THE DIAGNOSTICS OF OPERATIVE TRAUMA OF THE TRIGEMINAL NERVE'S

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 1994

In order to evaluate accurately trigeminal nerve damage and the response to microneurosurgical treatment, a reproducible, objective test of trigeminal nerve function is required. This study investigates the use of somatosensory evoked potentials as an objective monitor of trigeminal nerve function after microneurosurgical repair.

Head & Face Medicine, 2010

Background: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is applied to evaluate somatosensory nerve fiber function in the spinal system. This study uses QST in patients with sensory dysfunctions after oral and maxillofacial surgery.

2012

Trigeminal nerve injury is the most problematic consequence of dental surgical procedures with major medico-legal implications. This study reports the signs and symptoms that are the features of trigeminal nerve injuries caused by mandibular third molar (M3M) surgery. 120 patients with nerve injury following M3M surgery were assessed. All data were analysed using the SPSS statistical programme and Microsoft Excel. 53 (44.2%) inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury cases and 67 (55.8%) lingual nerve injury (LNI) cases were caused by third molar surgery (TMS). Neuropathy was demonstrable in all patients with varying degrees of paraesthesia, dysaesthesia (in the form of burning pain), allodynia and hyperalgesia. Pain was one of the presenting signs and symptoms in 70% of all cases. Significantly more females had IAN injuries and LNIs (p<0.05). The mean ages of the two groups of patients were similar. Speech and eating were significantly more problematic for patients with LNIs. In conclusion, chronic pain is often a symptom after TMS-related nerve injury, resulting in significant functional problems. Better dissemination of good practice in TMS will significantly minimize these complex nerve injuries and prevent unnecessary suffering.Copyright © 2012 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2015

Objective To report the incidence of trigeminal neuropathy seen among new patients in a referral center within a period of 1 year (2013). The cause of damage, method of management and treatment outcome was assessed after 1-year follow-up. Materials and Methods The records of all new patients visiting the oral and maxillofacial unit of the University hospital of Leuven in 2013 were screened for a history of damage to branches of the trigeminal nerve. The selected records were examined and the duration of nerve damage, received treatment as well as the outcome of the neuropathy after treatment was noted after 1-year follow-up. Results 56 patients (21 males, 35 females) from 7602 new patients had symptoms of damage to the trigeminal nerve branch. These symptoms persist in more than onethird of the patients [21/56 (37.5 %)] after 1-year followup. The least recovery is seen from oral surgery, implant placement, orthognathic surgery and tooth extraction. After 1 year 85 % (12/14) of neuropathic pain cases still have their symptoms as compared to 19 % (5/26) of patients with hypoesthesia. Conclusion This study shows a low incidence of nerve damage among the new patients presenting in oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic (\1 %); however, one-third of patients who sustain nerve damage never recover fully. Early diagnosis of the cause of neuropathy is essential. There is a need to objectively assess all patients with symptoms of trigeminal nerve damage before, during and after treatment.

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2012

Purpose: The aim of this study was to apply a standardized Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) approach in patients to investigate whether oral surgery can lead to sensory changes, even if the patients do not report any sensory disturbances. Furthermore, this study determines the degree and duration of possible neuronal hyperexcitability due to local inflammatory trauma after oral surgery. Patients and Methods: Orofacial sensory functions were investigated by psychophysical means in 60 patients (30 male, 30 female) in innervation areas of infraorbital nerves, mental nerves and lingual nerves after different interventions in oral surgery. The patients were tested 1 week, 4 weeks, 7 weeks, and 10 weeks postoperatively. As controls for bilateral sensory changes after unilateral surgery, tests were additionally performed in 20 volunteers who did not have any dental restorations. Results: No differences were found between the control group and the control side of the patients. Although not 1 of the patients reported paresthesia or other sensory changes postoperatively, QST detected significant differences between the control and the test side in the mental and lingual regions. Test sides were significantly less sensitive for thermal parameters (cold, warm, and heat). No differences were found in the infraorbital region. Patients showed significantly decreased pain pressure thresholds on the operated side. QST monitored recovery over time in all patients.

Faculty Dental Journal, 2011

The most significant complications from dental surgical interventions are iatrogenic trigeminal nerve injuries, which can result in permanent altered sensation and pain, causing considerable functional and psychological disability. This paper provides some useful tips on minimising the risks of these injuries. By understanding the risk factors and modifying the resulting intervention, more of these injuries may be prevented.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2012

Trigeminal nerve injury is the most problematic consequence of dental surgical procedures with major medico-legal implications. This study reports the signs and symptoms that are the features of trigeminal nerve injuries caused by mandibular third molar (M3M) surgery. 120 patients with nerve injury following M3M surgery were assessed. All data were analysed using the SPSS statistical programme and Microsoft Excel. 53 (44.2%) inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury cases and 67 (55.8%) lingual nerve injury (LNI) cases were caused by third molar surgery (TMS). Neuropathy was demonstrable in all patients with varying degrees of paraesthesia, dysaesthesia (in the form of burning pain), allodynia and hyperalgesia. Pain was one of the presenting signs and symptoms in 70% of all cases. Significantly more females had IAN injuries and LNIs (p&lt;0.05). The mean ages of the two groups of patients were similar. Speech and eating were significantly more problematic for patients with LNIs. In concl...

Dental Update, 2018

Restorative dentistry provides many opportunities to cause trigeminal nerve damage. Chronic post-surgical pain, resulting from nerve damage, is rarely associated with dentistry as a result of local anaesthetic (LA) infiltration injections but is more commonly associated with injuries to the nerve trunks of division two and three caused by LA blocks, implants and endodontics. In dentistry, the term paraesthesia is often used inappropriately to mean neuropathy. Paraesthesia is only a descriptive term of symptoms, meaning altered sensation, and not a diagnosis. When sensory nerves are injured, a neuropathy (malfunction) may arise and this may be painful or non-painful. Fortunately, painful post-traumatic neuropathy, caused by injury to nerves, is rare in dentistry compared with other common general surgical procedures, where up to 20−40% of patients experience chronic post-surgical pain after limb amputation, thoracotomy and breast surgery. This article aims to highlight how to prevent nerve injuries using strategies for risk assessment, appropriate surgical techniques and suitable follow-up protocols to allow urgent management to optimize resolution of the nerve injuries when they occur. CPD/Clinical Relevance: Prevention of rare nerve injuries arising from common dental procedures is key, as many high risk procedures can cause lifelong neuropathic pain, functional and immense psychological impact for the patients involved, for which there is no simple remedy.

Aims: To describe the cause, clinical signs, and symptoms of patients presenting to a tertiary care center with iatrogenic lesions to the mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve. Methods: Pain history, pain scores using the visual analog scale, and mechanosensory testing results were recorded from 93 patients with iatrogenic lingual nerve injuries (LNI) and 90 patients with iatrogenic inferior alveolar nerve injuries (IANI). Results were analyzed using the SPSS statistical software. Chi-square tests were applied for nonparametric testing of frequencies, where P ⋜ .05 indicated statistical significance. Appropriate correlations were also carried out between certain data sets. Results: Significantly more females were referred than males (P < .05). Overall, third molar surgery (TMS) caused 73% of LNI, followed by local anesthesia (LA) (17%). More diverse procedures caused IANI, including TMS (60%), LA (19%), implants (18%), and endodontics (8%). Approximately 70% of patients presented with neuropathic pain coincident with anesthesia and÷or paresthesia. Neuropathy was demonstrable in all patients with varying degrees of loss of mechanosensory function, paresthesia, dysesthesia, allodynia, and hyperalgesia. Functionally, IANI and LNI patients mostly had problems with speech and eating, where speech was affected amongst significantly more patients with LNI (P < .001). Sleep, brushing teeth, and drinking were significantly more problematic for IANI patients (P < .05, P < .001, and P < .0001, respectively). Conclusion: Neuropathic pain, as well as anesthesia, frequently occurs following iatrogenic trigeminal nerve injury similar to other posttraumatic sensory nerve injuries. This must be acknowledged by clinicians as a relatively common problem and informed consent appropriately formulated for patients at risk of trigeminal nerve injuries in relation to dentistry requires revision.

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2005

Existing tests of function of the lingual nerve are either subjective or, when they elicit the jaw-opening reflex, are dependent on the cooperation of the subject. We report a study in 12 healthy volunteers and 12 patients with iatrogenic injury to the lingual nerve. A bite block (containing stimulating electrodes) was held between the teeth and the tongue was held on to the electrodes by suction. When the lingual nerve was intact, an electrical stimulus elicited brief inhibition of masseteric electromyographic activity. Local analgesia and iatrogenic injury to the lingual nerve altered nerve conduction and caused a reduction in reflex inhibition. Two methods, compatible with limited numbers of applications of the stimulus, were used to quantify responses. One used an indirect measurement of intervals between action potentials of muscle and the other used a measurement of rectified signals falling below the mean amplitude before and after the stimulus. Both methods gave values that correlated with subjective sensations. The first gave an estimate of the probability of defining major malfunction of the nerve objectively; the second gave a linear measurement that allowed recovery of the nerve to be followed.