Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1999
ABSTRACT Co-opetition, simultaneous co-operation and competition, is a recent phenomenon. Coopetition entails sharing knowledge that may be a key source of competitive advantage, but the knowledge gained by co-operation may also be used for competition. There is little investiga-
ACM Sigmis Database, 1999
Recent business trends have given rise to co-opetition: simultaneous co-operation and competition between firms. Co-opetition entails the sharing of knowledge which may be a key source of competitive advantage. Under co-opetition there is a paradox that the knowledge shared for cooperation may also be used for competition. While the existence of this problem is known, there is little investigation of how it may be modeled and, thus, managed. This paper begins by discussing the problem situation and its underlying theory. It then introduces a game-theoretic framework for analyzing interorganizational knowledge sharfng in the context of co-opetition. This allows the value of knowledge shared to be investigated and reveals that a crucial aspect will be the firm's ability to manage the process. Thus, based on the framework, the paper explores management guidefines predicated on co-ordination and control theory for the most challenging of four contingencies identified. The paper concludes with an agenda for future theoretical and empirical research. ACM Categories: H1.1, K6.0
Recent work on SMEs and networks has emphasised the importance of external co-operative ties in enhancing firms' innovative performance. These external ties provide resource constrained SMEs with access to a wider set of technological opportunities through information sharing and resource pooling. Previous studies of the SME innovation-cooperation relationship have used categorical measures to capture tie existence which, while providing some useful insights, largely fail to capture the strength of co-operative relationships and/or the variety of relational directions in which co-operation occurs. This study aims to address this measurement deficiency and explore the SME innovation-cooperation relationship by designing and utilising measures that capture both the multi-scalar (strength) and multi-dimensional (variety) nature of co-operation and innovation. We then apply these measures to a survey of UK manufacturing SMEs. Data is obtained for 371 SMEs, and we then assess the innovationco-operation relationship within a multivariate regression framework. We find that the strength of cooperative ties across a range of productive activities within the value chain are important facilitators for SME innovative capability; this is true for both product and process innovation. However, we find that SME co-operation with rivals (co-opetition) has no significant impact upon innovation. Our results have significant implications for both supply chain managers and policy-makers interested in enhancing innovation among SMEs. In particular, we argue that SME innovative activity benefits from good, close dyadic relations within the supply chain, while more generally policy should be geared towards nurturing and sustaining SME innovation networks.
Proceedings of Third European …, 2002
This paper aims to develop a framework for SMEs to help them understand, and thus to improve, the process of knowledge exchange with their customers or suppliers. Through a review of the literature on knowledge transfer, organisational learning, social network theory and electronic networks, the key actors, key factors and their relationships in the process are identified. Finally, a framework containing all above points is proposed.
International Business …, 2011
In order to improve SMES' competitiveness, introduction of Knowledge into all aspects of production process and management levels is essential. The question is how the knowledge can be transfer into firms? The purpose of this study is to examine the role of knowledge transfer in Firm's competitiveness. Firms' need to manage resources flow effectively to be able to survive and to grow in competitive business environment. How can they do this? Over the last decade, the knowledge-based view has rapidly seized a prominent role in strategy research. The knowledge-based view explains that tacit knowledge is the critical component of the value that a firm adds to input , and that a firm's ability to transfer this tacit knowledge is the essential source of sustained competitive advantage. Firms which have a good absorptive capacity and combinative capabilities are able to compete effectively. Absorptive capacity and combinative capability are main aspect of knowledge-transfer which has captured the attention of numerous studies in recent years. Large firms have possibilities to invest a large amount of money into R&D and to monopolize the knowledge which they have explored and then to exploit it, but the questions are: What about SMES? Are they able to explore and to exploit new knowledge? What are the advantages of K-T in SMES' competitiveness? With consideration of SMES' expansion in developed and developing countries, growth and survival of them depend on K-T in these firms and its relationship with firms' competitiveness. When firms interact with external constituents, be they suppliers or customers, they seek to acquire and/or maintain access to knowledge that otherwise would not efficiently available. Based on the literature review a theoretical model of
By means of a questionnaire conducted on a cross-sectional segment of strategic cooperative ventures in Turkey, this paper examines the factors affecting knowledge transfer between alliance partners. Conceptually, tacit knowledge transfer occurs in an environment characterized by ambiguity which in turn, has knowledge tacitness, asset specificity and complexity, prior experience, partner protectiveness, and cultural and organizational distance as antecedent variables. Regression analyses are conducted in order to determine which factors are influential on knowledge transfer processes. Research results are analyzed from a viewpoint of consistency with academic literature in the field of strategic management. The findings of the study highlight means and strategies to be pursued by Turkish companies aiming at effective knowledge acquisition through strategic cooperation in order to improve organizational learning capabilities and gain competitive strength.
European Management Journal, 2004
Knowledge-based activities are at the basis of sustainable competitive advantage in today's economy. Resource-and knowledge-based theorists claim that firms should focus on the creation and accumulation of knowledge-based competencies in order to yield long-term survival. For SMEs, this can be a difficult task as their characteristics often hamper the leverage of the required competencies. This paper focuses on the role strategic alliances can fulfil within the knowledge acquisition and learning processes of SMEs. The empirical findings indicate that only a limited number of SMEs is involved in strategic 'knowledge-sharing' alliances. Several entrepreneurs do not cooperate because they fear transferring their know-how and losing their competitive advantage. However, SMEs involvement in strategic alliances resulted in improved firm performance.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 2006
Purpose -External knowledge is generally believed to be of prime importance to small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). However, a review of the literature shows that no empirical research has looked at knowledge management issues at the inter-organizational level in SMEs. This paper seeks to report on an empirical investigation with UK SMEs in the service sector to identify their needs and practices regarding inter-organizational knowledge transfer, and thus provide empirical evidence to support the above belief.
International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 2008
The study focused on an issue of knowledge transfer across Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). The overall goal was to identify current practices for knowledge transfer (i.e. both tacit and explicit) between two SMEs (as manufacturers/buyers and suppliers/providers. This study responded to the concern on outsourcing and supplier development for sustainable SMEs competitiveness. This study represented an initial phase of the research on the term external knowledge. This study involved ten SMEs considered to be of high performance. The results also incorporated the opinions of invited practitioners on the level of practicality of identified practices. There were many knowledge-transfer practices found to be useful for explicit knowledge such as formal meetings, site visits/audits and assignment of contact persons. For tacit knowledge, they included story telling, social interactions and employment of former staffs. The study's limitations were recognised. Finally, future studies were suggested.
Inter-organisational knowledge transfer is very important for SMEs. However, compared to knowledge transfer within an organisation, its 'boundary paradox' makes its process more complicated and difficult to understand. In order to solve the 'paradox', inter-organisational knowledge transfer strategies need to be developed for SMEs. Through a review of the literature on knowledge transfer, this paper proposes an inter-organisational knowledge transfer process model that contains four stages (initiation, selection, interaction and conversion). It classifies three situations in which an SME exchanges knowledge with a customer (whether a larger company or an SME). It then applies a coordinating mechanism to analyse knowledge transfer strategies for the SME when it is a knowledgegiving firm and knowledge-receiving firm respectively, in the different stages of each situation.
Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2003
This paper focuses on a theoretical modelling of multilateral SME co-operation. A major part of the previous research has been done on dyadic or bilateral relationships between two partners in a vertical chain although new co-operative ventures increasingly involve multiple partners. The objectives of the paper are to accomplish a conceptualization of different types of multilateral co-operation between SMEs as a synthesis of longitudinal empirical observations and selected theoretical discussions of inter-firm co-operation, to bring out possible advantages and prerequisites of successful co-operation of these types, and to show how co-operation can develop from one basic model to another. The main point in the modelling of SME co-operation is that those who plan, promote or build up co-operative arrangements must know right from the beginning what kind of co-operative model a group of firms will strive for, because the prerequisites of successful co-operation are emphasized differently in different types of co-operation. The empirical examples also suggest that co-operation leads to co-operation, i.e. when a company once joins a net, it is more probable that the company gets access to other nets as well. The basic challenge thus is to get the small or medium-sized company to enter its first co-operative arrangement.
International Journal of Innovation Management, 2018
For small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), innovation co-operation represents a promising avenue to get around limitations and increase their innovation capacity. But under which conditions are firms more susceptible to engage in such ventures? The purpose of this research paper is to further our understanding of the factors contributing to innovation co-operation for manufacturing SMEs from the firm’s perspective. Following an online and telephone survey with SME managers ([Formula: see text]), we studied the presence or absence of innovation co-operation. We subsequently investigated the intensity of innovation co-operation with market partners (clients, competitors, consultants, and suppliers) and research partners (laboratories, post-secondary education institutions, technology transfer centers, and universities), addressing gaps in a literature dominated by binary analysis. Our empirical analyses suggest that innovation co-operation is promoted by several key determinants. ...
2009
The main aim of this paper is to suggest how collaboration with competitors-coopetition-established for the joint creation of knowledge, could be a new opportunity that managers must evaluate as a strategic option. The literature on strategic alliances and knowledge creation is considered, together with the specific trend of alliances with competitors. Then, the process continues with the discussion of circumstances and characteristics in which coopetition could be a superior option, making it possible to develop new knowledge.
Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 2011
This paper focuses on the how the Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) scheme has been used to introduce new information systems and advance learning and development at Optimum Consultancy Ltd, which was formed on 1st July 2008 via the amalgamation of Hama Ltd and J Orchard Consulting Limited. This new company now has 35 staff and turnover grew from £2.4m in 2008-9 to £3.1m in 2009-10. The knowledge base partner is the University of Gloucestershire, based in Cheltenham, UK. The KTP product is arguably the most used channel for effecting knowledge transfer between universities and local industries in the UK. The impact of the project is reviewed in terms of improved efficiencies, professional development, skills enhancement and organisational change. Learning and development were embodied in this major project to implement an integrated IT solution for the new company and rationalise and standardise the core business processes in the three offices situated at different locations in UK.
Cooperation between competing organizations (co-opetition) to achieve common objectives has become a prerequisite for global competitiveness and innovativeness. Co-opetition is a business strategy which emphasizes both cooperative and competitive relations between two or more organizations. It implies that firms, especially Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), perform better when they are involved in competitive and cooperative relationships at the same time and combine their complementary strengths to create synergies. The present study discusses the various definitions and types of co-opetition strategy and addresses the implications of economic crisis on SMEs. Finally, the paper suggests that co-opetition could be an appropriate business strategy for SMEs in difficult economic conditions provided that they develop a co-opetitive portfolio with different kinds of partners by seeking to obtain the advantages of each partnership and become more competitive.
International Journal of Business and Management, 2009
Knowledge transfer has been acknowledged as the conveyance of knowledge between actors in an exchange relationship. Inter-firm knowledge transfer considerations are particularly applicable to the viability of cooperative alliances. This paper attempts to identify and demonstrate the limitations and gaps in the existing theoretical approaches when it comes to understanding the phenomena of inter-organizational knowledge transfer relying on alliances in the competitive and changing environment.
GEOUSP: Espaço e Tempo (Online), 2001
Geography and the history of economics teach us firstly that econom ic progress, growth and development involve multiple prime causes, entrepreneurial m anagem ent styles, territorial production and distribution organisation and secondly that such processes occur in different ways since the Earth is an environmental space, physically and socially differentiated by the his tory of nature and peoples.
KCA Journal of Business Management, 2011
The level of success enjoyed by an organisation is dependent on its competitive advantage over the competitors. A firm's competitive advantage is positively correlated to its level of knowledge on existing market conditions, and ability to adapt and exploit the prevailing market conditions. However, discourse in existing literature on ways through which small and medium enterprises (SMEs), often constrained by lack of resources, can acquire requisite knowledge needed to build competitive advantage and for continued existence are minimal. This paper discusses how SMEs could enhance their skills and competitiveness by leveraging on the resources and knowledge inherent in networks and partnership arrangements. Specifically, it explains how these arrangements could be utilized to develop knowledge resources and capabilities. This work is theoretical in nature and relies heavily on the review of pertinent existing literature on knowledge acquisition, competitive advantage, networks, partnerships, and performance. Organisations, especially SMEs, the paper argues, can acquire and develop knowledge resources and capabilities via networks and partnerships. The acquired knowledge and capabilities can then be leveraged to create competitive advantage for the enterprises.
Journal of Small Business Management, 2009
Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) face tremendous challenges in their attempt to pursue technological innovations. This paper argues that co-opetition strategy—simultaneous pursuit of competition and collaboration—helps SMEs to develop their ability to effectively pursue technological innovations. We developed a multilevel conceptual model consisting of factors at the industry, dyadic, and firm level to understand the drivers of co-opetition and discuss benefits and costs of co-opetition for SMEs. We believe that this paper will stimulate future conceptual and empirical research on this important topic and has implications for SME managers and policymakers.
Journal of Business Research, 2013
This study researches an important topic for knowledge-intensive SMEs that operate in clusters. Results from a sample of 830 SMEs as well as from qualitative validation interviews indicate that coopetition, the simultaneous pursuit of cooperation and competition, has a varying impact on innovations of SMEs. Three moderators influence coopetition's innovation performance: (1) sharing knowledge with the partner, (2) learning from the partner (inlearning), and (3) technological uncertainty. Overall, the study finds that coopetition can trigger radical innovation, but at the same time can harm the extremely novel revolutionary innovation. The damaging effect on revolutionary innovation is even stronger when SMEs share knowledge with their partners. However, a positive effect of coopetition on revolutionary innovation is achievable if SMEs do integrate their partners' knowledge through inlearning. Coopetition is also advantageous under greater technological uncertainty. A latent profile analysis in this study disentangles unobserved heterogeneity and displays seven different profiles of SMEs.
2006
This paper reports on the value of collaboration in helping SMEs identify more clearly their positions in their markets and to provide pointers to strategies that might lead to increased profitability.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.