Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
8 pages
1 file
PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN FISIKA JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA DAN IPA FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN UNIVERSITAS LAMBUNG MANGKURAT BANJARMASIN 2017 2 KATA PENGANTAR Segala puji bagi Allah SWT, yang telah melimpahkan segala rahmat dan hidayah-Nya sehingga makalah ini dapat terselesaikan. Shalawat serta salam kita limpahkan kepada junjungan Nabi Agung, Nabi Muhammad SAW yang kita tunggu-tunggu syafaatnya nanti di hari akhir. Kami ucapkan terima kasih kepada Bapak Abdul Salam M., M.Pd selaku dosen pengampu mata kuliah Perencanaan Pembelajaran Fisika yang telah memberikan banyak ilmu dan pengarahan.
Perbedaan struktur penulisan antara RPP KTSP dan KURTILAS
The background of this research is that there are still some of senior high school headmasters in Tanah Datar (Kab) who still don't understand in implementing KTSP, based on their knowledge, understanding and their capability. This is a descriptive research. All of the sample were taken from all is population. This research used quistionaire and semantic differensial model to collect the data. The data were analyzed using average score formula. This research shows: 1) Senior high school headmasters are categorized quite ready in knowledge side to implement KTSP in Tanah Datar (Kab), with average score 8,21; 2) Senior high school headmasters are categirized quite ready in undestanding side to implement KTSP in Tanah Datar (Kab), with average score 7,88; 3) Senior high school headmasters are categorized quite ready in their capability to implement KTSP in Tanah Datar (Kab), with average score 8,20. Generally, senior high school are categorized quite ready to implement KTSP, with the total average score is 8,09
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.