Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2017, Emerging Ritual in Secular Societies. A Transdiscplinary Conversation
…
29 pages
1 file
The effectiveness of ritualizing depends more on the senses and sensemaking than on thinking or dogma. Ritualizing must touch the body’s felt sense and effect a felt shift. Coherence with the values and culture of the person at the centre of the ritual ensure that the ritual is right because it feels right. Over the last 17 years, Gordon-Lennox developed, tested and refined a naturalistic approach to the creation of secular ceremonies for the major passages of life. Her training as a psychotherapist, in particular for the treatment of trauma, and her expertise in world religions enriches the approach she summarizes with three watchwords: accompaniment, authenticity and affect.
Crafting Secular Rituals. A Practical Guide, 2017
Foreword by Isabel Russo, Head of Ceremonies at the British Humanist Association A unique, hands-on guide to the craft of ritualmaking. Answering the call for new rituals in our secular age, this book recognises the essential importance of rituals to the psychological, physiological and spiritual health of individuals, families, organisations, and society as a whole. The book examines and explains the history, function and place of emerging rituals in different cultures, as well as providing practical guidance for creating your own secular rituals. The author includes examples, risk factors and checklists for the stages of planning new rituals for important life events such as birth, marriage death and public occasions.
Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 1979
Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 2003
Magic, Ritual and Witchcraft 6.2 : 235-42, 2011
One of the most obscure and recalcitrant of the subjects with which religion is associated is that of the meaning of ritual forms. Research particularly in Anthropology in the last generation has helped to transform our understanding of this, but this has also strongly misled students of ritual, for it has tended not to take ritual and religion themselves seriously on their own terms, but to be reductionistic, i.e., reducing religion and ritual with it merely to socio-cultural values. This omits the very foundation of ritual in experiential spiritual realms. This essay is therefore a meditation on ritual that attempts to take it seriously as the embodied enactment of religious meaning, existing simultaneously on a multitude of levels, physical, personal, social and spiritual, and therefore as revealing meaning and levels of reality in the world that can be discovered, fully experienced and properly explored in no other way. We seek to clarify in this meditation, in short, what ritual "does" as such, in all religious cults, and so we focus on its foundational implications that appear in and underlie any particular expression of it. Our approach is phenomenological, but our reflections lead us to question and modify many common assumptions about the role of will, personhood and ethical encounter, and the nature of the holy, not only as developed in Anthropological studies both English and French, but also in the philosophical writings of Kant, Buber, and even leading phenomenological theorists such as Merleau-Ponty.
Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 1997
The study tries to explain a clear understanding of rituals, religion and secular practices in society. It begins by stating the meaning of Ritual, Religion, and Secular; Ritual Too often, the word "ritual" is abused because a ritual considers that it does not rely on the repetition of action but also needs other factors. The definitions provided by anthropologists of the word "rite" are often very contrasting. The rite has the prerogative of being plastic and adapting to social change, and for this reason, every author has a distinct definition. The concept of ritual, if it was only part of the primitive and exotic societies that are now part of the contemporary world, rites are part of the communities because they need a lot of symbolization.The term "rite" comes from the Latin word ‘ritus’ that mean ritual. It is from this that many anthropologists have developed different definitions.
Theorizing Rituals: Vol I: Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts, edited by Jens Kreinath, Jan Snoek and Michael Stausberg, xiii–xxv. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2006
It is unclear when rituals first originated. Some assume that ritual, like dance, music, symbolism, and language, arose in the course of the evolution of primates into man, 1 or even prior to it. 2 Thus rituals may also have facilitated, or even stimulated, processes of adaptation. Be that as it may, biologists and behavioral scientists argue that there are rituals among animals, and this has important implications for our understanding of rituals. 3 Unlike animal rituals, however, sometime in the course of the evolution of (human) ritual, and in specific cultural settings, rituals have partly become the business of experts (priests). These ritual specialists, it can safely be assumed, often not only developed a ritual competence in the sense of performative skills but also began to study the rituals of their own tradition. Hence, one may assume that within this process of specialization, social differentiation, and professionalization, 4 indigenous forms of the study of rituals evolved. In contrast to the modern, mainly Western academic study of rituals, these indigenous forms of ritual studies can be referred to as 'ritualistics'. 5 * A first draft of this introduction was written by Michael Stausberg. It was then jointly revised and elaborated upon by the editors of this volume. We wish to thank Ingvild S. Gilhus (Bergen) and Donald Wiebe (Toronto) for helpful comments on a previous draft. 1 See also Bellah 2003. (Here, as throughout the volume, works listed in the annotated bibliography are referred to by author and year only. Those items not listed in the bibliography will be provided with full references in the notes.) 2 Staal 1989, 111 states: "Ritual, after all, is much older than language." See also Burkert 1972. 3 See Baudy in this volume. 4 See Gladigow 2004. 5 See Stausberg 2003. Although a small group of us began using the term at American Academy of Religion meetings, today it has wide currency in a large number of disciplines" (p. 1). See also Grimes 1982 and his bibliography, Research in Ritual Studies (Grimes 1985). In terms of the establishment of a new field of research, see also his article on ritual studies in the Encyclopedia of Religion from 1987. 8 See, e.g., Grimes 1990; Bell 1997. 9 Over the last five years, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Council) funded two large-scale research programs on rituals: Kulturen des Performativen (Sonderforschungsbereich 447 [http://www.sfb-performativ.de] since 1999) and Ritualdynamik (Sonderforschungsbereich 619 [http://www.ritualdynamik.uni-hd.de] since 2002). Some contributors to the current volume are members of the former (Christoph Wulf) or the latter (Dietrich Harth, Axel Michaels, William S. Sax, and Jan A.M. Snoek). 10 The editors themselves were members of a junior research group, Ritualistik
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 2024
Handbook to Psychological Anthropology (Proofs), 2005
Practical Theology, 2018
Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 2003
Emerging Ritual in Secular Societies. A Transdisciplinary Conversation, 2017
International Journal for The Psychology of Religion, 2012, 22, 89-92
International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 2018
Yearbook for Ritual and Liturgical Studies
Ritual, 1987
Social Analysis, 48, no. 2: 1-32, 2004