On the Question of Biological Origins

DHIU, CHEMMAD, 2018

The tendency of science to scold religion is getting stronger in this days, both science and religion are widely misunderstood as contradicting each other. While the religion and science are considered as two sides of a single coin. This study is an attempt to to prove this close connection between. The questions about human origin dates back to the time when man was created. Islam and modern science have divergent perspectives on this controversial topic. The research includes origin of universe and earth along with a detailed comparison between both viewpoints. The book named "Origin of species by means of natural selection" by Charles Darwin has caused for many revolutionary debates among Islamic and scientific scholars. Islam looks upon man's origin as a direct act of god. He created man by his power, this concept is called 'creationism'. Though science has united views on origin of universe and earth it goes vary on origin of human being. Someone says the man was created and others say man was evolved. But they can’t provide enough explanations for creationism. So, they turned into evolution theory and begun to be scolded for every now and again. This research provides due consideration for both concepts and makes the scientific one diffused in front of Islam. Because, Islam gives due proofs while science not.

Journal of Islamic Studies, 2011

The compatibility between Islamic doctrine(s) and the theory(ies) of biological and human evolution is one of the most important topics facing the Islamic culture today. Indeed, this question is tied to two crucial issues for Islam today: a) the role and place of scientific evidence in Islamic thought and theology; b) the relative authority between scientific knowledge and scriptural references. These two aspects of the problem determine how a Muslim thinker considers the acceptability of Evolution (and its consequences) -as in the case of David Solomon Jalajel in this book.

Berber *b-< AA *b-122. SBrb.: Hgr. té-hît, pl. té-hât-în [h < *b?] «nom d'une petite guêpe (à corps rayé brun et jaune)» [Fed. 1951/52: 501] ||| LECu.: Arbore bâtante 'beehive' [Hayward?] ||| NOm.: Janjero bot-ô 'bee' [Cri.] = bot-ô 'bee ', bot-o 'Bienenkorb' [Lmb. 1993: 334] = bôt-ôô 'beehive' [Aklilu n.d.; Aklilu-Siebert 1993: 19] | (?) Hozo bat-i [un less < *mat-i] 'honeybee ' [Sbr.-Wdk. 1994: 13], bhd [late var. < *bht?] (fire det.) '1. Duft einatmen, Wohlgeruch reichen, 2. durchräuchern, beräuchern' (XXII., Wb 1467, 12 to 468, 1-4) ||| ECh.: Migama bóttó «enfumer» [JA 1992, 71], Bidiya böt «enfumer trou pour déloger un gibier (écureuil)» [AJ 1989, 60]. From AA *b-h-t 'to smoke' [GT]. 124. SBrb.: EWlm. & Ayr a-haz [h < *b] «se hâter, se presser, se dépêcher», caus. zo-haz «hâter, presser, activer» [PAM 140] ||| Sem. *b^ (?) [GT]: Geez bo^a 'i.a.: 3. to be swift' [LsL] ||| NEg. bs (GW) [irreg. - § < *-c] 'rapid (of water)' (NE, DLE I 147) = 'Stromschnellen' (GHWb 262) HI WCh.: Goemay bes [b < *b?-?] '1. quickness, 2. (adv.) quickly' [Srl. 1937, 13] = bes 'to be easy, quick, inexpensive' [HIw. 2000: 1], From AA *b-?-c 'quick' [GT], ' NB: Any connection to Akk. (nA) bäsi 'bald nach, alsbald' [AHW 110]? 125. SBrb.: EWlm. & Ayr huk-at [h ~ h < *b] «1. se lever et s'en aller, 2. (Ayr) se cambrer (cheval)» [PAM 133] ||| PCu. *bVk-'to rise, be high' [GT]: NAgaw: Hamir bek y 'hinaufsteigen, -klettern' [Rn. 1884: 346], Qemant bïk y «s'élever, apparaître en s'élevant», bïkïtâ

Analysis of published works in the domain of etymology of Sefardic surnames and suggestion of a program for a scientific approach to this domain

TSAQAFAH

argues that human creation model in Islamic perspective differs from evolutionary and positivist model. The issue centers upon a question as to when Adam was information is crucial without which knowledge of his origin would be a matter of purely speculative presumption. By employing a tawh} îd clarifying that his arrival along with his wife was in approximately between 7000 and 8000 years ago, not in terms of hundreds of thousands of years ago. This

The number of pentagrams is limited. Theoretically the list of pentagrams may be completed some day. Today (18th of July, 2023) I added 7 new pentagram entries to the list: (1) TVEIR, (2) SEDMĬ, (3) SUAIN, SUEIN, SWAIN, (4) SUNIA, (5) BJØRN, BJORN, (6) ALVIS, ELVIS, (7) ZIBOR, (8) ASINU, (9) ELGUR. ELVIS may be interpreted as a modern name, but the root ALVIS (“all-wise”) indicates a inherited name from the runic origin of the Germanic mythology. The etymology of the name is unknown. Also BJØRN's etymology is “uncertain”. A similar runic word SWAIN for young, strong man (swain) is derived from another pentagram “SWINE”. The words for “SWINE” belong to the word category “pentagrams”, which indicate powerful and impressive animals: such as WISENT, ZIBOR, BISON, MINOS, ELGUR, LÚKOS, BJØRN, SWINE, MORIN, ASINU. All these words belong to the respectful hunters, who gave names to their impressive and powerful preys, whose symbolism and names were used to honor the godlike kings (MINOS) and gods (Zeus as a Tauros). The name-givings for the powerful animals (and their related kings and gods) may have followed an etymological root, but the etymology of a pentagram may also be categorized as “uncertain”, because etymologists do not believe in pentagrams. This paper concentrates on the powerful animals, whose name-giving is derived from a great variety of pentagrams, whose names (probably) are not based on a metaphor. These names may be very old.

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

https://embryologyinthequran.blogspot.com/ The purpose of this informal paper is to analyze the claims and arguments found in a booklet titled Embryology in the Qur’an: A Scientific-Linguistic Analysis of Chapter 23 Version 2.1b authored by Hamza Andreas Tzortzis, Senior Researcher and Lecturer at the Islamic Education and Research Academy. Many other Muslim apologists and websites make similar claims and arguments and thus most of this analysis will have a wider applicability.The content of this paper has been researched and developed with much diligence and integrity. Any errors on the part of the author’s research will be duly noted and immediately rectified.

Journal of Bioeconomics, 2000

Reconstructing evolution from a`gene's-eye' point of view has been one of the most challenging intellectual adventures of the late 20th century. J. Maynard Smith & Eo È rs Szathma Âry are among the most prominent of the adventurers. Here they present a very accessible summa of their views, written for a general, interdisciplinary readership. The main question they examine is how ways of transmitting information have changed. Changes in the methods of information storage, transmission and translation establish major transitions' in evolution. Smith & Szathma Âry identify eight of these transitions. The ®rst leads from replicating molecules to populations of molecules in compartments or membranes; the second leads from independent replicators consisting of simple molecules, to their linkage in chromosomes; in the third, DNA appears together with protein, derived from RNA in its previous double function as gene and enzyme; the fourth step is from prokaryotes to eukaryotes; in the ®fth, sex is invented; the sixth results in multicellular organisms; the seventh in colonies of organisms which can be likened to a superorganism; and the ®nal step leads from primate societies to human societies and to the paramount importance of language. The steps involved in each transition are explained as far as possible in terms of what we might call the principle of sel®sh information'. This principle can be explained as a mechanism whereby each change in genetic information that leads to a more ef®cient reproduction of itself gives it an advantage over its competitors. The genes that (through their impacts on the ®tness or behavior of the organism) cause more copies of themselves to be present in future generations, will generally be selected.