Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Rising education costs are an imperative problem in the United States.Over the last 20 years, the cost for a student to attend college has increased 439%. Currently, the United States is ranked 10th out of 30 countries for the number 25 to 34-year olds that hold associate degrees or higher. However, Americans are continually falling behind in education. This speech discusses the problems and causes associated with rising tuition costs and also proposes solutions to decrease the costs of higher education.
The Student Debt Crisis surpassed credit card debt as a hegemonic source of debt by Americans. The exponential rise in the cost of college has forced the majority of young Americans to take out student loans. This debt has followed many Americans throughout their lives even to the point of defaults. The meteoric rise in tuition and decline in state support has been catastrophic for the future of the middle class. The origin behind this draconian upheaval in price may reside with the fall in state appropriations or the truth may be found elsewhere.
Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science
Higher education has always been a fundamental cornerstone for development and prosperity in the United States. It is incumbent upon the government and other stakeholders to formulate policies to ensure our institutions of higher education are well resourced and funded to enable economic development. The unprecedented price hikes in tuition at universities and colleges, coupled with high student loan interest rate has compelled a lot of students to drop out of college [1]. Majority of the dropouts are now resorting to drug sale and other nefarious activities in order to sustain their lives. The current pandemic has put a huge strain on the American economy with over a million death and unemployment is at all-time high. This article critically examines the severity of insufficient funding for higher education and the adverse impact of the escalating tuition fees. To regulate the rising tuition fees, suggestions are made with reference to sustainability of strategies and policies to s...
1990
Even within the public and private sectors there is a great deal of variation in tuition levels. Although some four-year private institutions have annual tuitions greater than $10,000, many others charge significantly lower tuitions. Within the public sector, most schools charge less than $3,000 a year in tuition, due to operating subsidies provided to those schools by state and local governments. Public Perception of College Costs The public thinks that college is more expensive than it really is. Many prospective students are also largely misinfcrmed about the availability of financial aid resources that help students and their families pay for college. Several recent reports reveal this lack of information about college costs and financial aid. A recent Gallup survey has shown that 13-to 21-year-olds greatly overestimated the average cost of tuition, fees, books and supplies at four-year colleges. They estimated these costs at public four-year institutions to be more than three times the actual figure. The same group estimated that costs at private four-year colleges were one-third higher than they actually were. According to a recent General Accounting Office report, only 12 percent of high school sophomores in 1980 thought that the Pell Grant program was available to pay for further study beyond high school. Only eight percent thought that Stafford Loans were available. In fact, such grants and loans are available to all who qualify. v 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report would not have been possible without the assistance and cooperation of the U.S. Department of Education and an outside advisory panel. Throughout the project, Gregory
2010
As concern over rapidly rising college costs and tuition sticker prices have increased, a variety of research has been conducted to determine potential causes. Most of this research has focused on factors unique to higher education. In contrast, cost disease theory attempts to create a comparative context to explain cost increases in higher education. The theory postulates that all heavily labor-intensive industries will experience faster than average cost increases, based on the limitations in leveraging technology to increase productivity. This research attempts to analyze the extent to which a cost disease affects college costs and tuition sticker prices in two distinct segments. First, trend
2010
As concern over rapidly rising college costs and tuition sticker prices have increased, a variety of research has been conducted to determine potential causes. Most of this research has focused on factors unique to higher education. In contrast, cost disease theory attempts to create a comparative context to explain cost increases in higher education. The theory postulates that all heavily labor-intensive industries will experience faster than average cost increases, based on the limitations in leveraging technology to increase productivity. This research attempts to analyze the extent to which a cost disease affects college costs and tuition sticker prices in two distinct segments. First, trend
2005
As Congress debates the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, it should heed Friedrich Hayek's warning that democracy is "peculiarly liable, if not guided by accepted common principles, to produce over-all results that nobody wanted." One result of the federal government's student financial aid programs is higher tuition costs at our nation's colleges and universities. Basic economic theory suggests that the increased demand for higher education generated by HEA will have the effect of increasing tuitions. The empirical evidence is consistent with that-federal loans, Pell grants, and other assistance programs result in higher tuition for students at our nation's colleges and universities.
Higher education should be more affordable for everyone, since nowadays it is practically a requirement for most jobs and imperative to strive in today’s market. In order to offer high quality education, universities need to be constantly investing, which increases their expenses substantially. However, there are many ways to cut costs and consequently lower the price of higher education for the students. The average tuition in United States is much higher when comparing to other leading countries, which also offer high quality of education. College tuition should be more affordable so students will not have to borrow so much money for tuition through student loans, which generate life-long debts for many of them. The result of the current tuition values is that some college graduates have to refuse internships in their area of study because they need greater income to pay for their students loans.
1997
This paper examines expenditure patterns at higher education institutions in recent years, in light of the spiraling cost of higher education. It utilizes data from the U.S. Department of Education's Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), begun in 1986, and the Higher Education General Information Survey (HEGIS), which goes back to 1966. IPEDS and HEGIS figures demonstrated that instruction predictably accounts for the largest percentage of total spending. While spending increased in almost all categories between 1977 and 1994, increases were smallest in the traditional areas of instruction, library, and plant operations, and largest in ancillary services and administration. Instructional spending as a percentage of total expenditures fell at public universities, public four-year colleges, and private four-year colleges. Research spending as a percentage of total expenditures increased significantly at private and public universities. Comparing different types of institutions, the largest proportionate change from 1990-91 to 1994-95 was a decrease in mean instructional expenditures at Carnegie Classification Research I public universities of 5.9 percent. Three appendixes provide IPEDS variable descriptions, Carnegie Classification codes, and a list of Carnegie-classified doctoral institutions. (Contains 14 references, 17 tables of data, and 1 figure.) (MDM) *
2005
Everyone in America knows that college prices have been going up at an alarming rate. For nearly three decades, tuition inflation has been the subject of continuing family concerns, student anxiety, gubernatorial proclamations, and congressional investigations. In spite of this, there is no end in sight. In the last three years, tuition inflation has accelerated to its fastest level yet. In 2002-03, tuition and fees at four-year and twoyear public institutions rose, often startlingly so, in every state. In Massachusetts, for example, tuition jumped from $3,295 to $4,075, an increase of 24 percent in one year. Iowa, Missouri, and Texas increased tuition by 20 percent. In Ohio, the increase was 17 percent. Sixteen other states increased tuition by more than 10 percent (Trombley, 2003, p. 1). There is no reason to believe that this acceleration of tuition inflation rate was a one-year phenomenon. Rather, it seems likely to be simply the next wave in a steadily accelerating price spiral that has been going on for nearly 25 years. In spite of this, it is important to note that rising prices do not seem to be driving down the demand for higher education. The number of students enrolled in college seems to increase every year. The portion of high school graduates attending college increases as well. In 2002-03, for example, more than 15 million students were enrolled in degree granting institutions of higher education. Twelve million of these students, about 65 percent, attended public institutions. By almost any measure, more students are entering college in spite of the rising prices. One study put it this way, ''To enhance their opportunities and realize their educational aspirations, Americans work more hours than in the
1970
This paper is a criticism of "Finance and the Aims of American Higher Education" by Howard R. Bowen (HE001412). VeEring toward "free education" is inconsistent with ordinary notions of equity beCause: (1) the purely private benefits of higher education accruing directly to the individual are s,ub.s;tantially greater than all costs incurred, and (2) individuals who attend college, as a group, ccme disproportionally from upper income families. A policy of high tuition, even higher than actual costs, for those who can afford it and substantial aid to those who can't would be more equitable. A.l ow tuition policy may also adversely affect an institution's ability to maintain academic freedom and determine its own programs, because of its increasing dependence on the action of legislators. Pressures on governmental budgets are increasing at all levels and there is little likelihood that there will be a substantial increase in governmental support. Income from tuition will be essential to cover widening educational opportunities and instructional costs which, otherwise, will continue to exclude many individuals with real economic need from higher education. High tuition and high student aid are complementary. (AF)
2010
As concern over rapidly rising college costs and tuition sticker prices have increased, a variety of research has been conducted to determine potential causes. Most of this research has focused on factors unique to higher education. In contrast, cost disease theory attempts to create a comparative context to explain cost increases in higher education. The theory postulates that all heavily labor-intensive industries will experience faster than average cost increases, based on the limitations in leveraging technology to increase productivity. This research attempts to analyze the extent to which a cost disease affects college costs and tuition sticker prices in two distinct segments. First, trend
International Journal of Educational Advancement, 2009
For at least a century, tuition at selective private colleges and universities has risen annually by two to three percent more than the rate of inflation. It wasn't until the 1980s, though, that tuition growth began to regularly outstrip growth in median family income. During the 1990s, endowments grew enormously as a result of the booming stock market, leading many observers to wonder why tuition needed to be raised at all.
2011
As concern over rapidly rising college costs and tuition sticker prices have increased, a variety of research has been conducted to determine potential causes. Most of this research has focused on factors unique to higher education. In contrast, cost disease theory attempts to create a comparative context to explain cost increases in higher education. The theory postulates that all heavily labor-intensive industries will experience faster than average cost increases, based on the limitations in leveraging technology to increase productivity. This research attempts to analyze the extent to which a cost disease affects college costs and tuition sticker prices in two distinct segments. First, trend analysis is used to analyze components of the higher education price index from 1961 through 2008 to assess the extent to which labor costs have driven higher education costs over time. Second, changes in higher education costs and tuition prices are compared against components of the Person...
The dominant issues in the financing of higher education in 2015 stem from the underlying upward trajectory of higher education costs in all institutions: a trajectory that can only be “solved” either on the cost side—e.g. by further deferring maintenance, cutting faculty and / or staff positions, or substituting less costly part-time for regular full-time faculty—or on the income side—e.g. by increasing net tuition revenue and philanthropy at rates equal or greater than these increasing costs, or for public colleges and universities, by state governments ceasing their pattern of annual budget reductions and beginning to restore the state taxpayer’s share of these increasing instructional costs. The consequence has been an unfortunate combination of increasing institutional austerity and annually increasing tuition fees, especially in public colleges and universities, which threaten the public goals of increasing access, persistence, and college choice as well as reducing the rise in unmanageable debts. This paper examines the recent past and speculates on several possible futures—including possible dramatic, or profound, changes in instructional delivery.
International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 2019
Due to the increase in tuition, when choosing a university to studying the US, costs are becoming a serious problem. The average cost of higher education in the US in 2016-2017 ranged from $9,700 for public four-year institutions to $33,500 for private four-year institutions, and this price is getting increased annually. Indeed, afterWorld War II when the GI bill was introduced to the public for the purpose of making more accessible higher education to war veterans, the college attendance also rose rapidly. As a result of the dramatic increase in the student body at colleges and universities, the tuition in higher education was also changed. But the real change in higher education cost occurred when the value, quality, and quantity of higher education increased, and eventually, this transformation uprooted the long-lasting free tuition higher education in the United States. The findings of this paper demonstrate that the high cost of college attendance led many students out of colleges from the beginning and left hundreds and thousands of students with incompleteeducational degrees. For this reason, the current paper aims to provide an answer to the question that how and why the tuition increased in higher education in the US after World War II. The article is prepared by a desk study using a variety of presently available researches, papers, and data related to students? tuition, accommodation cost, and loans.
The Review of Higher Education, 2004
1998
This report uses text, tables, and figures to analyze the current costs of attending college for undergraduate and graduate students enrolled at four-year public colleges and universities, and is based on data from the College Board's Annual Survey of Colleges. The report also describes trends in tuition and fees for resident undergraduate students from 1989-90 to 1997-98 and suggests some reasons why these costs are increasing. Some of the findings highlighted are: during this period average resident tuition and mandatory fees increased by 7.9 percent annually, while room and board charges grew at a rate of 4.7 percent; the largest percentage increases occurred in the early 1990s, more recent years have shown lower increases; the majority of resident undergraduates at public colleges and universities attend institutions that charge less than $3,000 in tuition and fees; the primary reason for tuition increases is that state appropriations for public higher education declined by 8 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars between 1989-90 and 1995-96; the percentage of undergraduates receiving student financial aid rose from 50 percent to 67 percent during this period.
International Journal of Computer Mathematics - IJCM, 2004
In this paper, presented at the NACUBO annual meetings in Milwaukee in 2004, the author traces the fundamental problems facing the country’s colleges and universities, in particular the reasons for the rapid rise in tuition across the United States above inflation rates, and also the disparity in faculty salaries between public and private institutions.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.