia will become more diverse between the countries of the region, with implications for how we understand regional economic performance.
Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 2015
Strategic alliance between China Development Bank and Barclays as a basis for the expansion of Chinese capital in the banking sector / Partnerstwo strategiczne China Development Bank i Barclays podstawą ekspansji kapitału chińskiego w sektorze bankowym ................ Małgorzata Dziembała: The significance of social innovation in promoting inclusive growth in Asian countries / Znaczenie innowacji społecznych w promowaniu rozwoju sprzyjającego włączeniu społecznemu w krajach
Review of International Political Economy, 2003
The financial crises of the late 1990s marked an intellectual watershed for the global economy, and also for regionalism as the Janus face of globalisation. At the beginning of the 21 st century, the theory and practice of regional cooperation and integration may evolve along different lines to how it was understood for most of the second half of the 20 th century. In East Asia, in particular, this will mean that the relationship between multilateralism and regionalism will change. The 'East Asian' region will become an increasingly important domain within which to explore enhanced protection against financial crises. What we might call 'monetary regionalism', sceptical western voices notwithstanding, is now firmly on the regional agenda in East Asia.
Review of International Studies, 2009
East Asia has emerged over the last decade as the most active site for the negotiation of regional inter-governmental collaboration. The primary focus has been on trade but, in the wake of the financial crises, governments have also engaged in historically unprecedented collaboration in several areas of finance. Multiple factors have driven this new regional engagement. Although the agreements have been primarily economic in their focus, the primary motivation for many of them has been to secure diplomatic or strategic gains. The aggregate benefits from the agreements are likely to be limited given the low levels of tariffs and the availability of provisions that facilitate the intra-regional exchange of components. They may, however, be of significant interest to producers of specific products either because they provide advantage over competitors (or remove the advantage that competitors through agreements that their governments have signed). The trade agreements thus often reflec...
Asian journal of social science, 2008
21st centry Political Science Review, 2007
for inviting me to the conference. I would also like to thank Rodolfo Severino and Carolina G. Hernandez, as well as the conference participants, for their insightful comments and suggestions on my earlier paper. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI's working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication.
Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 2010
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.