Women, Learning, and Charitable Leadership in Canada
Michelle Coombs
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
This thesis explores how female charitable-sector leaders draw on dominant discourses and how they counter them in their talk about leadership and learning. Drawing on rich narratives coming out of female leaders' interviews, I demonstrate how gender and identities are constructed through dominant discourses drawing on feminist poststructuralism and intersectionality theory. This inquiry uses a transdisciplinary discursive approach combining Critical Discourse analysis (CDA), Feminist Post-structuralist Discourse Analysis (FPDA), and Discursive Psychology (DP). Drawing on these approaches ensures that gender remains at the forefront, that a connection occurs between societal discourses and day-to-day talk, and that the research attends to how subjectivities are created through talk. The intention is fourfold. First, this research aims for a greater understanding of how present masculine constructions of leadership are manifest in charitable organizational leaders' talk. Second, it explores how such masculine leadership ideals are negotiated and challenged. It identifies how these discourses occur and create points of tension or ideological dilemmas. Third, it investigates moments where dominant discourses are contested in talk. Finally, this research considers how learning is implicated in these processes. The findings demonstrate, first, that women are positioned through dominant discourses of leadership, gender, and difference, and that this places iii them as something "other" than a leader. Dominant discourses, though they circulate broadly, penetrate the non-profit sector contextually. Second, the findings establish that charitable-sector leaders negotiate and challenge dominant discourses. Third, the findings demonstrate that women contest these notions through discursive mechanisms, including naming dominant discourses, using non-damaging discourses, and rediscursivization. The contestation of dominant discourses also occurs contextually and, sometimes, in contradictory ways and works to challenge the status quo. Fourth, learning is embedded in discourse resulting in women learning in and through dominant discourses as they lead. This research contributes to the understanding of how dominant masculine rationality is learned and perpetuated in leaders' talk, as well as how it is challenged.
Related papers
Feminine/Feminist: A poststructural reading of relational learning in women's social action organizations
Unpublished manuscript, 2004
This paper reports on research with 8 board members and 8 directors of women's social action organizations. A poststructural reading of the data gives voice to an under theorized aspect of humanist relational learning in women's organizations and makes visible the power-relationships. It explores women's learned practices of resistance, and offers a paradoxical view of relational learning on social action that attends to the ethic of care as well as to power relations. The intersection of the feminine/feminist signifier in women's social action organizations risks reifying stereotypic feminine learning traits: relational , caring and connected , and inclusive (MacKeracher,1996). These signifiers of women's learning and organization have been valorized in internal discourse, public perception, and some adult education and feminist theory, leading to an almost simplified portrayal of women's learning as homogenous, uncomplicated, and harmonious . They reinforce the classical organizational distinction of either collectivist (female) or bureaucratic (male) institutions , resulting in a portrait of women's learning in these organizations as removed from disputation, division, and discord. To relieve it of some of its burden of harmony, this study brings a Foucauldian (1977, 1980) poststructural approach to women's relational learning in social action organizations, by focusing on women in women's organizations rather than women in men's organizations.
Re‐presenting women and leadership: a methodological journey
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 2008
Research on women’s leadership has tended to focus upon detailed micro studies of individual women’s identity formation, or alternatively, to conduct macro studies of its broader discursive constructions within society. Both approaches, although providing helpful understandings of the issues surrounding constructions of women’s leadership, are inadequate. They fail to deal with the ongoing dilemma raised in both Cultural Studies and studies of discourse and identity, in relation to the negotiation of subjectivity and representation, that is, how broader societal discourses and media representations of women’s leadership, both inform and are informed by, the lived experiences of individual women. In this article, we outline a range of methodological approaches that were drawn upon in a study of a small group of senior women academics from ethnically and socioeconomically diverse origins. We examine how the women negotiated the frequent mismatch which arose between on the one hand, societal discourses and media representations which often reproduced narrow and highly stereotypical accounts of women’s leadership, and on the other hand, the individual women’s subjective experiences of leadership which challenged such representations. We contend that we need to draw upon a number of methodological perspectives in ways which trouble and unsettle homogenized versions of women’s leadership in order to fully explicate more nuanced and complex ways of understanding how women’s leadership identity is formed.
Narrative research and feminist knowing: a poststructural reading of women's learning in community organizations
McGill Journal of Education/Revue des sciences de l' …, 2006
This paper reports on qualitative research with 8 board members and 8 directors of women's social action organizations. A poststructural reading of the narrative data gives voice to an undertheorized aspect of humanist relational learning in women's organizations and makes visible the power-relationships. The power relationships are explored and shown to be an integral part of how women learn and lead, challenging the usual reading of women as kind, caring and uncomplicated. Through the medium of narrative, this research explores women's learned practices of resistance, and offers a paradoxical view of relational learning that attends to the ethic of care as well as to power relations. Implications for the education of women are drawn
Feminist challenges to mainstream leadership trough collective reflection and narrative
M. Reynolds, R. Vince (a cura di) Handbook of Experiential Learning and Management Education, 2006
1 This article is the result of an entirely collaborative effort by the three authors. If, however, for academic reasons individual responsibility must be assigned, Silvia Gherardi wrote the introduction, the first section, and the conclusion; Barbara Poggio wrote sections 2, 3, and 4. [email protected] [email protected]
A Discursive Approach to Understanding Women Leaders in Working Life
Journal of Business Ethics, 2001
In this paper, we develop a theoretical framework for understanding women leaders in working life. Our starting point is in statistics and earlier women-in-management literature, which show that women leaders represent a minority of the managerial population. We assume such underlying mechanisms causing discriminatory practices towards women leaders to exist which have become naturalized and invisible. Our concern is that everyone irrespective of gender should have a fair chance in career progression. This is both a moral and also an economic challenge. The framework we develop in this paper is an alternative approach to studying women leaders compared to traditional women-in-management literature. It aims at revealing the "natural and taken-for-granted" cultural mechanisms behind discriminatory practices. Our framework is based on a critical discursive approach, which draws on ideas of how women's leadership becomes symbolically represented and constructed in discursive practices. These symbolic constructions, which are mediated through language, often have an ideological loading which positions women leaders and builds their identities in ways that can help to legitimize unequal relations between the genders. However, our framework emphasizes the possibility of multiple discourses and a dynamic view of culture. The cultural constructions of women leaders are, thus, open to change.
“Gender equality discourse is the glass ceiling we hit here”
Routledge eBooks, 2022
Negotiating Identity and Performing Leadership in Discourse A Gender-Based Study
NUST Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
This research adopts a social constructionist perspective and a discourse approach to explore how men and women in leadership positions construct their identities and perform leadership within workplace talk. The key objectives of the study are to analyze uniformity and variation in the discourse features and interactional styles, the role of norms and stereotypes in determining the linguistic choices available to male and female leaders, and the implications of uniformity and variation in their language use. The theoretical framework of this study draws on Judith Butler’s Performativity theory (1990) along with West and Zimmerman’s concept of ‘Doing gender’ (1987). The data for this research is collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews conducted with males and females holding leadership positions in the selected research sites. The data analysis reveals that both male and female leaders use a variety of discourse features and employ language as an effective tool to nego...
Gender Mainstreaming - Hidden Leadership?
Gender, Work & Organization, 2011
This article intends to open a discussion of what it might mean to lead gender equality mainstreaming in the context of significant changes in equality legislation and in the governance of the public services. The research data are drawn from two sources: a research workshop with public service managers in the south-west of England and interviews with equality advisors in five English local government organizations. The analysis contributes to a growing stream of feminist and critical leadership research that is concerned with the gendered, relational and interpretive practices of leading. It also contributes to research into forms of leadership that are emerging in the context of changes in the public services in the UK and more widely in the European Union. Leadership of gender mainstreaming is conceptualized in its gendered, relational and interpretive qualities. Address for correspondence: *Margaret L. Page, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY; e-mail: Margaret.Page@ uwe.ac.uk Gender, Work and Organization. ...
Gender Differences and Leadership Contention: A Case Study in the Rhetoric of Social Research
1974
The purpose of this investigation was to describe behaviors observed as comprising leadership contention and gender differences in groups. As defined in this study, leadership contention differs from leadership in that it is comprised of behaviors individuals derive from their beliefs about what leaders do and is also specifically concerned with a developmental process through time. Following a revie'i of the literature which proved to be inadequate in providing logically valid hypotheses, the next step in the investigation was the analysis of communicative behaviors of three groups of five people recorded on video tape during 4-hour periods. The bulk of the study is devoted to explaining the logical paradoxes encountered in studying leadership contention and gender differences and to demonstrating the role of the researcher's socialization in his or her construction of the group under investigation. The study concludes with a brief description of an alternative way of approaching subject matter so that paradoxes created by researcher socialization can be employed to discover r,:ti and fruitful ways to investigate and construct social reality.
Related papers
“You can be the kind of woman that you are”: the discursive management of intersecting identities in leadership talk
Ψυχολογία. Το περιοδικό της Ελληνικής Ψυχολογικής Εταιρείας, 2023
The present study investigates how culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD), and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) women mobilize intersecting identities through speeches delivered during women in leadership forums. As more women aspire to positions of leadership, the discursive analysis of identity management for understanding how identities are made relevant is critical. Using a discursive psychological approach, this research examines intersectionality as a social action, as it is played out in practice rather than as a theoretical concept. Here it is being anchored to empirical data to explore how it operates in the broader context of leadership talk, in particular, how diverse women represent themselves as leaders and what key identities emerge. The analysis demonstrates that in accounting for how these women achieved leadership positions, the speakers used their multiple identities as strategic resources. These identities included the categories of race, culture, gender, and parenthood. The insights from this study are significant as they shed light on the persisting barriers for women in achieving equal opportunity.
Women, Leadership, and Change – Navigating between Contradictory Cultures
Nora: nordic journal of feminist and gender research, 2022
This article explores how women in top leader positions navigate between the two contradictory cultures of masculinity and femininity and, in particular, if and how these positionings and negotiations develop over time. Drawing on working-life biographical interviews with women on the top of organizational hierarchies within the crisis management systems in the Nordic countries, the article illustrates women top leaders relating to norms of masculinity and femininity, demonstrating how these have shaped their roles as top leaders, and how these have shifted along their careers. It shows how, in the beginning of their careers, women in organizations marked by cultures of masculinity conform to these gendered norms, while in their roles as top leaders, they do gender differently and assume roles as change agents. The findings suggest that processes of navigation between organizational cultures of masculinity and societal cultures of femininity can be better understood when individual experiences are situated within their gendered social and cultural expectations.
From a Politics of Dilemmas to a Politics of Paradoxes: Feminism, Pedagogy, and Women's Leadership for Social Change
Journal of Management Education, 2016
Transformational learning is a process resulting in deep and significant change in habitual patterns of identity, thought, emotion, and action, enabling new approaches to role enactment. This article explores how moving from a framework of dilemmas, which require solutions and one-sided choices, to a framework of paradoxes that embraces tensions and contradictions can contribute to meaningful transformational learning in the context of women's leadership development. Drawing on recent theories of paradoxes and on critical feminist theory, we propose a critical feminist pedagogy of paradoxes for developing women's leadership of social change enterprises. This perspective is put forth based on our analysis of an experiential course in a graduate gender studies program wherein participants take on leadership roles and interrogate them, by integrating theoretical discussions, reflection, and practical engagement in social activism. We use case studies from our
Discourses of leadership: Gender, identity and contradiction in a UK public sector organization
Leadership, 2006
This article explores leadership as a discursive phenomenon. It examines contemporary discourses of leadership and their complex inter-relations with gender and identity in the UK public sector. In particular, it focuses on various ways in which managers' identities are constructed within discourse, produced in specific historical and institutional sites within specific discursive formations and practices, by specific enunciative strategies . Drawing from interviews with senior managers employed in a large UK local authority, this article researches the dominant discourses of modernization and the primacy afforded to discourses of leadership in the council. It explores first how these discourses become part of managerial workplace identities, and second, what other discourses help to shape managers' identities. Contradiction, discursive production, plurality and ambiguity feature heavily in the analysis of these managers. Accordingly, the article questions dominant hegemonic and stereotypical notions of subjectivity that assume a simple, unitary identity and perpetuate androcentric depictions of organizational life.
Learning from Leading Women's Experience: Towards a Sociological Understanding
Leadership, 2008
Conceptions of leadership draw largely on the leadership experiences of a limited population, and of those in a restricted range of organizational settings. This article begins to address some of these biases by examining the experiences of six leading women in differing sectors. In researching the `how' of leadership there emerges a web of four inter-related factors that connects these leaders to their community and that plays a foundational role in their lives: upbringing, environment, focus and networks and alliances. The ways in which leadership is experienced and constructed by women, the article therefore argues, can be made more sense of through a sociological lens, and raises questions about how tendencies in research sites lead to gendered and individualistic understandings of leadership. In illuminating the need to make the distinction between representations of leadership and our experience of leadership, the article concludes that leadership is not just about leading...
Conversations with women on leadership and social transformation
Gender at Work from http://www. …, 2004
The conversations with eighteen outstanding women leaders that follow elucidate women's visions, their perspectives on coalition building and leadership, and fundamental questions on how to challenge power and accountability.1 In their own words, these women talk about ...
Feminist futures in gender-in-leadership research: self-reflexive approximations to intersectional situatedness
Gender in Management: An International Journal
Purpose This paper introduces intersectional situatedness to develop inclusive analyses of leadership. Intersectional situatedness recognises the contextual and situated nature of experiences and their interaction with socially constructed categories of difference. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on memory work by three feminist academics who situate their understandings and experiences of leadership as part of socio-historical contexts. Findings Understandings and experiences of leadership are multifaceted and benefit from being examined in their intersectional situatedness. This way, the simultaneity of visible and invisible disadvantage and privilege, which accumulate, shift and get reconfigured across the life course and are based on particular intersectional identity invocations, can be integrated into narratives about leadership. Research limitations/implications Interrogating gender-in-leadership adopting an intersectional situatedness helps to advance the field b...
Dancing on the Razor’s Edge: How Top-Level Women Leaders Manage the Paradoxical Tensions between Agency and Communion
Sex Roles, 2018
Research documents a heightened need for women leaders to be perceived as both agentic and communal and to deal with the incongruity between communal gender-role expectations and agentic leader-role expectations. However, paradoxical tensions exist between agency and communion because they are associated with distinct, and at times conflictual, cognition, behavior, and motivation. How women leaders manage these tensions remains under-explored. To address this gap in the literature, we conducted an inductive study based on interviews with 64 U.S. women executives from various industries. Drawing from a paradox lens, we first identified four pairs of apparently contradictory agentic and communal tendencies that are interwoven in women leaders' narratives: demanding and caring, authoritative and participative, self-advocating and other-serving, and distant and approachable. We also identified five mechanisms through which women leaders bring together agency and communion: situational accentuating, sequencing, overlapping, complementing, and reframing. Our findings highlight the underlying mechanisms and constructive routes through which women leaders juxtapose agency and communion to cope with role incongruity. They also offer guidance to women leaders and leadership-development practitioners in expanding mental models and behavioral repertoires to deal with the challenges stemming from tensions between agency and communion. Keywords Agency. Communion. Leadership. Gender roles. Paradox. Double-bind It's sort of the Hillary Clinton problem, which is on the one hand, you have to demonstrate that you've got experience and you're confident and you're smart and you can get things done, but if you do, you're a bitch. And so I think women operate on a razor's edge of leadership.-Paulina, general manager in an insurance company (a study participant)
Integrating Care and Critical Reflection in Women's Leadership Development Programs
Advancing Women in Leadership Journal
Women's leadership development programs (WLDPs) have been suggested as programmatic additions for achieving gender-equity in organizational contexts. These programs are conceptualized as transformative learning spaces affording women the opportunity to explore uncritically examined assumptions and create new perspectives of themselves as leaders. This paper explains how these types of transformative learning environments are predicated on dialogue that encourages critical reflection in the context of caring relationships. Recognizing that women may arrive in leadership programs with varied capacities for both relational learning and critical reflection, this paper seeks to explore the communication practices needed to create the dialogic conditions of care and critical reflection. It outlines the results of a qualitative study that examined critical incidents of dialogue in a women's leadership development program to demonstrate the ways in which facilitators communicate...
Champions of gender equality: female and male executives as leaders of gender change
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine male and female executives as leaders “championing” gender change interventions. It problematizes current exhortations for male leaders to lead gender change, much as they might lead any other business-driven change agenda. It argues that organizational gender scholarship is critical to understanding the gendered nature of championing. Design/methodology/approach – This paper draws on a feminist qualitative research project examining the efficacy of a gender intervention in a university and a policing institution. Interviews with four leaders have been chosen from the larger study for analysis against the backdrop of material from interviewees and the participant observation of the researcher. It brings a social constructionist view of gender and Acker’s gendering processes to bear on understanding organizational gender change. Findings – The sex/gender of the leader is inescapably fore-fronted by the gender change intervention. Gendered expectations and choices positioned men as powerful and effective champions while undermining the effectiveness of the woman in this study. Research limitations/implications – Further research examining male and female leaders capacity to champion gender change is required. Practical implications – This research identifies effective champion behaviors, provides suggestions for ensuring that gender equity interventions are well championed and proposes a partnership model where senior men and women play complementary roles leading gender change. Originality/value – This paper is of value to practitioners and scholars. It draws attention to contemporary issues of leadership and gender change, seeking to bridge the gap between theory and practice that undermines our change efforts.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.