Academia.eduAcademia.edu

THE APOCALYPSES IN THE NEW PSEUDEPIGRAPHA

The publication of The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (henceforth OTP), edited by J.H. Charlesworth, 1 is a major eVent for the current renaissance of pseudepigrapha studies and for biblical studies generally. The purpose of this article is to offer some assessment of the treatment of apocalyptic literature in vol 1 of OTP, 2 with the interests of NT students and scholars especially in mind. OTP is the first collected edition of the pseudepigrapha in English translation since 1913, when The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament (henceforth APOT), edited by R.H. Charles, was published. Its most obvious difference from APOT is the very much larger number of works which are included. .¿ΡΟΓ contained only six apocalyptic works (4 Ezra, 2 Baruch, 3 Baruch, 1 Enoch, 2 Enoch, and Sib. Or. 3-5). OTP includes these six, three of them in longer forms (4 Ezra with the additional chs. 1-2,15-16; 2 Enoch with the final chs. 69-73; and the complete collection oí Sib. Or. 1-14), and in addition thirteen other works in its section 'Apocalyptic Literature and Related Works'. None of these thirteen appear in APOT. In fact there are also two more works which really belong in this section of 077, since they are unambiguously apocalypses (Ladder of Jacob and Ascension of Isaiah), but which have been assigned to vol 2? OTFs selection of apocalypses is also larger than that projected for the series Jüdische Schriften aus hellenistisch-römischer Zeit (henceforth JSHRZ) or included in The Apocryphal Old Testament, edited by H.F.D. Sparks. 4 Of course, biblical scholars have never depended solely on APOT for their knowledge of the pseudepigrapha, but it has tended to influence their sense of the range of pseudepigraphical works which are really relevant as 'background' to the NT. Certainly, the common views of the character of ancient Jewish apocalyptic have been