Matter-Antimatter and its Potential Applications

2017.09.22 Antimatter that does not exist. Hasty name and recognition., 2017

Two versions have been advanced, which explain "antimatter" as a rare quantum state of ordinary matter. Confirmatory arguments are given.

There are no theory on antimatter structure unless the mirror of its normal matter, with the same mass but opposite qualities such as electric charge, spin,· · ·, etc. to its matter counterparts holding with the Standard Model of Particle. In theory, a matter will be immediately annihilated if it meets with its antimatter, leaving nothing unless energy behind, and the amounts of matter with that of antimatter should be created equally in the Big Bang. So, none of us should exist in principle but we are indeed existing. A few physicists explain this puzzling thing by technical assuming there were extra matter particles for every billion matter-antimatter pairs, or asymmetry of matter and antimatter in the end. Certainly, this assumption comes into beings by a priori hypothesis that the matter and antimatter forming both complying with a same composition mechanism after the Big Bang, i.e., antimatter consists of antimolecules, antimolecule consists of antiatoms and antiatom consists of antielectrons, antiprotons and antineutrons without experimental evidences unless the antihydrogen, only one antimolecule. Why only these antimatters are detected by experiments? Are there all antimatters in the universe? In fact, if the behavior of gluon in antimatter, i.e., antigluon is not like the behavior but opposites to its matter counterparts or reverses gluon interaction F g k to −F g k , 1 ≤ k ≤ 8 complying with the Standard Model of Particle, then the residual strong interaction within hadrons is repulsion. We can establish a new mechanism of matter and antimatter without the asymmetry assumption but only by composition theory of matter, explain the asymmetry of matter-antimatter and why only these antimatters found, claim both the attractive and repulsive properties on gravitation. All of the conclusions are consistent with known experiments on matter and antimatter.

Progress in Physics, 2019

There are no theory on antimatter structure unless the mirror of its normal matter, with the same mass but opposite qualities such as electric charge, spin,· · ·, etc. to its matter counterparts holding with the Standard Model of Particle. In theory, a matter will be immediately annihilated if it meets with its antimatter, leaving nothing unless energy behind, and the amounts of matter with that of antimatter should be created equally in the Big Bang. So, none of us should exist in principle but we are indeed existing. A few physicists explain this puzzling thing by technical assuming there were extra matter particles for every billion matter-antimatter pairs, or asymmetry of matter and antimatter in the end. Certainly, this assumption comes into beings by a priori hypothesis that the matter and antimatter forming both complying with a same composition mechanism after the Big Bang, i.e., antimatter consists of antimolecules, antimolecule consists of antiatoms and antiatom consists of antielectrons, antiprotons and antineutrons without experimental evidences unless the antihydrogen, only one antimolecule. Why only these antimatters are detected by experiments? Are there all antimatters in the universe? In fact, if the behavior of gluon in antimatter, i.e., antigluon is not like the behavior but opposites to its matter counterparts or reverses gluon interaction F g k to −F g k , 1 ≤ k ≤ 8 complying with the Standard Model of Particle, then the residual strong interaction within hadrons is repulsion. We can establish a new mechanism of matter and antimatter without the asymmetry assumption but only by composition theory of matter, explain the asymmetry of matter-antimatter and why only these antimatters found, claim both the attractive and repulsive properties on gravitation. All of the conclusions are consistent with known experiments on matter and antimatter.

2021

The missing anti matter 1. Gaurav singh patel ,2. aman kumar Yadav , 3. sahil kumar Researcher of astronomy physics, government polytechnic Lucknow Addressvillage and post birpura jalaun 285001 Abstract-when the universe is going to start then matter and antimatter was in same quantity then where the antimatter went. Why we don't see antimatter in this universe.

Advances in Image and Video Processing, 2021

From the moment it was first proposed, the Big Bang model has faced serious problems of one form and another. Amongst these was the fact that it proposed an initial balance between matter and antimatter but no collections of antimatter were observed. Here, this problem is addressed yet again, drawing on earlier work by several distinguished scientists but also advancing ideas based on recent analyses that have revealed a new seventh scalar part to the electromagnetic field with positive and negative energy. Introduction.

Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements, 1999

After a brief discussion of the theoretical specukions concerning the presence of cosmological antimatter, the status of the experimental investigations is revised. The observational programs for the next future (BESS, ISOMAX, WIZARD, WIZARD/PAMELA and AMS) are illustrated, and possible further developments discussed.

This article is an improved version of an old manuscript. This is a theoretical assumption about the possible existence of a new form of matter. Up to day the unmatter was not checked in the lab.

Physics Today, 2003

This is an article intended for publication in Physics Today.

Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 2003

Two of the most compelling issues facing astrophysics and cosmology today are to understand the nature of the dark matter that pervades the universe and to understand the apparent absence of cosmological antimatter. For both issues, sensitive measurements of cosmic-ray antiprotons and positrons, in a wide energy range, are crucial.

Nuclear Physics A, 2004

In this talk I first give a short overview of antinuclei produsction in recent experiments at RHIC. Then I discuss the possibility of producing new types of nuclear systems by implanting an antibaryon into ordinary nuclei. The structure of nuclei containing one antiproton or antilambda is investigated within the framework of a relativistic mean-field model. Self-consistent calculations predict an enhanced binding and considerable compression in such systems as compared with normal nuclei. I present arguments that the life time of such nuclei with respect to the antibaryon annihilation might be long enough for their observation. Few experimental signatures are suggested. Possible formation of multi-quark-antiquark clusters is also discussed.