Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
4 pages
1 file
The review of "The Novel: A Biography" critiques Schmidt's exploration of the English literary canon and its authors, highlighting both the engaging prose and the conventionality of the narratives presented, particularly within the context of familiar figures in the genre. While the book introduces inventive pairings of texts, its focus largely remains on an English-language tradition, neglecting significant literary contributions from various other cultures, which restricts the broader understanding of the novel's evolution.
Journal of Modern Literature, 2006
Literary Studies, 2016
J.M Coetzee’s Disgrace is a portrayal of characters in a social context of South Africa where the writer himself was brought up. It throws light on the new social milieu of post apartheid society where Lucy, a white is raped by a black African. She seems to accept this heinous deed with an ease by giving it a historical blend. She understands her rape as a black’s way of taking revenge for what whites have treated the blacks in the past. She considers it different from the universal concept of rape as a forceful sex. By making the blacks raping the white woman, Coetzee seems to be rewriting the African history and in this he dismantles the black/white dichotomy. So, I contend to carry out that Disgrace being a highly paradoxical and contradictory novel presents a world dying without hope and fear. It exposes the intellectual insecurity in South Africa which proves to be a threat to white man’s stability and culture.
In 1999 I wrote a review of Coetzee's novel "Disgrace" for the "Mail & Guardian" paper in South Africa. In the past year I have taught seminars on the work at the University of Leeds and at Berkeley, and have been prompted to some new considerations. I don't wish to write a full paper on the work, because I feel the review articulated much of my thinking about the novel. Nonetheless, I would wish to point out that the review was edited in publication, and is at points rather compressed. I no longer have access to that piece as originally written, and so choose to leave it as it was when published, in 1999. What is attached here are some additional notes on my recent thinking, along with the original review.
Cambridge University Press
The Scriblerian and the Kit-Cats, 2010
2010
This essay discusses two of Coetzee’s best-known works in academic circles: both appear widely on university syllabi and offer students a chance to engage with debates on authorship, intertextuality, and canonicity. Beginning with a discussion of the reception histories of these two novels, the essay charts the ways in which Coetzee’s fiction is consumed locally and globally and ask questions not only about the politics of writing, but also the ethics of reading (see Attwell 1993; Huggan 2001; Attridge 2005; and Easton in Morrison & Watkins (eds), 2006). When Foe was published in 1986 at the height of State of Emergency South Africa, for example, it caused a stir for its apparent remoteness from the South African situation (as the reviewer Harriett Gilbert asked: 'Postmodern narratives while Soweto burns?'). When Disgrace appeared in 1999, it caused great consternation for its ‘bleak’ representation of the ‘new’ South Africa – not just in reviews, but also in Government quar...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Ariel a Review of International English Literature, 2006
Studies in American Fiction, 2022
Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 2021
James Joyce Quarterly, 2016
Mediatropes, 2015
Studies in the Novel 48.2 , 2016
Research in African Literatures, 2003
Journal of the Short Story in English Les Cahiers De La Nouvelle, 2007
Borrowed Forms, 2014
Ariel a Review of International English Literature, 2011