Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
311 pages
1 file
AI-generated Abstract
The paper discusses the foundational aspects of early Arabic grammatical theory, focusing on key figures such as Sibawayh and Farra'. It analyzes the evolution of syntactic concepts and conventions in Arabic grammar, highlighting how these early theorists laid the groundwork for subsequent linguistic thought. Key themes include the classification of pronouns, the role of definiteness, and the influence of historical context on grammatical interpretation.
This publication has been typeset in the multilingual "brill" typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, iPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.nl/brill-typeface.
This study aims to critically examine IgnazGolziher’s allegations on the beginnings of Arabic linguistics. According to him, the Arabic short vowel symbols did not originate in the Arab world but were adopted from the Levant. The same he assumed in regard to the three different parts of speech, namely name (ism), verb (fiÑil), and particle (harf), which allegedly presupposed the knowledge of Aristotle’s De Interpretations falsely attributed to ÑAli (Karramallahuwajhah) . Goldziher explained this connection with the scholastic disputes occurring between the different theological schools in the first century AH, with special reference to the dogmatic differences between the Murji´ah and the Qadariyyah sects. Theological debates on various doctrines were held at the same time by Eastern Christians based on the teachings of John of Damascus. In the eyes of Goldziher, these debates – based on the assumption that since they occurred in the same century – they had to be related, and furthermore, St. John of Damascus must have borrowed his ideas from Aristotle. Since no Arabic sources speak of this connection, he raises his own suspicions, namely that Muslim sources refused to admit the borrowing of ideas from the Christians. This study serves the purpose of investigating his allegations in regard to the origin of Arabic grammar and syntax and of deciding the extent of his scholarly bias. The researcher adopts a theoretical and analytical approach based on linguistic studies. In order to arrive at a balanced judgment with regard to this conflict, the linguistic corpus, as well as the historical background of transmission is being analyzed.
The Foundations of Arabic Linguistics IV, 2019
2011
Abū al-Qāsim az-Zama ẖ s ar ī’s (1075–1144) grammatical treatise Al-Mufaṣṣal fī ṣan‘at al-i‘rāb is one of the main and most acknowledged philological masterpieces of the classical Arabic. The aim of this article is to shed some light on its origin, cultural and philological background, main goals and assumptions of the author, its position in the history of studies on Arabic grammar, hitherto prevailing research output of European orientalist dealing with Al-Mufaṣṣal. It also comprises a short presentation of the figure of Az-Zama ẖ s ar ī himself. The article quotes references to Arabic, English, German, Russian and Polish source literature.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
asian studies, 2017
International Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 2023
Langues et Literatures du Monde Arabe 8 (2009): 148-50., 2009
Historiographia Linguistica 41/1, p. 109-126, 2014
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 1998
In: Harald Motzki & Everhard Ditters, (eds). Approaches to Arabic Linguistics Presented to Kees Versteegh on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, pp. 209-244, 2007
The Royal Asiatic Society, 2019
International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2014
Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik 73, 2021