Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2007, Linguistics and Philosophy
This paper proposes a method for computing the temporal aspects of the interpretations of a variety of Germa sentences. The method is strictly modular in the sense that it allows each meaning-bearing sentence constituent to make its own, separate, contribution to the semantic representation of any sentence containing it. The semantic representation of a sentence is reached in several stages. First, an ‘initial semantic representation’ is constructed, using a syntactic analysis of the sentence as input. This initial representation is then transformed into the definitive representation by a series of transformations which reflect the ways in which the contributions from different constituents of the sentence interact. Since the different constituents which make their respective contributions to the meaning of the sentence are in most instances ambiguous, the initial representations are typically of a high degree of underspecification.
Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 2004
In this paper, we sketch a new approach to the problem of the temporal interpretation of nominal predicates. The approach differs from previous analyses (eg, Enç (1986), Musan (1999), Tonhauser (2002)) in that it is grounded in a different ontology, namely one that regards individuals as spatiotemporal entities (aka 'spatio-temporal worms')(Heller (1990), Sider (1997), inter alia): roughly, the idea is that individuals have temporal parts (or stages)—and are indeed like events, for that matter—in the same way they have spatial parts. As we ...
Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive presentation sessions -, 2006
The interpretation of temporal expressions in text is an important constituent task for many practical natural language processing tasks, including question-answering, information extraction and text summarisation. Although temporal expressions have long been studied in the research literature, it is only more recently, with the impetus provided by exercises like the ACE Program, that attention has been directed to broad-coverage, implemented systems. In this paper, we describe our approach to intermediate semantic representations in the interpretation of temporal expressions.
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Temporal expressions-references to points in time or periods of time-are widespread in text, and their proper interpretation is essential for any natural language processing task that requires the extraction of temporal information. Work on the interpretation of temporal expressions in text has generally been pursued in one of two paradigms: the formal semantics approach, where an attempt is made to provide a well-grounded theoretical basis for the interpretation of these expressions, and the more pragmatically-focused approach represented by the development of the TIMEX2 standard, with its origins in work in information extraction. The former emphasises formal elegance and consistency; the latter emphasises broad coverage for practical applications. In this paper, we report on the development of a framework that attempts to integrate insights from both perspectives, with the aim of achieving broad coverage of the domain in a well-grounded manner from a formal perspective. We focus in particular on the development of a compact notation for representing the semantics of underspecified temporal expressions that enables the component-level evaluation of systems.
Proceedings of the Workshop on Annotating and Reasoning about Time and Events - ARTE '06, 2006
The extension to new languages is a well known bottleneck for rule-based systems. Considerable human effort, which typically consists in rewriting from scratch huge amounts of rules, is in fact required to transfer the knowledge available to the system from one language to a new one. Provided sufficient annotated data, machine learning algorithms allow to minimize the costs of such knowledge transfer but, up to date, proved to be ineffective for some specific tasks. Among these, the recognition and normalization of temporal expressions still remains out of their reach. Focusing on this task, and still adhering to the rule-based framework, this paper presents a bunch of experiments on the automatic porting to Italian of a system originally developed for Spanish. Different automatic rule translation strategies are evaluated and discussed, providing a comprehensive overview of the challenge.
Computing Research Repository, 2000
Besides temporal information explicitly avail- able in verbs and adjuncts, the temporal in- terpretation of a text also depends on general world knowledge and default assumptions. We will present a theory for describing the relation between, on the one hand, verbs, their tenses and adjuncts and, on the other, the eventuali- ties and periods of time they represent and their
2007
This paper is devoted to the following question: how can readers and listeners infer temporal relations in discourse? This question presupposes that one of the basic inferential task in utterance and discourse interpretation consists in inferring time direction, that is, in determining the time of the event relative to the thread of discourse. In this paper, I reduce time direction to two temporal relations: forward inference (FI) and backward inference (BI). I show that the computation of directional inference is neither the result of principles of discourse, nor the consequence of discourse type, but the interaction of information coming from different sources, that is, contextual information and linguistic information. Moreover, I distinguish within linguistic information between conceptual and procedural information. A general pragmatic device is proposed, whose goal is to balance the different types of information during the computation of directional inferences. The purpose of this device is to explain why some sequences of discourse are more optimal than other, with no requirement of any principles of discourse analysis. The main issue of the paper is to argue for a pragmatic approach to discourse phenomena which requires no specific device, but uses the standard cognitive pragmatic framework, introduced by Relevance Theory.
Proceedings of the first Syntax AiO Meeting, edited by …, 2005
Working Papers in Linguistics, 1984
Linguistics and Philosophy, 1993
This paper presents a formal account of how to determine the discourse relations between propositions introduced in a text, and the relations between the events they describe. The distinct natural interpretations of texts with similar syntax are explained in terms of defeasible rules. These characterise the effects of causal knowledge and knowledge of language use on interpretation. Patterns of defeasible entailment that are supported by the logic in which the theory is expressed are shown to underly temporal interpretation.
Semantics and contextual expression, 1989
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1996
Computational Linguistics, 1988
Two weeks later, Bonadea had already been his lover for a fortnight."-Robert Musil, Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften. A semantics of temporal categories in language and a theory of their use in defining the temporal relations between events both require a more complex structure on the domain underlying the meaning representations than is commonly assumed. This paper proposes an ontology based on such notions as causation and consequence, rather than on purely temporal primitives. A central notion in the ontology is that of an elementary event-complex called a "nucleus." A nucleus can be thought of as an association of a goal event, or "culmination," with a "preparatory process" by which it is accomplished, and a "consequent state," which ensues. Natural-language categories like aspects, futurates, adverbials, and when-clauses are argued to change the temporal/aspectual category of propositions under the control of such a nucleic knowledge representation structure. The same concept of a nucleus plays a central role in a theory of temporal reference, and of the semantics of tense, which we follow McCawley, Partee, and Isard in regarding as an anaphoric category. We claim that any manageable formalism for naturallanguage temporal descriptions will have to embody such an ontology, as will any usable temporal database for knowledge about events which is to be interrogated using natural language. To map the temporal relations expressed in these examples onto linear time, and to try to express the semantics of when in terms of points or intervals (possibly associated with events), would appear to imply either that when is multiply ambiguous, allowing these points or intervals to be temporally related in at least three different ways, or that the relation expressed
1997
ftp site: ftp.unive.it Contents p. 1 Abstract " 1 1. Introduction " 2 2. Interpreting Temporal Locations " 2 2.1 Conceptual Representations " 2 3. Aspect and the TD feature " 4 4. Quantifiers and Interpretation " 6 5. Global vs Internal: two features for event structure " 8 6. Factuality and the Structure of events " 11 7. Event structure and Quantification " 14 8. Quantifier Raising " 18 8.1 Uniqueness and Genericity " 21 9. The algorithm for temporal interpretation " 23 9.1 Tense and Aspect: two separate relations with Time Reference " 25 9.2 Implementing Allen's algorithm " 27 9.3 Semantic representations " 29 10. References " 31 11 Acknowledgements " 32
Minds and Machines, 1997
Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics -, 1992
A proposal to deal with tenses in the framework of Discourse Representation Theory is presented, ms it has been implemented for a fragment at the IMS for the project LILOG. It is based on the theory of tenses of H. Kamp and Ch. Rohrer. The system uses tile tense and aspect information, the information about the temporal discourse structure of tile preceding text stored in a specific list of possible reference times, and background knowledge. These types of information interact in order to choose a suited temporal anchor for the event of a new sentence. With respect to extended texts, choosing the right reference time for a new event is a problem which has been largely neglected in the literature.
Gragoatá
This paper investigates the grammatical strategies deployed by natural languages in order to express temporal reference. We show that temporal reference is obtained by combining a finite set of pieces of meaning which are constrained by the metaphysics of natural language and which languages distribute differently across functional categories. The paper discusses more specifically temporal adverbial clauses that express the meanings of anteriority and posteriority with respect to some reference time. We consider a relevant set of languages that make use of different strategies in order to generate these meanings, and conclude that the tools that languages may deploy are of a limited number, and include tense, aspect and temporal connectives.
2000
Combining ideas from Donald Davidson, Hans Reichenbach and Discourse Representation Theory (DRT), I will develop a constraint-based semantics for the Dutch tenses and temporal auxiliaries which is fully integrated in the HPSG framework. The semantics will be inspired to a large extent by DRT, but the syntax is squarely based on the lexicialist surface-oriented approach of HPSG, and so is the treatment of the relation between syntax and semantics. Instead of DRT's construction rules which map syntactic structures onto discourse representation structures, I will use lexically anchored constraints on the relation between syntactic, semantic and pragmatic properties of signs. Since the constraints which I will use are monotonic, the resulting treatment is non-directional, in contrast to DRT's construction rules, which are unidirectional (from syntax to semantics) and irreversible. Next to this technical advantage, there is also a conceptual one: since the construction rules of DRT have the unlimited power which was once characteristic of transformations in the Standard Theory, they allow for such a broad range of stipulations and arbitrarily complex conditions that the linguist is not encouraged to strive for maximum transparency in the formulation of relations between syntax and semantics/pragmatics. The constraint-based approach, on the other hand, imposes a much tighter discipline on the formulation of such relations, and thus enhances the possibility of arriving at computationally viable analyses.
Journal of Linguistics, 2001
This article explores the interface between the syntactic and semantic representation of natural language with respect to the interpretation of time. The main claim of the paper is that the semantic relationship of temporal dependency requires syntactic locality at LF. Based on this claim, I explore the syntax and semantics of gerundive relative clauses. I argue that since gerundive relatives are temporally dependent on the tense of the main clause, they need to be local with a temporal element of the main clause at LF. I show that gerundive relatives receive different temporal interpretations depending on their syntactic position at LF. This analysis sheds light on the behavior of gerundive relatives in constructions involving coordination, existential there, scope of quantificational and cardinality adverbials, extraposition, presuppositionality effects and binding-theoretic reconstruction effects.
The annotation of temporal relations remains a challenge, being a very difficult task for humans, not to mention machines, to reliably and consistently annotate temporal relations in natural language texts. This paper advocates a change in the definition of the problem itself, by proposing a staged divide-and-conquer approach guided by syntax, that offers a more principled way of selecting temporal entities involved in a temporal relation. The decomposition of the problem into smaller syntactically motivated tasks, and the identification of accurate and linguistically grounded solutions to solve them, promote a sound understanding of the phenomena involved in establishing temporal relations. We illustrate the potential of linguistically informed solutions in the area of temporal relation identification by proposing and evaluating an initial set of syntactically motivated tasks. RÉSUMÉ. L'annotation de relations temporelles demeure encore aujourd'hui un défi : annoter manuellement de façon fiable et cohérente les relations temporelles dans des textes reste difficile et l'est bien plus encore lorsqu'il s'agit d'annotation automatique. Cet article préconise un changement dans la définition du problème en proposant une approche qui, en s'appuyant sur la syntaxe et sur une stratégie de type « diviser pour conquérir », offre une manière plus élaborée de sélectionner les entités impliquées dans une relation temporelle. La décomposition du problème en de plus petites questions se concentrant sur la syntaxe et l'identification de solutions précises et linguistiquement fondées pour les résoudre favorisent une meilleure compréhension des phénomènes impliqués dans l'établissement de relations temporelles. Nous illustrons le potentiel des solutions linguistiquement fondées dans le cadre de l'identification de relations temporelles en proposant et évaluant une première série de tâches se concentrant sur la syntaxe.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.