Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Nigeria is already in her 50th year as an independent nation, and has been involved in all types of government and leadership in the past half a century. Being a milestone in the life of the country, a review of her foreign policy within the period is germane. There seems to be a debate as to whether Nigeria’s foreign policy has been consistent over the decades or whether it has been changing. The popular argument in the literature is that it has been very consistent. Employing the decision-making theory for analytical purposes, this paper notes that although there has been a relatively consistent foreign policy thrust that has characteristically been pro-African, yet there have been changes as leaders come and go, and as they tend to impose their personalities in the attainment of foreign policy objectives of the Nigerian State. This portends a lot of inconsistencies. This paper thus examines the effect of changes in leadership on the overall framework and direction of Nigeria’s foreign policy. The paper finally recommends the actions that Nigeria needs now to forestall the downward spiral in her foreign relations and development.
We are in a world where states although independent but are interdependent as no state is an isolate, moreso, where no state could provide all her needs, yearnings and aspirations for her teeming population. The idea of foreign policy dates back to antiquity. The state is seen as the major actor in international politics and therefore all the relations of its people, agencies and institutions are reflections of its policy. However, it is interesting to note that people "s natural desire or impulse to travel, trade, do business and maintain religious links are made possible by the state but are sometimes independent of its policy hence sometimes policies are reframmed in line with these impulses. The writer looked at Nigerian foreign policy retrospectively taken into account the national interest based on the socio-political and economic environments at the time under consideration. The author found out that there is always no permanent enemy or friend, rather permanent interest, successive government reframmed our foreign policies accordingly. The researcher observed that foreign policy without crystal clear objectives informed by well defined national interest affects, contradicts and weakens the implementation of our foreign policy option at the time under reference. The author concluded that for our foreign policy to stand the test of time, it must be comprehensively considered in the light of our national interest taking into account the principles and determinants in the light of legal equality of states. This paper relied on secondary sources of materials, global, and national occurrence of events at the time.
Nigeria is already in her 50th year as an independent nation, and has been involved in all types of government and leadership in the past half a century. Being a milestone in the life of the country, a review of her foreign policy within the period is germane. There seems to be a debate as to whether Nigeria’s foreign policy has been consistent over the decades or whether it has been changing. The popular argument in the literature is that it has been very consistent. Employing the decision-making theory for analytical purposes, this paper notes that although there has been a relatively consistent foreign policy thrust that has characteristically been pro-African, yet there have been changes as leaders come and go, and as they tend to impose their personalities in the attainment of foreign policy objectives of the Nigerian State. This portends a lot of inconsistencies. This paper thus examines the effect of changes in leadership on the overall framework and direction of Nigeria’s foreign policy. The paper finally recommends the actions that Nigeria needs now to forestall the downward spiral in her foreign relations and development.
This paper expresses the continuity and discontinuities in the Nigerian foreign policy from 1960. After a peaceful transition from colonial rule, Nigeria evolved into an independent state that controlled her own affairs both domestically and internationally. In order to relate with the outside she developed a set of principles and objectives to guide such official relations. However, it has not been always smooth, as the Nigerian foreign policy experienced some ups and downs. This paper analysis the extent to which the different eras of her foreign policy was successful and unsuccessful
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2015
Recent studies by Aluko, Macridis, Anyaele and Akinboye depicts Nigeria's foreign policy as being chameleon in nature, a foreign policy constantly in a state of flux as a result of internal and external dynamics inherent in any given administration or regime. In the case of Nigeria, the formation of Nigeria's foreign policy has gone through 14 different administrations through the external affairs ministry in the past 53 years, out of which 35 years were during military regimes. Consequently, there has been a plethora of conceptual, ideological and psychological postulations of policies in Nigeria's foreign policy machinery, most of which were born out of a crave and selfish hunger for an identity that would leave a lasting impression about the various administrations or regimes in question While adopting the traditional critical methods of analysis in philosophy to analyze relevant data, archival materials, texts and the major conceptual and ideological constructs proposed as foundations which upholds the main trusts of Nigeria's foreign policy, the paper shall strive to show via contextual and conceptual analysis of all the data collected for the study, the reason for policy failure and abandonment in Nigeria's foreign policy machinery. Aside the existence of a weak institution of leadership, the study identifies the continued insistence on an Afrocentric foreign policy by past administrations as one of the major negative influence on Nigeria's foreign policy trust. The ideological and psychological crave by each administration to formulate unique foreign policies ares also identified as inimical to the policy formulations initiatives since they are not grounded in deep philosophical thought. The study recommends a strong paradigm shift and a positive transformation plan which will have the capacity to reverse the degeneration that presently looms the diplomatic practice in the face.
International Journal in Managemen t and Social Science, 2017
The nature and policy orientation of Nigeria’s Foreign Policy under President Olusegun Obasanjo (1999-2007) deals with the measurement of Nigeria State or nation at the time. Nigeria is a regional power with gaining sense of self-assurance and a developing capability to demonstrate it. This research principally attempts to underscore through historical, descriptive and comparative analysis, low strategies for perceiving Nigeria’s foreign policies were configured in managing political economy of Nigeria’s administration of Chief Olusegun Obasoanjo (1999-2007). There is an abundance of evidence to show that internal policies constitute the key to Nigeria’s foreign policy. The research reveals that the era of the second coming of Chief Olusegun Obasanjo as Nigerian president between 1999 and 2007 did not witness the inauguration and implementation of a dynamic and people-oriented foreign policy dedicated to the realization of Nigeria’s national interests. It was also established as a fact that international politics is the true personification of power politics and also the veritable consummation of aligment to ones national interests. This research therefore, among other things recommended that the country Nigeria must no longer operate in such a way as to be seen as anybody’s good boy as such a posture is symptomatic of weakness and servility. But ensure that the national interest always take precedence to morality in international politics.
There is no doubt that Nigeria " s foreign policy is indeed outdated. This is evidenced in the fact that we now live in different times. Though Nigeria " s role in Africa still remains significant, however, the time " Africa " was made the centre piece of Nigeria " s foreign policy, was a time when many countries in the continent were struggling to throw off the yolk of colonialism. And the adoption of such a policy was to stand in solidarity with those nations that were struggling to achieve or gain independence. And today, no single country in the continent is under foreign rule or direct control, and the times now call for a review of Nigeria " s foreign policy to reflect the nations current circumstances and realities among the committee of states across the globe. And there is no time than under the present administration of President Muhammadu Buhari. The Buhari administration must look critically and make an assessment of how and which way to dir...
The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 2020
The attempt to go chronological has robbed Nigeria's foreign policy sufficient analytical depth. Nigeria's foreign policy has been narrative as most scholars tend to give historical description of foreign policy events. Such approach has not allowed for in-depth analysis and detection of fundamental defects. This paper examines the process of Nigeria's foreign policy formulation from the structuralist defects teasing out major challenges which affect the emergence of a foreign policy that is strategic. This paper employs the system approach to demonstrate the ineffectiveness of a one-off analysis of Nigeria's foreign policy to the extent that all issues raised can be applied to discourse of Nigeria's foreign policy at all time. The paper concludes that to surmount its challenges, Nigeria's foreign policy needs to establish a coordinate between its goals and the means to achieve them to attain a focused, structured and strategic foreign policy.
Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 2017
This research paper provided a comparative analysis of foreign policy of Nigeria under Muhammadu Buhari's military regime 1983-1985 and his current civilian administration which started in May 2015. Foreign policy is a set of tools or activities developed by states to drive its interest in the international system, and internal and external factors usually influence this. The personality and environment of which leaders assumes leadership also plays an important in defining a state foreign policy. The objective of this paper is to provide a comparative analysis of Buhari's foreign policy under his military and civilian administration. The research utilizes secondary data from journals, books, newspapers, government reports among others. The findings of the study shows the under Buhari's military administration relations between Nigeria and ECOWAS was hostile which led to border closures, relations with Nigeria's former colonial master, United Kingdom was also strained due which resulted to diplomatic rows between both countries, the Buhari administration also continued with Afrocentric policy with continuous call for end to apartheid and colonialism on the continent. While under his civilian government Buhari was able to create friendly relations with ECOWAS member nations, maintained good relations with UK and US, and improve the countries relations with China to improve the country's economy. The paper concludes that the type of government and environment in the international system with which Buhari served played a role in shaping the foreign policy direction of the state.
International Research Journal of Human Resources and Social Sciences, 2017
This study is an evaluation of Nigeria’s Foreign Policy under President Olusegun Obasanjo(1999-2007). This research aimed to provide a detailed background to Nigeria’s foreign policy under during the above mentioned regime, with a focus on finding out if the then Nigeria’s foreign policy was geared toward the realization of her national interest. There is an abundance of evidence to show that internal policies constitute the key to Nigeria’s foreign policy. The research reveals that there is no altruism in international politics and that countries in all instance work to actualize their national interests also that the era of the second coming of Chief Olusegun Obasanjo as Nigerian president between 1999 and 2007 did not witness the inauguration and implementation of a dynamic and people-oriented foreign policy dedicated to the realization of Nigeria’s national interests. This research among other things recommendations that Nigerian foreign policy should aim at creating benefits for the betterment of the people. It should no longer focus on Africa without clearly defined policy objectives and that Africa and its crop of inept leaders must as of necessity revisit their modus operandi in domestic politicoeconomic matters as in the manifestation of their foreign policy.
AFRREV IJAH: An International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 2016
Nigeria's foreign policy like those of every other elsewhere, is hoped to achieve for the benefit of Nigeria and Nigerians, the aspired goals and articulated interests of the Nigerian state. This expectation, by the judgment of many informed Nigerians, is yet to be fully realized. Nigeria's foreign policy inter alia, has failed to work out the transformation of Nigeria's status and Nigerians' lives from where it is, to where it should be. What possibly could answer for this foreign policy failure? In response to the puzzle, this paper excurses into the mixed and myriad challenges that have vexed Nigeria's foreign policy from the formative years of her foreign policy formulation and implementation to the present. The finding is that the persistence of these challenges due to neglect, bad and irresponsible leadership is debilitating to Nigeria's foreign policy output and has made foreign policy performance leave much to be desired. The paper concludes with a number of recommended suggestions as a panacea to the identified teething challenges.
The aim of this research is to analyze the foreign policy of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, focusing on the various changes that took place in Nigerian foreign policy since Independent, and specifically upon the election of President M. Buhari. It sets out to explain these changes and classify them through the analysis of Ogidan.P. Damilola and the theoretical model developed by Charles F. Hermann in his article " Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy " , attempting to answer the following question: which are the most influential factors in shaping Nigeria " s foreign policy since independence? The paper holds that there is a mix of internal causes and exogenous factors determining the course of Nigerian foreign policy. Foreign policy is basically the mirror of domestic policy, but it will be insufficient, this be the only focus on analysis, as the most important factors in this analysis is both domestic and external.
2017
Nigeria’s foreign policy has navigated from the colonial conservation of Britain to a more dynamic trend that is Afrocentric which was introduced by the Gowon and Mohammed administrations. Both domestic and external factors propelled the Nigerian state to alter its foreign policy outreach thereafter. This paper examines the dynamic trend of Nigeria foreign policy from independence to 1999 when the military took their exit and handed over power to a democratically-elected government. A cursory focus of the policy thrusts of various regimes was x-rayed and the different factors that were responsible for their emergence. From the examination the paper made findings which include that Nigeria’s foreign policy like other nation states is dynamic and responsive to its environments. It was concluded that Nigeria indeed has reached a zenith in realizing her objectives and recommended among others that there is need to involve a stable polity in the country.
Before and after independence, Nigeria has been the chief architect and chief negotiator of peace throughout Africa. Consequently, Nigeria became the main operator of the engine room of African independence movement in the 1950s, and especially after its own independence 1960. Not surprisingly that after independence, Nigeria’s external relations generally has been characterized by a focus on Africa and the attachment to these fundamental principles and objectives of African unity and independence, peaceful settlement of disputes, non-alignment and regional economic co-operation and development. Thus, Nigeria’s foreign policy since independence in 1960, has consistently been guided by these same principles and objectives, especially the promotion of her national interest and the policy of afro-centricity vise- a-vise her capability to exercise hegemonic influence in the region. In carrying out these fundamental principles and objectives, while the main thrust of Nigeria’s foreign policy remained permanent and largely the same, from regime to regime, however, witnessed various adjustments and modifications, depending on the orientation of the political leaderships. Using content analysis, this paper examines the development of Nigeria’s foreign policy since independence in 1960. It also identifies issues, strategies and constraints involved; the challenges and milestones of Nigeria’s international relations generally, from regime to regime, within the fifty years of its existence as an independent country.
2019
This paper discusses the Nigerian foreign policy in the West African sub-region and the attendant challenges. It focuses on the nature of this policy which is basically Afrocentric. The paper as a result dwelt on the idealism of the policy itself as some scholars posit in terms of the relations between Nigeria and these countries in the sub-region. The paper adopts the descriptive research from library instruments and findings show that, issues involved are quite pervasive and problematic to the effective projection of the country's foreign policy in the sub-region. The examination of these issues, some of which are traceable to the country's domestic economic and political setting have become pertinent in order to reduce the seeming misunderstanding and mistrust of Nigeria's noble and progressive gesture towards her fellow African neighbors. The paper concludes that Nigerian foreign policy even in the West African Sub-region has been influenced by its African focus. This scenario inevitably conferred on the country, the status of a sub-regional leader in all ramifications. The paper recommends that the Nigerian authorities must regard and treat its West Africa neighbour as strategic. This has become important as it can be harnessed as a verifiable market for the country's goods and services to the reduction of outside rivals.
It is cogent to say that the foundation of Nigeria’s foreign policy was laid at the point of her independence. The administration of her foreign policy was conceived prior to her independence in 1957, during which the training of those who paved the way for an independent Nigeria took place. It is pertinent to note here that at this point, Nigeria was only involved in external relations from time to time with the United Kingdom and a few other countries, hence, this paper seeks to examine the role that Nigeria played during this period in the leadership of Africa, all through to the fourth republic, till date. This paper will also make use of conceptual clarifications of the term foreign policy as well as identify the issues Nigeria has faced and is facing in the leadership of Africa from 1960-date and will also attempt a discuss on the issues facing Nigeria in her quest to maintain her leadership position in the African continent.
Nigerian foreign policy thrust commenced in 1960 after the attainment of political sovereignty from Britain. Africa was projected as the centrepiece of Nigeria's external decisions. Every successive administration continued to emphasize and expand the principles of Nigeria's Foreign Policy decisions on Africa. Besides afrocentricism, the foreign policy served the interest of Mr President, ruling and business elites, and the ordinary citizens abroad. The previous governments showed little or no concern about the welfare of her citizens abroad. However, in 2007, the Nigerian government adopted citizen's diplomacy as her foreign policy thrust, whose aim was geared toward mobilizing the support of Nigerians at home and diaspora to develop the country economically and politically. Though, Citizen's diplomacy was misconstrued initially. The misrepresentation was anchored on the fact Nigeria has abandoned her traditional approach foreign policy thrust (afrocentricism) to Nigeria's citizens at home and diaspora. However, citizen diplomacy underscores the protection of Nigeria's image and integrity at home and abroad. At present, President Buhari's administration's foreign policy drive focused on Nigerians at diaspora as never before. Therefore, the paper aimed at examining the changing nature of Nigeria's foreign policy thrust; and its beneficiaries. The paper adopted a Concentric Circles model as its analytical construct. The paper recommends amongst others that Nigerian government should design robust economic programmes that are geared towards improving and enhancing economic development predicated on creating employment opportunities, encouraging local production, curbing corruption and supporting the industrial infrastructure.
International Journal of Advanced Research
2013
Since becoming a sovereign nation in 1960, the nation called Nigeria had engaged herself with the world on a weak foreign policy that had saw the nation part away with a huge chuck of her human and economic resources without having something tangible to show for her huge diplomatic generosity. This has become worrisome to scholars, and stakeholders within the nation-space. To some, Nigeria only operates a father xmas style of foreign policy which had someway contributed to the economic misery of the nation. In light of the above, the article set-out to investigate certain issues in Nigeria foreign policy statement. To this end, the paper focuses on issues such as national interest which drives the nation’s foreign policy coupled with the continuities as well as the flaws associated with Nigeria policy of external relations since attainment of independence. The paper argues that Nigeria should embark on a reform of her foreign policy as a matter of urgency as what obtains presently c...
This study evaluated the principles of Nigeria's foreign policy since 1960. These principles include: Non-alignment; Equality of all States; Non-interference in the domestic affairs of other states, Multilateralism and Afrocentrism. The methodology of the study was based on secondary sources of data collection. Data obtained from textbooks, journals, articles, news papers and other online materials were analyzed by descriptive method, while the theory of Manifest Destiny was adopted. The findings showed that while these principles have helped in shaping Nigeria's relations with the outside world over the years, there are inconsistencies in their application; additionally some of them do not reflect the trend and current realities locally and internationally. For instance, Nigeria professed non-alignment during the cold war era but was committed to the Western led bloc with respect to issues in Africa and beyond. Also the principle of afrocentrism has been adopted to the detriment www.ichekejournal.com Nigeria Foreign Policy Principles since 1960 2 of her very own citizens. Till date, Nigeria has continued to bear the burdens of Africa without commensurate rewards whereas the majority of her citizens experience, on a daily basis, poverty, diseases, hunger, starvations and deaths. In view of this, the study recommends a holistic review of Nigeria's foreign policy principles to be in line with the current realities at the domestic and international levels. In addition attention should be given to those areas of foreign engagements that will boost the economic fortune of the country; instead of focusing on Africa, Nigeria should place more emphasis on the welfare of its citizens as it is often said, "Charity begins at home".
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.