STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT II - Syllabus

Handbook of Strategy and Management

Why do firms do what they do? Why does one cut prices while its neighbor buys out competitors? Why does one diversify into new industries while its neighbor spins off subsidiaries to focus on its core competence? Why do some strategies rise while others fall? These are central concerns of both strategic management theorists and economic sociologists. We bring the two fields together to discuss their approaches to these questions with the goal of encouraging dialogue and cross-fertilization. Each field provides a snapshot of firm behavior from a particular vantage point. When these snapshots are integrated, something closer to a three-dimensional view of the firm appears.

2014

Strategic management is a relatively youthful discipline that has steadily matured over the past fifty years. The field has become consolidated over this period, while simultaneously expanding the range of topics analyzed and research methodologies used. Different theories and approaches, addressing different research topics, have been developed to explain the reasons underlying firms' competitive advantage and success. In this paper, we posit the existence of two pendulums in constant motion that, on the one hand, reflect the tension that has historically existed between the focus on internal firm factors and external environmental attributes respectively and, on the other hand, the tension between a more macro level of analysis, i.e., the firm and its environment, and a more micro level one, i.e., individuals and their relations within the firm. The frontier of research in strategic management is shaped by the simultaneous movement of both pendulums.

It is commonly asserted that the field of strategic management is fragmented and lacks a coherent identity. This skepticism, however, is paradoxically at odds with the great success that strategic management has enjoyed. How might one explain this paradox? We seek answers to this question by relying first on a large-scale survey of strategic management scholars from which we derive an implicit consensual definition of the field-as tacitly held by its members. We then supplement this implicit definition with an examination of the espoused definitions of the field obtained from a group of boundary-spanning scholars. Our findings suggest that strategic management's success as a field emerges from an underlying consensus that enables it to attract multiple perspectives, while still maintaining its coherent distinctiveness.

La evolución de la investigación en dirección estratégica: Tendencias recientes y nuevos caminos Resumen La dirección estratégica es una disciplina relativamente joven que ha ido adquiriendo su madurez durante los últimos 50 años. A lo largo de este período ha ido consolidando su personalidad a la vez que aumentaba la variedad de tópicos analizados y de metodologías utilizadas en sus investigaciones. Con el fin de explicar las razones del éxito empresarial-ventaja competitiva-, se han ido desarrollando diferentes teorías y enfoques que han ido cubriendo distintos aspectos de la investigación. Los autores plantean la existencia de dos péndulos que se mueven constantemente y que reflejan la tensión que históricamente ha existido entre la atención a los factores internos o el predominio del entorno, por un lado, y la tensión entre el nivel macro de análisis, la empresa y el entorno, o el nivel micro, los individuos y sus relaciones. La frontera de la investigación en dirección estratégica quedaría así definida por el movimiento simultáneo de ambos péndulos. Strategic management is a relatively youthful discipline that has steadily matured over the past fifty years. The field has become consolidated over this period, while simultaneously expanding the range of topics analyzed and research methodologies used. Different theories and approaches, addressing different research topics, have been developed to explain the reasons underlying firms’ competitive advantage and success. In this paper, we posit the existence of two pendulums in constant motion that, on the one hand, reflect the tension that has historically existed between the focus on internal firm factors and external environmental attributes respectively and, on the other hand, the tension between a more macro level of analysis, i.e., the firm and its environment, and a more micro level one, i.e., individuals and their relations within the firm. The frontier of research in strategic management is shaped by the simultaneous movement of both pendulums.

Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 2015

As editors of the Wiley Encyclopedia of Management 3e, Vol. 12 Strategic Management, we aim to provide business practitioners, academics, and students of the field with a comprehensive reference relating to strategy concepts, methods, and techniques to reflect the dynamism of industry practice and academic knowledge. The juxtaposition of concepts, methods and techniques reflects the need for clarity in strategic thought as well as practicality in strategy implementation. As an encyclopedia, this volume provides a broad coverage of the field and an accessible framework for investigating its subject matter. The Strategic Management volume has been compiled through a collaborative network of over 50 professors and industry leaders from universities, business schools, and business organizations from all parts of the globe. The result is a contemporary, dynamic, and global view of strategy, which represents cutting edge thinking in the world of corporate and societal management. The text is designed to be accessible to readers from different backgrounds who contribute to the design, implementation, and use of strategy at various levels in their organizations. The ease of access to the wealth of information embodied in the encyclopedia is made possible through the modular nature of the publication whereby each strategy concept can be searched online and retrieved separately. We developed a comprehensive list of contemporary strategy topics for the third edition by looking at research published over the past decade in top academic journals, reputable industry publications, and the dominant logic of the frameworks of strategy in academic textbooks.We then organized these topics into distinct strategy themes to enable individual topics to be related to broader streams of strategic thought. The result was a significantly updated list of topics from previous editions, made up of 210 topics, 36 of which are new additions with most of the remainder being heavily revised. The new entries come mainly from the rapidly evolving nature of strategy as reflected in the content of popular textbooks on strategy and new approaches to strategic leadership advocated in business schools. There are three distinct fields that are attracting more attention in the field of strategy, which may not constitute a new core but will certainly enrich the way we think about strategy. The new themes revolve around three areas: complex behavior in organizations and industries, the psychological foundations of strategy, and strategic innovation as an area that focuses on the renewal of managerial cognition and on the responses of organizations and industries to contentious and difficult environments. Another area that has gained more citations and more interest from academics and executives in the past few years is cooperation and collaboration, which is being linked to our understanding of complex adaptive behavior. The evolution of the key terms and concepts in the encyclopedia reflects a move toward organizational strategies and resource-based views that have emerged in response to competition, regulation, social trends, and technological innovation. Our approach to building this compendium of strategic management is both conceptual and practical. Strategic management is a performance-driven discipline, with an ingrained competitive stance, that sets out to condition long-term futures. With this mindset in place, one of the major shifts in strategic thinking has been to recognize the centrality of resources and capabilities as the foundation of long-term superior results and the need to create and execute strategic plans that utilize these resources. Therefore, the resource-based view has a much more significant influence in the field of strategy. The practicalities of how the resource-based view can be captured into workable core competences and later on into dynamic capabilities that outpace the competition, will be on center stage in the foreseeable future. The nature of dynamic capabilities links back to complex adaptive behavior, a field that is yet to evolve into a robust practical toolbox for strategic decision makers. The third edition is being published in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, a crisis that has shattered many comfortable illusions about the stability of the global economy and the health and resilience of many important parts of it. The year 2014 also marks a point at which the long period of globalization and intensive technological change can be observed in new structures and strategies around the world, both political and corporate. Thus the context of the field of strategy has changed immensely and we ought to ask if it has changed the nature of strategic thinking itself. The most obvious observation to make is that the nature and importance of competition has been clearly intensified. Falling real incomes have created more demand for low price offerings and differentiated offerings have to show their value proposition more clearly. Everything we know about competition is in many senses reinforced with an override that observes that time horizons have become more compressed, strategies need to pay off earlier, and value propositions will have to be readjusted more frequently. This raises a more complex point. The tension between short-term and long-term thinking has been greatly exacerbated. The 2008 crisis pointed toward rapid financial readjustments, the primacy of cost-driven survival strategies and simultaneously the need for longer term repositioning so as to be able to create the resources and flexibility for strategies to be more reactive, more adaptive and yet more durable. Are we to see more trade-offs toward the short term or do we take from 2008 that more importance should be given to long-term durability? Part of the long-term thinking of corporations is investment and technological change. The invasion of consumer buying habits by innovations such as social networks is provoking fundamental changes in retailing and in consumer goods marketing with consequent implications for investment back down the supply chain. The pace of technical change and consumer buying habits shows no sign of diminishing. As further fuel to these changes, the significance of emerging markets has been very evident in the aftermath of 2008 with considerable visibility of China’s development into a world economic superpower (or is it going to run into bottleneck constraints and revert to more normal growth). Alongside this strand of thinking is a rethinking of globalization as a strategy. The emphasis is now on regional power coupled with increasing free trade. This is a more intricate paradigm than global standardization requiring correspondingly more complex patterns of internationalization. So change is even more positively on the agenda and the capacity to interpret and respond to contextual shifts and rapidly evolving new competitors will become a requisite core competence. Fundamentally, strategic advantage in any and all contexts is driven and fueled by the resources and capabilities of firms. The resource-based view is gaining more attention and will gain more traction in reality as firms begin to work out how to define, measure, and create core competences. The resource based view is a theory waiting for major practical advancement. Without core competences, firms are destined to be price competitors or at best rapid imitators. Long-term superior performance will accrue to those who know what are their strategic assets. The principle focus of strategy regarding the creation of wealth will continue to dominate and will remain critical to the competitive survival of firms. However, the definition of wealth in the economic literature is starting to shift toward a more holistic view that integrates financial and societal well being – a reflection probably of broader public opinion. The effect on the field of strategy is an increase in importance of areas such as corporate social responsibility as well as providing ammunition for the need for organizations to take an even longer view in spite of current short-term financial pressures. The implementation of strategy is an area that requires more attention in terms of providing a working framework of how to execute the wide variety of strategic models available in the literature. Implementation remains a minefield of mobilising financial, human, organizational and social capital, in the form of industry networks. Strategic Management Vol. 12 is a rich collection of the latest thinking on strategic management. We are indebted to our colleagues in international business schools and corporations across the globe, who have contributed with their ideas, opinions, best practices, and latest research finding. It has been a privilege to be part of this great network of strategic minds that have created this comprehensive collection of strategic management concepts.

Strategic Management Journal, 1991

This essay examines the relationship between strategic management and economics. It introduces the special issue on this same topic by providing a guide to the eight papers contained in the special issue, and it offers the guest editors viewpoints on the contributions of each discipline to the other. The essay notes the major contribution from economics has been primarily from the industrial organization literature, with promises of important gains to be made from the ‘new’ economics as it breaks away from the neoclassical theory of the firm. Contributions from strategic management to economics are noted. Areas for further research utilizing the relationship between strategic management and economics are also indicated.

Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks, 2020

Strategic management review, 2020

Research in strategic management has burgeoned in the last few decades. This growth and specialization not only reflects impressive progress but raises questions about the boundaries and future direction of the field. In an effort to promote the accumulation and integration of insights regarding strategic management we trace research in the field through a series of four generations of scholarship. In so doing, we highlight some of the most important challenges and contributions of each of these generations and note the tensions and opportunities presented by the field's focus on fundamental issues and frontier research topics. We also note the various integration mechanisms that have been called for and discuss their merits and demerits. We conclude by discussing the role of the Strategic Management Review as a complement to existing strategy journals.