Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
33 pages
1 file
The paper explores the intersection of visualization and cognition, emphasizing the importance of 'inscription devices' in shaping scientific discourse and belief systems. It critiques the traditional narratives around writing and visualization by focusing on how these elements facilitate the alignment of arguments and the persuasion of audiences within an agonistic context. By rejecting overly broad historical approaches, the work advocates for understanding the specific mechanisms that underpin the effectiveness of visual aids and written communication.
Changes in communication technologies have over and over again in the course of history resulted in changes in the nature of scientific thought. In particular, the printing press, in the specific European context, played a central role in giving rise to the development of modern science. Printed scientific texts, to a greater or lesser degree, have been regularly accompanied by diagrams and pictures; however, some spectacular exceptions notwithstanding, the text dominated the image. And while the logic of the linear text was conducive to strict reasoning, it also fostered excessive specialization and compartmentalization within science. The philosopher and sociologist Otto Neurath, a leading member of the Vienna Circle, was among the first to suggest that, with the help of a pictorial language, a new unity within science could be achieved. (Published in Kristóf Nyíri, ed., Mobile Learning: Essays on Philosophy, Psychology and Education, Vienna: Passagen Verlag, 2003, pp. 45–67.)
Historical Studies in the physical and biological …, 1997
Technology and Culture, 1998
Since the 1980s, interdisciplinary research crossing literature and the sciences has gone through substantial development through the stimulating input of both historians of the sciences and literary scholars. Research, which generally positions itself at the level of discourse, attaches priority to two paths, either by focussing on the use that literary texts make of scientific discourse, or by examining " literary technologies " employed by sciences as supports of " poetics " or a " rhetoric " of sciences. My perspective here will be somewhat different, to the extent that the aim is not to identify borrowings or influences between these two fields but instead to distinguish a common field, the shared use of intellectual resources that bring visual imagination into play. The hypothesis that will guide me is that mathematics and literature share an iconic character which is crucial for their specific semiotic regime and that can be attributed to the implication of diagrammatic properties both in natural and formal language (Batt, 2007).
Social Science Computer Review, 1995
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science, 2017
Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage, 2018
Early Science and Medicine, 2009
The British Journal of Aesthetics, 2011
The British Journal for the History of Science, 2016
Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2006
2019
Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 2015
International Lexicon of Aesthetics, 2018
El mundo descrito, 2008
Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives …, 1998