Academia.eduAcademia.edu

ASI Final Report 08202013.doc

2014

Abstract

The report herein presents the results of a Section 106 compliance review for an existing cultural resources investigation by Archaeological Research and Archaeological Services, Inc. (ASI) efforts to upgrade a report completed for City of Lakeport’s California Environmental Quality Act environmental review program to a report suitable for compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Qualifications of ASI personnel ate provided in Appendix H. ASI’s report is not meant as a critical review of the technical aspects of the existing report prepared by Archaeological Research, who generously shared all of its project files with ASI and fully cooperated with this investigation. However, it has been both necessary and appropriate to identify areas where CEQA compliance significantly varies from compliance with federal laws and regulation. It must be emphasized that Archaeological Research complied fully with the City of Lakeport’s CEQA compliance process, provided documentation appropriate for the City to comply with relevant state laws and regulations, and completed the work in a timely fashion in a way that did not delay the project. Given the local predilections and vagaries of local CEQA enforcement, we are uncertain if it would have been feasible for Archaeological Research to propose a more extensive program then was undertaken. Nevertheless, this report identified deficiencies with respect to federal compliance. Between May 2012 and April 2013 ASI: • Judged the National Register eligibility of the historical structure that once stood on the APE • Reviewed the City-implemented CEQA cultural resource program to identify where it falls short of full Section 106 compliance. Concomitantly, we identified where the Archaeological Research report (Parker 2011a) does not comply with federal reporting standards • Judged the National Register eligibility of the identified archaeological site (both historical and prehistoric components) • Consulted with pertinent Native American communities and the local historical society • Generated stratigraphic profiles for the project area based on geotechnical studies prepared by project engineers Rau and Associates, Ukiah, California • Prepared California Department of Parks and Recreation primary, structure, archaeological site, and other forms as appropriate, and filed these with the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System • Prepared a final report that complies with the California Office of Historic Preservation’s (OHP) recommended content for Archaeological Resource Management Reports (OHP 1990) and a historic structure report that complies with OHP (2003) content guidelines • Evaluated the National Register eligibility of a demolished structure and an archaeological site with prehistoric and historic components • Assessed the effects of the as built project on the identified cultural resources