Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2012, Political Theology
https://doi.org/10.1558/poth.v13i4.400…
15 pages
1 file
This paper analyses the responses of Evangelical Christians to “A Common Word between Us and You.” While many Evangelical leaders warmly welcomed the initiative and have subsequently been involved in various dialogues and conferences, others were more sceptical and refused to take part. This latter reaction reflects a general lack of trust in some parts of the Evangelical movement engendered by concerns over Muslim approaches to law, freedom of religion and conscience, the treatment of apostates under shari‘a and restrictions on Christian mission in Muslim countries. The debate between these two groups has been sharp and at times acrimonious, reflecting deeper tensions within the Evangelical community. Drawing on recent books, articles, blogs and the author’s own observations at an international dialogue conference, this paper highlights the tensions and examines some of the underlying causes.
2011
In October 2007, 138 Muslim scholars signed a document entitled "A Common Word between Us and You" (ACW) and addressed it to 28 Christian leaders worldwide. ACW invited Christians to a common ground; the belief in one God to work for peace in the world along with Muslims. ACW makes a case for this common ground with scriptural, Qur'anic as well as Biblical, underpinnings. This structure raises two important theological issues in the context of Christian-Muslim relations: first, the use of the Bible in ACW and secondly the belief in the unity of God. The dissertation analyses and evaluates the contribution of this Muslim initiative to Christian-Muslim relations based on the following question: "What does ACW do to promote a new understanding between Christians and Muslims?" The study focuses on the above two theological issues that are central to ACW. The first I wish to formally acknowledge Dr Chris Hewer and Dr Sigvard von Sicard without whose inspiration and help the task of writing this thesis would have been impossible. I am grateful to the Jesuit Community at Manresa for providing me a caring and joyful home in Birmingham. I am grateful to my Jesuit superiors for their sustained support and encouragement.
Ch7 (pp115-132) in M. Guest and E. Arweck (eds), Religion and Knowledge: Sociological perspectives, Routledge, 2012
This chapter uses the work of sociologists such as Peter Berger and Christian Smith to explore Christian reactions to Islam and the possible futures. Will Christians withdraw and entrench themselves? Will they turn to crusade? Will they capitulate? Or will they develop an ‘engaged orthodoxy’?
Can Evangelical Christians and Muslims embrace religious diversity and each other? This essay argues a qualified "yes" marshaling historic, classical, and contemporary resources by and relevant to Evangelical Christians and Muslims, sustaining mutual empathy, humanity, tolerance, religious liberty, integrity in wrestling with seemingly irreconcilable differences, cooperation, theological sharpening, a dynamic open marketplace of ideas, and love. These priorities often extend beyond Muslim and Evangelical relations with each other to invigorate constructive interaction generally among Muslims, Christians, and religiously diverse people in a multi-faith world.
This journal seeks to create space for evangelical scholars and practitioners to dialogue about the dynamics, challenges, practices, and theology surrounding interfaith work, while remaining faithful to the gospel of Jesus and his mission for his Church. Views expressed in Evangelical Interfaith Dialogue do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors or the seminary. Produced in limited quantitites. Summary Statement This issue of Evangelical Interfaith Dialogue, provides articles and responses to a conference which had four main objectives: (1) to examine the present challenge of Islamophobia in America, with particular attention to how it relates to evangelicals and Muslims; (2) to provide a biblical, historical, legal, and political rationale for greater tolerance across religions; (3) to develop (and lay the foundation for) a long-term strategy for evangelicals and others to address Islamophobia in the United States; and
Journal of Interreligious Studies, 2025
This paper explores an Islamic theology of religions that considers the theological borders of interreligious dialogue, emphasizes reciprocal relationship, and recognizes the dynamic of a dialogical relationship (i.e., going forth and coming back) to address intra-religious and interreligious dynamics in grappling with religious diversity. The “A Common Word Between Us and You” initiative of 2007 serves as a case study.
Fine Differences: The Al-Alwani Muslim-Christian Lectures 2010-2017, 2020
Reaffirming our joint spiritual journey to God, and spiritual responsibility towards humanity is the burden we all share and the antidote to bigotry, prejudice, and all those ideologies that betray mankind’s sense of compassion and justice. Wholeness – despite our persisting fine differences – for society and for persons is the theme of this Muslim-Christian dialogue sustained for six years in Washington, D.C. The power of faith is the power to unite and the recognition of commonalities through the medium of communication is one path to achieve this, and one element of Iraqi legal scholar Taha Jabir al-Alwani’s greater vision. In 2007 a conversation began between John W. Crossin, a priest of the Order of St. Francis de Sales seeking to open the door of the forty-year-old Washington Theological Consortium – heretofore all-Christian – and Ahmed Alwani, son of Taha Jabir al-Alwani. The younger Alwani was seeking an institutional partner for his father’s project of relating Islamic scholarship to Western social sciences. • Must religious emotions and ideas fuel social conflict? • Who pays the cost of mediating conflict? • What is the right way to value human labor? • Who and what is meant by the Qur’an’s reference to the “People of the Book” ? Addressing these divisive issues, Muslim and Christian thinkers in pairs dig down toward their respective ultimate convictions. Occasionally the pair concurs. Always they elucidate their fine differences.
Religious Studies Review, 2010
This collection of fifteen previously published essays testifies to the fecundity, exceptional creativity, and independence of this well-known American philosopher. In addition to five essays on politics and five essays on human nature, there are five strong essays on religion. Although Nagel is an atheist, he is highly critical of popular critiques of theism (as found in works by R. Dawkins, D. Dennett, B. Rundle), and he openly regrets that there is not yet a sound, plausible nontheistic account of the cosmos that is personally significant and satisfying. There is an excellent, balanced assessment of the intelligent design movement, its distinction from biblically based creationism, and its possible place (or not) in public education. These essays are all written in Nagel's clear and familiar style; they combine substantial arguments and insights with the charms of a friendly conversation partner. Highly recommended to those interested in theism versus atheism and the current science-religion debate.
On November 16, 2001, Franklin Graham, leader of one of the largest conservative Christian organizations in the nation, appeared on NBC Nightly News, expounding his views on God and Islam: “He’s [Allah] is not the son of God of the Christian or Judeo-Christian faith. It’s a different God, and I believe it [Islam] is a very evil and wicked religion” (para. 2). For the past 30 years, evangelical Christianity has grown in both religious and political power. For James M. Dunn, former Executive Director of the Baptist Joint Committee on Public Affairs, this coalition is the “strongest alliance of religion with power since the Puritans” (qtd. in Cohen xi). Through this alliance, Evangelicals have transformed into a political force whose goal is to establish the “Kingdom of God” on earth. This godly kingdom will supplant the rampant secularism that Evangelicals feel has devastated the morality of the United States and precipitated the rapid decline of American influence abroad. The enemy o...
Humanity's ability to live together in peace and harmony-and the very lives of both Christians and peaceful Muslims in many parts of the world-are threatened by radical Islamic elements. The World Evangelical Alliance and a major Muslim organization have agreed to work together to combat threats to their shared values and articulate a positive alternative. This article explains why such an effort is justified and how it hopes to make a global impact.
Contemporary Islam, 2010
Humanitarian Islam is a global movement that seeks to restore rahmah (universal love and compassion) to its rightful place as the primary message of Islam, while positioning these efforts within a broader initiative to preserve and strengthen a rules-based international order founded upon shared civilizational values. The inspiration for Humanitarian Islam is the unique example of the 15 th /16 th-century Wali Songo ("Nine Saints") who proselytized Islam Nusantara ("East Indies Islam")-rooted in the principle of rahmah-stressing the need to contextualize Islamic teachings and adapt these to the ever-changing realities of space and time, while presenting Islam not as a supremacist ideology or vehicle for conquest, but rather, as one of many paths through which humans may attain spiritual perfection. Established by leaders of Indonesia's 90-million-member Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), the Institute for Humanitarian Islam and Center for Shared Civilizational Values work with a group of closely affiliated organizations including Nahdlatul Ulama; the NU's 5-million-member young adults movement, Gerakan Pemuda Ansor; LibForAll Foundation; and Bayt ar-Rahmah, which helps coordinate the global expansion of NU operations. The World Evangelical Alliance (WEA) was founded in 1846 by Anglican, Baptist, Scottish Presbyterian, Methodist and Congregationalist leaders from the British Isles, as well as by prominent representatives of American and European Protestants, the latter especially from Germany. It is the largest international organization of evangelical churches, representing over 600 million Protestants and national evangelical alliances in 140 countries. WEA seeks to strengthen local churches through national alliances, supporting and coordinating grassroots leadership and seeking practical ways of showing the unity of the body of Christ. Evangelicals are recognized by their high regard for the Bible as the Word of God that guides their daily lives; the conviction that salvation is only received
Muslim World, 2020
Few, even are the contributions of authors from Middle Eastern Fundamentalist-Evangelical Protestantism that touch upon the relation with other faiths except from a missiological, evangelizing-proselytizing perspective. Recently, a Lebanese theologian from this community changed this habitus and produced a monograph on Christianity and Islam from an evangelical attention to the idea of "dialogue" and interreligious interaction. In 2019, Martin Accad, the Associate Professor of Islamic Studies at Arab Baptist Theological Seminary in Beirut, published a book titled, Sacred Misinterpretation, on the subject of Christian-Muslim dialogue. While Accad personally reflects a very tolerant, embracive and open-minded appreciation of his growth and life as Christian with Muslims in Lebanon (something the writer of this review has also experienced in a similar way in his birth-land, Syria), Accad concedes fully the, rather, globally realized conviction that religions and their relations are core-components of conflict. Nevertheless, Accad also construes the primary motivation and belief of his book's discourse on Christian-Muslim dialogue are "the idea that religious discourse can also contribute significantly in working toward peaceful relations between populations with rival ideologies" (p. 6). How can religions become part of the remedy prescription instead of one of the conflict ingredients? The transformation of the role of religious interrelations and communication in our living context, Accad suggests, lies in reviewing the Christians' and Muslims' theological reasoning about each other: "Our theologies have been fundamental to our understanding of one another, and our murky relational history seems to indicate that our mutual perceptions have been largely negative" (p. 7). It is this essential role of theologization in the history of interreligious relation between Christianity and Islam that makes theology "a foundation of dialogue", Accad believes, so that the premise of his argument becomes: "Your view of Islam affects your attitude to Muslims; your attitude, in turn, influences your approach to Christian-Muslim interaction, and that approach affects the ultimate outcome of your presence as a witness among Muslims" (p. 7). Accad's discussion and analysis all over the book become, then, pieces assembled together, on the basis of the above-mentioned premise, to create what he calls "the SEKAP spectrum of Christian-Muslim interaction". SEKAP stands for "syncretistic, existential, kerygmatic, apologetic and polemical" (p. 8). From all these trends of interaction between Christians and Muslims, Accad leaves all those who resonate to interrelationality and focuses on the one that centers around theology: He opts for the "kerygamtic interaction" option, deeming it the most fruitful and peaceful position between the two extreme options of syncretism and polemics. According to him, this option more than any other enables the exploration and finding of the most 'Christ-like' symptoms in Islam and the Muslims. For Accad, this
The increasingly politicized presence of Muslim communities in Britain today is raising issues not only for society in general but for other faith communities as well. Among these the Evangelical constituency, including the members of various Christian diasporas, is struggling to find a coherent response which is true to its Bible-based, activist roots. This thesis discusses the relationship of religion to the theoretical notion of the public sphere. Specifically it hypothesizes an Evangelical micro public sphere as the framework for an empirical exploration of the responses of British Evangelicals to Muslims since the events of 11th September 2001. It describes the formation, composition and discourse of this sphere drawing on data gathered from books, articles, lectures and interviews with key participants. The data reveal a marked tension, indeed a polarization, amongst Evangelicals, with an increasingly sharp disagreement between ‘confrontationalists’ and ‘conciliators’. A detailed analysis of the interaction of this sphere with Muslims, the national media and church leaders follows, leading to a concluding discussion of the future trajectory of the British Evangelical movement. Whilst it is still too early to say whether Evangelicalism will be strengthened or weakened, its encounter with Islam is likely to be an increasingly significant factor in British public life for the foreseeable future.
JAAR 85 (2017): 277-80
2006
Two books, Islam & the West Post 9/11 1 and Islam and the West: reflections from Australia, 2 cover a range of theoretical issues, regional-specific topics and case studies that explore issues related to the theme of Islam and the West. These are but two in a great flood of publications. Interest in contemporary Islam is high. The stakes are high. If global warming is a cause for concern, the idea of an interreligious meltdown between Islam and Christianity-which between them encompass the majority of the entire population of the globe-cannot be lightly brushed aside, given today the upsurge in "fundamentalist" (I use this expression cautiously) ideologies and related assertive, even terrorist, activities. But there are two other recent books which argue, in effect, that a meltdown is by no means inevitable, and that, indeed, the prospect for friendship between the peoples of these two great religions is eminently possible and supremely to be desired. Seyyed Hossein Nasr, in his The Heart of Islam: Enduring Values for Humanity, remarks that "Islam is an inalienable and inseparable part of the Abrahamic family of religions and considers itself to be closely linked with the two monotheistic religions that preceded it. Islam envisages itself the complement of those religions and the final expression of
2011
The paper looks historically at factors in Europe that affected Christian interaction with Muslims before 9/11. It then considers what has happened since, with the greatly increased profile of Islam caused by several factors outlined. It considers changes within Christian and Muslim Communities, and at Christian responses to Islam. An extensive section considers contemporary approaches to mission with Muslims theologically and practically, in ten areas. The conclusion provides evidence for why Europe in general, and Britain in particular, are pivotal for the development of a constructive approach to Muslim Christian relations, and a sensitive approach to mission. Mission and Muslims in the Contemporary British and European Contexts The context has changed drastically since the Edinburgh Conference of 1910. At that point, engagement with Islam was something happening elsewhere, within the old ‘mission field.’ This meant, in the main, the Middle East, parts of Africa and the Asian sub...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.