Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
28 pages
1 file
This paper investigates the literary connections between Pliny the Younger and Quintus Aurelius Symmachus, challenging assumptions of direct influence from Pliny on Symmachus's letter writing. While initial similarities may suggest a literary heirship, the analysis reveals significant structural and conceptual differences, particularly in their approaches to letters and panegyrics. The examination also highlights Symmachus's engagement with Pliny's panegyric, alongside contextual factors that may have influenced literary exchanges during the early years of Gratian's reign.
in J. Soldo and C.R. Jackson and (eds.), res vera, res ficta: Fictionality in Ancient Epistolography, (De Gruyter), pp. 19-42, 2023
Pliny stands at the intersection between epistolary (biographical) fiction and fact. He is routinely studied by two academic constituencies whose critical assumptions do not necessarily align: ancient historians and literary critics. Statements about biographical fiction in Pliny often proceed from unargued assumptions about 'how literature works'-assumptions generally derived from study of the Augustan poets. I argue that assumptions about autobiographical fiction in Ovid cannot simply be transferred to Pliny. We need to construct individual theories for individual authors, working from the text up to personalized theory, rather than from generalized theory down to text. The Augustan poetry book is central to the development of Latin letter collections (in sharp contrast to the lack of influence from poetry books on the Greek epistolographical tradition). But the poetics of the two Roman forms are fundamentally different. In Ovid's Amores, the signifier is centripetal and returns to reflect on its own programmatic status within a collection; but Pliny's letters are centrifugal and generally move outwards from internal signifier to external signified. Prospects for reading events in Pliny's life as primarily instantiations of a literary programme are diminished.
Journal of Early Christian Studies, 2007
Classica Cracoviensia, 2022
Relationes 10−12 stand out from Q.A. Symmachus' reports written to give an account of his activities at the position of the prefect of Rome (praefectus urbis Romae). These three relationes were written and sent by Symmachus to Roman emperors to inform them of the death of V.A. Praetextatus, who was a famous and influential Roman dignitary as well as Symmachus' close friend. Rel. 10−12 are not only thematically related, but also-unlike the rest of the reports − clearly marked with personal and laudatory accents and thus their nature significantly differs from the formal documents sent to emperors from the chancellery of an imperial administrative dignitary. In this paper, we aim at presenting Rel. 10−12 as an elogium, in which in three separate reports Symmachus included a coherent eulogy of Praetextatus and presented his idealized portrait tinged with his own personal feelings, underpinned by the aspects of conservative ideology cultivated then within the circles of the Roman senatorial aristocracy. KEYWORDS: Quintus Aurelius Symmachus, Roman political prose of the 4 th century AD, relationes 2 Cf. Symm. Rel. 25, 3: sub ipso aestatis exordio (at the beginning of summer of 384 AD). Symmachus seems to have taken up the position of the prefect of Rome probably on 29 July 384 AD as we may conclude from the date given by Symmachus at the very end of Rel. 23: ss IIII Kl. Aug.
Review of A. N. Sherwin-White, Commentary on the Letters of Pliny (Oxford 1966), with particular reference to prosopography.
This paper explores in truncated form the life, literature, and legacy of Pliny the Elder. It will highlight and discuss potential branches of further interest and inquiry that stem from the exploration, and draw some conclusions and applications from the study.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 2009
Museum Helveticum 75: 155-168, 2018
The Classical Quarterly, 2017
Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies
Arethusa 46.2, Spring 2013, pp. 195-216
Arethusa 46.2 (2013) 289-312
Archimède. Archéologie et histoire ancienne, 2018
International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 2017
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne 107 , 2018
Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London, 2018