Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2013, Journal of Art and Civilization of the orient (JACO)
"Upanishads", also called "Vedanta" or "end of Veda", refers to the end of "Vedas". According to the classification of Hindu sacred works, Upanishads are supplementary writings attached to "Aranyaka". Based on Hindu traditions, the wise people and receivers of the Divine Commandments were the creators of Upanishads. These people, who were called "Caviya Satiya Sarvata", used to live deep in untouched and dark jungles of India where they meditated and studied their own self. They expressed the spiritual experiences inspired to them (by the Divine Source) and flowed within their souls, in the form of Wahdat al-Wujud (Unity of Existence), decorated them with the dressing of mysterious words, and formed them as compressed synthetic ideas. The era of jungle-life was started with the theses of "Aranyaka" and ended with Upanishads, a period which can metaphorically be called the education period in the depth of jungle. According to Max Muller's theory, Upanishads are the oral teachings of masters (morshids) to their close followers. It must be noted that most of the prominent theoretical schools in India and even in Buddhism have originated from Upanishads. With regard to the main subject in "Upanishads", the present paper tries to establish the specific spirituality, self-purification and the unique truth of the ancient India.
The Upanishads which together form Vedanta have always been an interesting study, particularly by those who cherish spirituality. Although commonly called Hindu scriptures, they never ever deal with Hinduism. They deal with the universal themes : what is Truth or Reality; what is the relation between the creation and its creator; what is the nature of the creator; how man can overcome existential problems; how man can lead a happy life without fear of death, the greatest fear. The Upanishads teach that men can be happy once they realize the Truth and their inner essence. Happiness results from Knowledge - the Knowledge of Reality. This Knowledge is different from sensory knowledge but can be attained through steadfast pursuit - through discrimination and contemplation.
Upanishads" 1 , also called "Vedanta" 2 or-end of Veda‖, refers to the end of "Vedas" 3. According to the classification of Hindu sacred works, Upanishads are supplementary writings attached to "Aranyaka" 4. Based on Hindu traditions, the wise people and receivers of the Divine Commandments were the creators of Upanishads. These people, who were called "Caviya Satiya Sarvata" 5 , used to live deep in untouched and dark jungles of India where they meditated and studied their own self. They expressed the spiritual experiences inspired to them (by the Divine Source) and flowed within their souls, in the form of Wahdat al-Wujud (Unity of Existence), decorated them with the dressing of mysterious words, and formed them as compressed synthetic ideas. The era of jungle-life was started with the theses of "Aranyaka" and ended with Upanishads, a period which can metaphorically be called the education period in the depth of jungle. According to Max Muller's theory, Upanishads are the oral teachings of masters (morshids) to their close followers. It must 8 Farzaneh Azam Lotfi be noted that most of the prominent theoretical schools in India and even in Buddhism have originated from Upanishads. With regard to the main subject in "Upanishads", the present paper tries to establish the specific spirituality, self-purification and the unique truth of the ancient India.
A Companion to World Literature, 2019
In the context of Indian classical literature, the Upanishads (Upanisads) hold a particularly important place for both those within the Hindu tradition and for scholars of early Indian religious history and literature. For many Hindus, the Upanishads are viewed as the intellectual culmination of the Vedic sacrificial tradition that preceded them and become known as veda ̄nta (lit. “end of the Veda”), texts that serve as root texts for some of the classi-cal Indian philosophical schools (darshana [dars ́ana]) that developed several centuries later. From a historical perspective, the Upanishads mark a shift away from the ritual tradition of the Vedas when newly developed notions of karma, asceticism, mental training or yoga,and moksha (moksa, “liberation”) begin to coexist and then – along with devotional (bhakti) trends – supplant the previously dominant sacrificial worldview. While many Hindus see a fundamental continuity in Vedic and Upanishadic thinking, religious and literary historians tend to see the Upanishads as having greater affinity with later Hinduism than with the earlier elite and technical ritual milieu. But even if we assume the position of the latter, it should always be remembered that the composers of the earliest Upanishads were of the same priestly families enacting and producing the Vedas; they assume its framework and validity. Along with an ideological shift, the emergence of the Upanishads also marks a significant material shift, reflecting the settling of formerly nomadic peoples in towns and cities along the Gangetic plain, where changes in material conditions can be seen in the texts themselves. In the context of “world literature,” however, the Upanishads might – at least initially – seem to be something of an uncomfortable fit. Setting aside the fact that such designations often carry preconceived notions of ethnic origin and/or modern understandings of the nation-state, the Upanishads as literature – both individually and collectively as a genre – are an amalgam rather than a unity. This is not to say that there are not certain stylistic, linguistic, and especially thematic continuities across the Upanishads which give the broader contours of a genre. There are, as I will discuss below. But it is to say that there is no single style, character, author, theme, or narrative that any single text, let alone the genre, adheres to. Rather it is a series of overlapping concerns about the nature of the cosmos, the role of the human being both within and beyond that cosmos (i.e. transcendence or liberation), and especially various conceptual strategies through which to explore these concerns that can be seen as loosely constituting a genre. If we take “world literature” as primarily designating a type of literary production that is both novel in form and content and enduring in impact and importance (whether literary, social, or religious), then the Upanishads most certainly qualify as one of the most significant contributions from the ancient subcontinent.
Journal of Religion and Theology, 2019
But the word "Vedanta" is composed of two parts, "Veda and Aneth", meaning the end of the Vedas, meaning the mystical teachings of the Vedas, or, in other words, Upanishads
This self of mine that lies deep within my heart -it is smaller than a grain of rice or barley, smaller than a mustard seed, smaller even than a millet grain or a millet kernel; but it is larger than the earth, larger than the intermediate region, larger than the sky, larger even than all these worlds put together.' (Chàndogya Upaniùad 3.14.
isara solutions, 2023
Veda means Knowledge. Any knowledge we accept is Veda. Vedic knowledge is divided into two folds in accordance with the text of the Ishu-Upanishad. One is knowledge for material world and other is knowledge that contains the Brahmavidya. Meterial knowledge is always in defects or falls. But real knowledge or Brahmavidya is always in perfect mode; it brings happiness for all. The Upanishad represents the sublime thought and highest philosophy found in Hinduism. Upanishads which form part of the Vedas are the real foundations of Hinduism. The Upanishads are the concluding portions of the Vedas. Hence, they are called Vedanta or the End of the Vedas. They represent the essence of the wisdom that is embedded. They are the gist and the gold of the Vedas. They are the finest flower of the Vedic thought. The relationship between the Vedas and the Upanishads is like the relationship between the Old Testament and the New Testament. The influence of the Upanishads on Indian thought, philosophy and way of life can't be exaggerated. The teaching of Upanishads has a great relevance to the modern world. Prof. Hume asserts that the Upanishads of great present day importance. The teaching of Upanishad's is required to counter the influence of materiality which is the common enemy of the modern world. The Vedantic concept is that all human beings because of their shared spirituality are members of a single extended family. The Upanishad phrase "Amritasya putrah" refers to human beings "Children of immortality". This has given rise to the much praised concept of "Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam" one extended family of humanity". The Upanishadic test refers as "Ayamatma Brahma", this self is as Brahma, Manduyka Upanishad. The famous Rig-Vedic pronouncement "Ekam sat viprah bahuva vadanti, the truth is one, the wise called it by many names". The Mundaka Upanishad has a mantra which states that-Akashat Patitam tuiam, Jatha Gachati Sagaram, Sarva Deva Namaskaram, Keshavam Pratigachati-meaning-all streams and rivers arise in different parts of the world but flow into the same ocean, So all creeds, castes and religions that arise in different times and areas, if they have a true aspiration ultimately reach the same goal. All these texts of the Vedas are related to the modern concepts of humanity, secularism education, political concepts, human rights, multiculturalism, globalization, fraternity nonviolence, social equality, tolerance liberty, economic austerity etc. so these papers would discuss about the relevance of the teaching of Vedas and Upanishad in modern society.
2020
This article explores the mystical convergence<br> between advaita and theosis. Five elements of the<br> Upanishadic advaitic tradition are located fi rst: the Divine <br> as mystery, and as the ultimate subject, the divinisation of<br> the human, the immanence of the Divine in cosmos, and<br> the resultant freedom. Then the three-fold dimension of the<br> divine consciousness of Jesus is articulated: being sent by<br> the Father, being in the Father and being one with the Father.<br> John´s Gospel shows that Jesus wanted to communicate<br> this threefold experience to us. This is what Church<br> Fathers called theosis, the divinisation of the human; this<br> is a birthing process. Having explained the terms advaita<br> and theosis, the convergence and divergence between the <br> two are explored. The article concludes with the proposal<br> that Hindus and Christians could move on as spiritual<br&...
Studies in World Christianity 5 (1999): 101-3
Book Reviews 101 contains so much material which is so easy to access and to absorb. I particularly enjoyed the lively and superbly sustained discussion of the significance of trees in early Ireland and also in the various biblical contexts with which Dr Low draws parallels. This rich, well written and enjoyabe book invites close reading but also close thinking. It is likely to stimulate much debate along the lines of this review, particularly when other scholars use and examine the evidence which Dr Low has assembled in such a helpful and accessible manner.
2016
Vajrasucika-Upanisad is a more recent text, belonging to the line of the Sama-Veda. The text demolishes all the religious claims of any phenomenal condition, arguing that spiritual pre-eminence is reached only through the direct realization of the ultimate reality (Brahman) as own-identity (atman). The last paragraph of the text offers a presentation of this ultimate reality and of the condition reached by the one who gets dissolved into it. Keywords: Indian religion, Brahmanism, Vajrasucika, Upanisad, caste-system, Brahman, liberated one.
Philosophy is a subject which does not concerned only to an expert or specialist. It appears that there is probably no human being who does not philosophise. Good philosophy expands one's imagination as some philosophy is close to us, whoever we are. Then of course some is further away, and some is further still, and some is very alien indeed. We raise questions about the assumptions, presuppositions, or definitions upon which a field of inquiry is based, and these questions can be concerned with the meaning, significance, or integration of the results discovered or proposed by a field of inquiry. We find Karmic, Bhaktic and Jnanic interpretations of an ancient text in Indian philosophy because of different approaches adopted to inquire the text. This paper is an attempt to draw an outline of Upanishadic methods of inquiry in Indian philosophical tradition. Several methods like Enigmatic, Aphoristic, Etymological, Mythical, Analogical, Dialectical, Synthetic, Monologic, Temporising and Regressive methods etc., we can find in Upanishads.
The Mundaka Upanishad, 2022
For the first time since the Mundaka Vedanta text was created around the 3rd century BCE, this book reveals to the readers its true purpose, namely to neutralize the existential threat the true Mundaka Upanishad posed to decadent Vedism. In this text, the Vedic poets replaced Brahman, the central deity of the Upanishads, with Purusha, the central deity of the Vedanta, and replaced Yoga, the Upanishads' mode of worship, with Vedanta's mode of worship, namely, Karma (Yajnas tainted with animal sacrifices), Tapas, Shraddha, Vedic studies (Mun:2:1:6). Thus, the main goal of the Mundaka was to preserve corrupt Karma known as Sukrita (good deeds) by which thousands of Brahmins made their lucrative living. After neutralizing the true Mundaka Upanishad, the Vedic poets sequestered it in the Brahmanic domain as Shruti, attached this text to the Atharva Veda, declared it as the Vedanta -the culmination of the Vedic wisdom. However, they still retained the name the Upanishad to this highly corrupted text. I have presented ample evidence to the reader from the text as well as other sources to substantiate these claims. However, I realize that to believers no amount of facts is enough to accept reality. Therefore, this book is for those readers whose minds are not closed by the force of indoctrination by the vested interests. I recommend that the believers read what Swami Vivekananda said about this in the first two pages of this book: "Is religion to justify itself by the discoveries of reason, through which every other science justifies itself? Are the same methods of investigation, which we apply to sciences and knowledge outside, to be applied to the science of Religion? In my opinion, this must be so, and I am also of opinion that the sooner it is done the better. If a religion is destroyed by such investigations, it was then all the time useless, unworthy superstition; and the sooner it goes the better. I am thoroughly convinced that its destruction would be the best thing that could happen. All that is dross will be taken off, no doubt, but the essential parts of religion will emerge triumphant out of this investigation. Not only will it be made scientific — as scientific, at least, as any of the conclusions of physics or chemistry — but will have greater strength, because physics or chemistry has no internal mandate to vouch for its truth, which religion has."
Middle European Student Indology Conference, 2009
My aim is to show Bṛhadāraṇyaka as an extraordinary source of not only philosophical and religious ideas but also a base of information about everyday condition of the upaniṣadic man - his fears, desires, expectations and relationships with the others and with the world. In Bṛhadāraṇyaka we confront impersonal description of a human as a part of universal system but we also meet „real” people in their intimate situations. I will try to present the Upaniṣads as the text originated from the concern and care about status of the human searching for his place in the universe. Using the methods of analysis based on phenomenology and the theory of culture which follows the definition by S. Pietraszko that „culture is the living with accordance to the values” I will outline the structure of the world presented in Bṛhadāraṇyaka as a text which does not only describe but also judges and expresses specific world-views. Is the hierarchy of values represented by the Upaniṣad coherent and consistent? What do the different domains of values (cognitive, dharmic, aesthetic, moral, religious, etc.) represent and how they relate to each other? My analysis is going to be an attempt to show how a cultural analysis based approach to ancient Indian texts can change the traditional reading and interpretation of it.
Religions, 2019
Implicit in Heidegger’s 1920–1921 Phenomenology of Religious Life is an account of religion as a radical transformation of the very structures of experience. This article seeks to apply that account to a classical Indian discourse on reality and the self, Chāndogya Upaniṣad chapter six. This classical source-text for two thousand years of Hindu theology advocates a new ‘religious life’ achieved through phenomenologically reorienting the very structures of cognition toward the broadest truths of reality, rather than the finite features of the world. The goal is to create a new form of primordial subjectivity with an altered relationship to phenomena, finitude, and the divine. The article proceeds in two parts: The first section brings out Heidegger’s theory of religion through a reading of Heidegger’s 1920 Phenomenology of Religious Life with the help of his lectures, On the Definition of Philosophy, from the previous year. The second section tries to demonstrate the value of integra...
Indian Studies – Slovenian Contributions, 2008
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SCIENCE AND SCIENTIST CONFERENCE 2015, BANGALORE, 2015
The paper attempts to present a description and explanation of human birth, actions, growth, death and transmigration via further births. The central idea is that of a universal eternal spirit (UES) that plays its game of Leelaa via its power of Maayaa, and the infinitude of manifestations in our Universe. The concepts of Dharmaa, and Karmaa that form a bedrock of Hinduism's model of human lifecycles are described. Basically, the paper posits that human birth, consciousness, and life involve an uncanny game played by the UES, for itself, against itself, through itself, by itself, and with itself.
this work deals with an introduction to Upanisads and tries to bring out the meaning of Upanisad. And it explores on date setting and form of the Upanisad. beside this it also has accentuates the factors for bringing out the work as well as how western scholars looks it. subsequently we found some of ots teachings.
Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 2018
The purpose of the present project is to study the Upaniṣads and Mullā Sadrā as expounders of mystical philosophy dealing with the question of the nature of Ultimate Reality and its concomitant issues. To be more specific, this study is an examination focused on the metaphysical theories propounded by them. The mystical and philosophical systems constructed by Upaniṣads and Mullā Sadrā are often viewed as being representative of absolutism found within their respective traditions. The striking differences generally perceived between aspects of Hinduism and Islām have, however, somewhat prevented scholars to develop interest in the comparison of philosophies rooted in these two philosophical traditions. This study will be exploring the systems of these influential traditions to ascertain if this approach is true.
哲學與文化, 2022
The Prajñāpāramitā Upadeśa or Dazhidu Lun is commonly recognized as a Mādhyamaka text, due to its attribution to Nāgārjuna, being a Prajñāpāramitā commentary, and its status in the Sān Lùn school. However, its hermeneutic approach is more complex than mere application of Mādhyamaka principles to the Prajñāpāramitā text alone. Fascicles 11-34, which explain a range of dharmas qua practices which pervade the Sūtra, show a consistent and structured method of exegesis. Typically, the dharmas are first contextualized as to their position within the sūtra. Then this positioning is justified in terms of its necessity. Next, an extensive Abhidharma analysis is given, which covers the majority of the exegesis. The question of which Abhidharma system and sectarian affiliation of the author requires clarification. Lastly, the dharma(s) are interpreted through the Mādhyamaka method, giving a pithy yet ultimate exegetic conclusion. Here we will examine the critical importance of the Ābhidharmika material and its relationship to the Mādhyamaka in the text's hermeneutical method. Its role is more than simply a patsy against Mahāyāna dialectic.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.