An ontogenetic perspective on individual differences
2015, Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society
https://doi.org/10.1098/RSPB.2015.1050…
9 pages
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
Phenotypic differences among individuals can arise during any stage of life. Although several distinct processes underlying individual differences have been defined and studied (e.g. parental effects, senescence), we lack an explicit, unified perspective for understanding how these processes contribute separately and synergistically to observed variation in functional traits. We propose a conceptual framework based on a developmental view of life-history variation, linking each ontogenetic stage with the types of individual differences originating during that period. In our view, the salient differences among these types are encapsulated by three key criteria: timing of onset, when fitness consequences are realized, and potential for reversibility. To fill a critical gap in this framework, we formulate a new term to refer to individual differences generated during adulthood-reversible state effects. We define these as 'reversible changes in a functional trait resulting from life...
Related papers
Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2017
Functional Ecology, 2007
An ontogenetic perspective on the relationship between age and size at maturity Abstract 1. Understanding the relationship between age and size at maturity is essential because these traits are pivotal determinants of an organism's fitness. 2. The relationship between age and size is commonly addressed using optimization and quantitative genetic approaches. Here we argue that the value of such studies is often limited by an insufficient consideration of organismal ontogeny. 3. On the basis of a simple conceptual framework of hierarchical resource allocation, we identify key aspects of ontogeny that prove critical to a fuller understanding of the relationship between age and size, and which, to date, have been insufficiently explored. In particular, these include intrinsic variation in growth rate within and among populations, and the physiological nature of the maturation process that coordinates growth and reproductive function in an organism. 4. We also provide some guidance to the empirical investigation of these aspects, anticipating that a wider theoretical, but especially empirical appreciation of ontogenetic detail will greatly increase the explanatory and predictive power of life-history studies.
New Phytologist, 2017
SummaryThere is renewed interest in how transgenerational environmental effects, including epigenetic inheritance, contribute to adaptive evolution. The contribution of across‐generation plasticity to adaptation, however, needs to be evaluated within the context of within‐generation plasticity, which is often proposed to contribute more efficiently to adaptation because of the potentially greater accuracy of progeny than parental cues to predict progeny selective environments. We highlight recent empirical studies of transgenerational plasticity, and find that they do not consistently support predictions based on the higher predictive ability of progeny environmental cues. We discuss these findings within the context of the relative predictive ability of maternal and progeny cues, costs and constraints of plasticity in parental and progeny generations, and the dynamic nature of the adaptive value of within‐ and across‐generation plasticity that varies with the process of adaptation ...
The Journal of nutrition, 2007
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012
Individuals within populations can differ substantially in their life span and their lifetime reproductive success but such realized individual variation in fitness components need not reflect underlying heritable fitness differences visible to natural selection. Even so, biologists commonly argue that large differences in fitness components are likely adaptive, resulting from and driving evolution by natural selection. To examine this argument we use unique formulas to compute exactly the variance in life span and in lifetime reproductive success among individuals with identical (genotypic) vital rates (assuming a common genotype for all individuals). Such individuals have identical fitness but vary substantially in their realized individual fitness components. We show by example that our computed variances and corresponding simulated distribution of fitness components match those observed in real populations. Of course, (genotypic) vital rates in real populations are expected to differ by small but evolutionarily important amounts among genotypes, but we show that such differences only modestly increase variances in fitness components. We conclude that observed differences in fitness components may likely be evolutionarily neutral, at least to the extent that they are indistinguishable from distributions generated by neutral processes. Important consequences of large neutral variation are the following: Heritabilities for fitness components are likely to be small (which is in fact the case), small selective differences in life histories will be hard to measure, and the effects of random drift will be amplified in natural populations by the large variances among individuals. demography | matrix model | age-stage structure | Markov chain | dynamics L ongitudinal studies of humans and other species show that individuals within a population often differ greatly in age at death and lifetime reproduction (1-4). For example, the SD of human age at death was ∼40% of life expectancy (∼35 y) in the early 1800s and ∼20% in the late 1900s even with a much higher life expectancy (∼70 y) (3). Lifetime reproduction of human females in high-fertility societies had a SD-to-mean ratio [coefficient of variation (CV)] of ∼0.5-1, and there was much greater variability in male lifetime reproduction (5, 6). Such variation obviously leads us to ask, Do the longest-lived individuals (or the most prolific reproducers) differ from other individuals because of heritable genetic differences? Many researchers assume the answer is "yes" (7-10), because both age at death and lifetime reproduction should be related to fitness (although they are not fitness, which is a property of genotypes as we discuss below) (Box 1). However, the desired genetic variation need not exist. For example, populations of genetically identical nematodes in the laboratory display substantial variation in age at death with CV ∼ 0.2. This variation is clearly not due to genetic differences, but is generated by stochastic variation during development (11). In this and other examples, individual fates are shaped by a sequence of stochastic events over the life course that generate substantial variation in the age at death . Many other examples of the importance of stochastic events are discussed by Finch and Kirkwood (15). In general, then, should we expect large stochastic variation in age at death, lifetime reproduction, and other measures of individual performance? Here we show that the answer is yes and that this stochastic variation has significant implications for both ecological and evolutionary studies.
Current Anthropology, 2012
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Ecology and Evolution, 2018
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2019
We develop a conceptual framework that connects biological heredity and organization. Heredity designates the cross-generation conservation of functional elements, defined as constraints subject to organizational closure. While hereditary objects are functional constituents of biological systems, any other entity that is stable across generations—and possibly involved in the recurrence of phenotypes—belongs to their environment. The central outcome of the organizational perspective consists in extending the scope of heredity beyond the genetic domain without merging it with the broad category of cross-generation stability. After discussing some implications, we conclude with a reflection on the relationship between stability and variation.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1998
Recently, the adaptive significance of maternal effects has been increasingly recognized. No longer are maternal effects relegated as simple `troublesome sources of environmental resemblance' that confound our ability to estimate accurately the genetic basis of traits of interest. Rather, it has become evident that many maternal effects have been shaped by the action of natural selection to act as a mechanism for adaptive phenotypic response to environmental heterogeneity. Consequently, maternal experience is translated into variation in offspring fitness.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.