Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1997, Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences
Sixty years ago, the leading lights of the economics profession chose to model economic fluctuations as if they were caused by stochastic disturbances to an underlying stable, heavily damped system, in the mistaken belief that "a mathe-matically unstable system does not fluctuate; ...
2015
Over the past four years I have experienced one of the most exciting journeys in my life. PhD is not merely about academic but also a life-changing adventure. I have to be grateful to all my colleagues and friends for their inspiration and help through this journey. I am most grateful to my supervisors Professor Cees Diks, Professor Herbert Dawid and Professor Cars Hommes for their inspiration and help. At the university of Amsterdam, Cars gave me the very first lecture on nonlinear economic dynamics. He opened the fascinating world of nonlinear dynamics for me and raised my enthusiasm for complex economic systems. Cees taught me to keep an open mind and presented me a much wider economic world by utilising the visions from all natural and social sciences. He provided me continuous help whenever and wherever I need. I could never find an other mentor as kind as him and as patient as him. In Bielefeld University, Herbert further deepened my knowledge of adaptive learning and agentbased modelling. Our regular discussions have been extremely stimulating and productive. I am grateful to my local supervisor Professor Oliver Linton when I was exchanging in the University of Cambridge as a visiting student. I thank him for always having some time for me from his intensive schedules. I really benefited from our discussions and the research activities he hosted. It was my great honour to study in this historical top university and to work with so many intelligent people.
Springer eBooks, 2022
This series offers an outlet for research in the history of economic thought. It features scholarly studies on important theoretical developments and great economic thinkers that have contributed to the evolution of the economic discipline. Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought (SSHET) welcomes proposals for research monographs, edited volumes and handbooks from a variety of disciplines that seek to study the history of economic thinking and help to arrive at a better understanding of modern economics. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, various schools of thought, important pioneers and thinkers, ancient and medieval economic thought, mercantilism, cameralism and physiocracy, classical and neoclassical economics, historical, institutional and evolutionary economics, socialism and Marxism, Keynesian, Sraffian and Austrian economics, econometrics and mathematical studies as well as economic methodology and the link between economic history and history of economic thought. All titles in this series are peer-reviewed. For further information on the series and to submit a proposal for consideration, please contact Johannes Glaeser (Senior Editor Economics) Johannes.glaeser@ springer.com.
Journal of Economic Surveys, 1990
Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 1996
The possibility of cycles and chaos arising from nonlinear dynamics in economics emerged in the literature in the 1980s, and it came as a surprise. 1 The possibility of deterministic cycles in economic models had been noted before, for example in the well-known multiplier-accelerator models, but not in equilibrium models with complete markets, no frictions, and full intertemporal arbitrage. 2 The reason for the surprise was understandable: deterministic fluctuations in equilibrium models involve predictable changes in relative prices which should be ruled out by intertemporal arbitrage. In models of overlapping generations, however, finite lives can restrict complete arbitrage over time. As a result, some people thought, and still think, that cycles that are shorter than the agents' postulated lifespans would not be possible in equilibrium models, and therefore are irrelevant for business-cycle analysis. This view is clearly wrong, and of course ignores the extensive literature on cycles and chaos in optimal growth models with infinitely lived agents. In such models deterministic cycles in relative prices occur easily, but the amplitudes of the cycles remain within bounds of the discount rate. 3 It is not difficult to show in the context of multisector growth models, say with Cobb-Douglas production functions, that for any positive discount rate there is a large class of technologies for which cycles occur. (See Benhabib and Rustichini [1990].) Getting chaos, however, is harder. Recent works by Sorger (1992), by Mitra (1995), and by Nishimura and Yano (1995) give lower bounds for the discount rate, below which chaos is ruled out for one-sector models of optimal growth. Yet even in that context, going to a multisector framework may considerably lower the bounds on the discount rate thus far established. A second reason for the attention that chaotic dynamics received in the economics literature regards prediction. The common wisdom has been that economic fluctuations are driven by exogenous shocks. Chaotic dynamics not only supplied an alternative explanation for at least some part of economic fluctuations, but also provided an excuse for economists' difficulties with forecasting. Sometimes, however, an important feature of chaotic dynamics that makes forecasting difficult, namely, sensitive dependence on initial conditions, is used in a cavalier way to explain short-run dynamics, forgetting that the effect of sensitive dependence becomes significant only after some periods, but not in the very short run. When it became obvious that very-standard equilibrium models could easily generate cycles and chaos, the attention in the literature naturally turned to the empirical plausibility of such dynamics. The most interesting approach, inspired by developments in natural sciences and mathematics, was also atheoretical, and reminiscent of VAR methods of time series. 4 The idea was to try to infer whether a particular economic time series was generated by a deterministic, low (at most four-or five-) dimensional system that was chaotic, or whether it came from a simple (linear) stochastic system. It is not difficult to see that such inferences are hard to make when the time-series data is short, as is the case with most economic series, with the exception of financial data. It is not surprising, then, that many applications of this approach are in the area of finance, but even there, where we have very high-frequency data, it is hard to pick up fluctuations that may occur at lower
Journal of Economic Surveys, 2011
The great crash of 2008 and the associated banking crisis have exposed the increasing irrelevance of much mainstream economics and provoked some economists to re-examine their discipline. Linear or linearised models with well-behaved additive stochastic disturbances, based on "microeconomic foundations" are no longer anywhere near adequate.
We discuss some issues and challenges facing economic modellers when confronted with data generated within a non-linear world. The pitfalls associated with the linearization of inherently non-linear models are raised and the concept of robustness defined and proposed as a property of scientifically valid models. The existence of chaos in economic time series is discussed and an example, using financial data, presented.
Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 30, 2014
The global financial crisis proved the critical impact of the gap between individual rationality and group rationality. This gap is not supposed to arise in a Neoclassical world, but it frequently arises in a world as complex as ours. The paper explores how endogenous instability might arise due to such a gap, and what behavioral rules might help to mitigate its impact.
2018
In Part I, we discussed the significance of nonlinear economic dynamics and investigated two simple models that exhibit chaotic behavior. Nonlinear economic dynamics originated in the 1930s, led into chaotic economic dynamics at the end of the 1970s, and continues today. However, research on nonlinear economic dynamics has thus far suffered from the serious restriction on mathematical analytics. We discuss this restriction in Sect. 4.1. In Sect. 4.2, we consider where nonlinear economic dynamics should be headed and state that it should aim to use computationally oriented research methods against the background of complex system theory. This statement underpins the studies presented in Chaps. 5, 6, and 7. Furthermore, Sect. 4.3 points out that two fundamental directions exist in which research on economic complexity has been carried out: the econophysics approach and agent-based model approach. We concentrate on the latter approach in Chaps. 6 and 7. This short chapter also serves a...
2013
Catastrophe theory and deterministic chaos constitute basic elements of the science of complexity. Elementary catastrophes were the first form of nonlinear, topological complexity that were seriously studied in economics. Deterministic chaos and other types of complexity succeeded catastrophe theory. In general, chaos means the seemingly random behavior of a deterministic system, which stems from high sensitivity to its initial conditions. Nonlinear dynamical systems theory, which unites various manifestations of complexity into one integrated system, is contrary to the assumptions that markets and economies spontaneously strive for a state of equilibrium. To the contrary, their complexity seems to grow due to the influence of classic economic laws. In my paper, I indicate that with time, model economic systems strive for a state we call "the edge of chaos". I consider two cases. The first case concerns an economy based on a two-stage accelerator, where the economic cycle ...
Environmental Modelling & Software, 2007
We discuss some issues and challenges facing economic modellers when confronted with data generated within a non-linear world. The pitfalls associated with the linearization of inherently non-linear models are raised and the concept of robustness defined and proposed as a property of scientifically valid models. The existence of chaos in economic time series is discussed and an example, using financial data, presented.
International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 2016
This article analyses the basic sources and types of economic complexity: chaotic attractors and repellers, complexity catastrophes, coexistence of attractors, sensitive dependence on parameters, final state sensitivity, effects of fractal basin boundaries and chaotic saddles. Four nonlinear classic models have been used for this purpose: virtual duopoly model, model of a centrally planned economy, cobweb model with adaptive expectations and the business cycle model. The issue of economic complexity has not been sufficiently dealt with in the literature. Studies of complexity in economics usually focus on identifying the conditions under which deterministic chaos emerges in models as the main form of complexity, while analyses of other forms of complexity are much less frequent. The article has two objectives: methodological and explicative, which are to shed some new light on the issue. The first objective is to make as comprehensive a catalogue of sources of economic complexity as...
Acta Physica Polonica A, 2013
The catastrophe theory and deterministic chaos constitute the basic elements of economic complexity. Elementary catastrophes were the rst remarkable form of nonlinear, topological complexity that were thoroughly studied in economics. Another type of catastrophe is the complexity catastrophe, namely an increase in the complexity of a system beyond a certain threshold which marks the beginning of a decrease in a system's adaptive capacity. As far as the ability to survive is concerned, complex adaptive systems should function within the range of optimal complexity which is neither too low or too high. Deterministic chaos and other types of complexity follow from the catastrophe theory. In general, chaos is seemingly random behavior of a deterministic system which stems from its high sensitivity to the initial condition. The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems, which unites various manifestations of complexity into one integrated system, runs contrary to the assumption that markets and economies spontaneously strive for a state of equilibrium. The opposite applies: their complexity seems to grow due to the inuence of classical economic laws.
Economica, 1993
This paper is the outcome o f a series o f lectures given during several visits to the European University Institute.
Computational Economics, 2004
Existence theory in economics is usually in real domains such as the findingsof chaotic trajectories in models of economic growth, tâtonnement, oroverlapping generations models. Computational examples, however, sometimesconverge rapidly to cyclic orbits when in theory they should be nonperiodicalmost surely. We explain this anomaly as the result of digital approximationand conclude that both theoretical and numerical behavior can still illuminateessential features of the real data.
2012
Complexity is one of the most important characteristic properties of the economic behaviour. The new field of knowledge called Chaotic Dynamic Economics born precisely with the objective of understanding, structuring and explaining in an endogenous way such complexity. In this paper, and after scanning the principal concepts and techniques of the chaos theory, we analyze, principally, the different areas of Economic Science from the point of view of complexity and chaos, the main and most recent researches, and the present situation about the results and possibilities of achieving an useful application of those techniques and concepts in our field.
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2017
NED is a biennial international meeting of scholars interested in economic dynamics, with the intention to bring together different streams of the growing literature in this field and to stimulate a fruitful exchange between theoretical research and applications in economics. The theory of dynamical systems is among the areas of mathematics that have witnessed the largest advancements in the last 60 years, with a wide spectrum of applications ranging from physics to biology to economics and social science. Moreover, during the last decades economic theory has started to experience an important shift in methodology. The classical approach that views economic outcomes as equilibrium phenomena, resulting from the choices of fully rational and identical economic agents, has failed to explain many important features of economic complexity in the real world, and has been criticized for its inability to predict sudden changes, such as economic crises and financial turmoils. As a consequence, a growing interest in alternative approaches has emerged, emphasizing the role of bounded rationality, agents' heterogeneity, social interaction, learning and adaptive adjustment processes. Following this new paradigm, firms, organizations, markets and economies are viewed as complex evolving systems characterized
Handbook of Research on Complexity
This paper examines the rising competition between computational and dynamic conceptualizations of complexity in economics. While computable economics views the complexity as something rigorously defined based on concepts from probability, information, and computability criteria, dynamic complexity is based on whether a system endogenously and deterministically generates erratically dynamic behavior of certain kinds. On such behavior is the phenomenon of emergence, the appearance of new forms or structures at higher levels of a system from processes occurring at lower levels. While the two concepts can overlap, they represent substantially different perspectives. A competition of sorts between them may become more important as new, computerized market systems emerge and evolve to higher levels of complexity of both kinds.
Stochastics and Dynamics, 2001
This paper surveys recent advances in the application of random dynamical systems theory in economics. It illustrates the usefulness of this framework for modeling and analysis of economic phenomena with stochastic components, mainly focusing on stochastic dynamic models of economic growth. The paper also highlights some directions for further applications and interdisciplinary research on random dynamical systems.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.