Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2003, Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology
…
7 pages
1 file
Decompensated heart failure is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality and it is responsible for numerous hospitalizations. The current approach to acute exacerbations is based on diuretics, vasodilators and inotropes. Compared with the impressive development of new therapeutic agents designed for other cardiovascular diseases, little progress has been observed in developing new drugs for the treatment of decompensated heart failure. Moreover, a series of controlled clinical trials failed to show a better outcome or a reduction in morbidity during treatment with inotropes, even though promising results were recently observed in controlled clinical trials with new classes of drugs, such as calcium sensitizers and nesiritide; these agents will probably modify the treatment options of decompensated heart failure in the coming years.
International Journal of Cardiology, 2019
Inotropes aim at increasing cardiac output by enhancing cardiac contractility. They constitute the third pharmacological pillar in the treatment of patients with decompensated heart failure, the other two being diuretics and vasodilators. Three classes of parenterally administered inotropes are currently indicated for decompensated heart failure, (i) the beta adrenergic agonists, including dopamine and dobutamine and also the catecholamines epinephrine and norepinephrine, (ii) the phosphodiesterase III inhibitor milrinone and (iii) the calcium sensitizer levosimendan. These three families of drugs share some pharmacologic traits, but differ profoundly in many of their pleiotropic effects. Identifying the patients in need of inotropic support and selecting the proper inotrope in each case remain challenging. The present consensus, derived by a panel meeting of experts from 21 countries, aims at addressing this very issue in the setting of both acute and advanced heart failure.
Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology, 2014
Acute heart failure (AHF) represents a major burden in developed countries. However, pharmacological approaches have remained almost the same for 30 years and are still based on consensus rather than evidence, given that no medical therapy has been shown to positively affect clinical outcomes. Current pharmacological approaches are still based on decongestion by using diuretics in almost all patients, plus either vasodilators or inotropic agents to improve hemodynamics according to perfusion status. The role of loop diuretics (furosemide) and nitrates (nitroglycerin and nitroprusside) is well established, but new agents such as vasopressin and adenosine antagonists, as well as nesiritide, have failed to show any additional value. In the presence of hypoperfusion, the use of inotropics must be considered despite the lack of benefit in terms of survival, and the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors and levosimendan has not shown any significant advantages over catecholamines (dobutamine). AHF involves a wide spectrum of patients and syndromes, and this probably accounts for the failure of trials set up to evaluate new therapeutic approaches for improving outcomes: therapies need to be tailored to specific patients. At this time, serelaxin represents a promising new agent which has a multifaceted effect, including organ protection, and has shown encouraging results when tailored for a well defined population. In addition, the role of ularitide, a synthetic form of the natriuretic peptide urodilatin, and the new cardiac myosin activators, as a new class of inotropic agents, will be established in the near future by ongoing trials. Therefore, AHF continues to be an unsolved problem and, in light of the lessons learned, new pharmacological approaches should be tailored to well defined AHF populations, incorporating concepts such as "the sooner the better", "improve and stabilize", and "prevent organ damage", in order to be able to improve clinical outcomes, including both mortality and readmission rates.
Heart Failure Reviews, 2009
Treatment with inotropic agents is one of the most controversial topics in heart failure. Initial enthusiasm, based on strong pathophysiological rationale and apparent empirical efficacy, has been progressively limited by results of controlled trials and registries showing poorer outcomes of the patients on inotropic therapy. The use of these agents remains, however, potentially indicated in a significant proportion of patients with low cardiac output, peripheral hypoperfusion and end-organ dysfunction caused by heart failure. Limitations of inotropic therapy seem to be mainly related to their mechanisms of action entailing arrhythmogenesis, peripheral vasodilation, myocardial ischemia and damage, and possibly due to their use in patients without a clear indication, rather than to the general principle of inotropic therapy itself. This review will discuss the characteristics of the patients with a potential indication for inotropic therapy, the main data from registries and controlled trials, the mechanism of the untoward effects of these agents on outcomes and, lastly, perspectives with new agents with novel mechanisms of action.
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 2016
Background: Data about the use of positive inotropic agents in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is limited. Methods: The records of 8066 patients with ADHF who were hospitalized at Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar from 1991 to 2013 were analyzed to explore demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients according to inotropic agents use. Results: Eight hundred fifty eight patients [10.6 %, 95 % CI (10 to 11.3 %)] received intravenous inotropic support. Patients receiving inotropes were more likely to be female and have preserved ejection fraction when compared to those not receiving inotropic agents. Comorbidities associated with higher likelihood of receiving inotropic treatment included acute myocardial infarction, chronic renal impairment, dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity and hyperglycemia. Patient on inotropes were more likely to undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), intra-aortic balloon pump support and intubation. There were no differences in the mean plasma BNP and CK-MB levels between the 2 groups. Heart failure patients receiving inotropes also were more likely to have complications including ventricular tachycardia (2.0 % vs. 0.9 %, p = 0.003), prolonged hospital stay (8.0 vs. 5.0 days, p = 0.001), cardiac arrest (14.6 % vs. 3.2 %, p = 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (30.8 % vs. 9.1 %, p = 0.001). Over the study period there was an increase use of inotropic agents and decreased mortality rates. Conclusion: Inotropic use increased over the period whereas; female gender and conventional cardiac risk factors were predictors of inotropic agents use in the study.
American Heart Journal, 2007
Background Treatment of decompensated heart failure often includes the use of intravenous vasoactive medications, but the effect on outcome has not been clearly defined.
ACC Current Journal Review, 1999
Cardiovascular & Hematological Disorders-Drug Targets, 2009
Acute heart failure (AHF) represents a major public health problem due to its high prevalence, high rates of mortality and readmissions and significant healthcare costs. Patients with AHF and low cardiac output represent a small subgroup of patients with very high mortality rates that require inotropic support to improve cardiac systolic function. Classical inotropic agents, such as 1-adrenergic agonists (dobutamine, dopamine) and phosphodiesterase III inhibitors (milrinone, enoximone) improve symptoms and hemodynamics by increasing free intracellular Ca 2+ levels, but also increase myocardial O 2 demands and exert arrhythmogenic effects. These actions explain why these drugs increase both short-and long-term mortality, particularly in patients with AHF and coronary artery disease. Thus, we need new inotropic agents that do not increase cytosolic Ca 2+ or myocardial oxygen demands or produce arrhythmogenesis for the treatment of high-risk patients with (AHF) and low cardiac output. This review describes three new classes of investigational agents: levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer and potassium channel opener, istaroxime, the first new luso-inotropic agent and cardiac myosin activators.
Heart Research - Open Journal, 2017
International Journal of Cardiology, 2005
The clinician's primary objective in treating a patient with decompensated heart failure is rapid and effective stabilization. This goal often is achieved through the use of inotropic support. Classic inotropic agents (beta-adrenergic agonists and phosphodiesterase III inhibitors) can provide short-term hemodynamic benefits, but their long-term use has been correlated with poor survival rates. Calcium sensitizers comprise a new drug class that offers hemodynamic and symptomatic improvements without increasing cAMP and intracellular calcium concentrations. These agents enhance contractility without a concurrent increase in the risk of cardiac events and thus represent a significant improvement over classic positive inotropic agents. Levosimendan is the most potent calcium sensitizer to date, exhibiting a unique dual mechanism of action that combines a positive inotropic action mediated via calcium sensitization and a vasodilator property via ATP-dependent potassium channels. Available clinical data suggest that calcium sensitizer agents represent a promising class of inotropic agents in a field that has seen few advances in recent decades.
Amer J Cardiol, 2005
Association functional class IV, who were resistant to 24-hour continuous dobutamine infusion, were treated with continuous infusions of dobutamine 10 g/kg/min for >48 hours (group I, n ؍ 18), followed by weekly intermittent 8-hour infusions or more often if needed. In group II (n ؍ 18), after the initial 24-hour infusion of dobutamine, a 24-hour levosimendan infusion was added followed by biweekly 24-hour infusions. The addition of intermittent levosimendan infusions prolonged the survival of patients with advanced heart failure refractory to intermittent dobutamine infusions (45-day survival rates were 6% and 61% in groups I and II, respectively; p ؍ 0.0002, log-rank test). ᮊ2005 by Excerpta Medica Inc. (Am J Cardiol 2005;95:768 -771) 768 . Cardiac troponin C as a target protein for a novel calcium sensitizing drug, levosimendan. Alpert NR, Just H. Effects of calcium sensitizers on intracellular calcium handling and myocardial energetics. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995;26(suppl 1):S45-S51. 3. Follath F, Cleland JG, Just H, Papp JG, Scholz H, Peuhkurinen K, Harjola VP, Mitrovic V, Abdalla M, Sandell EP, Lehtonen L, and the Steering Committee and Investigators of the Levosimendan Infusion versus Dobutamine (LIDO) Study. Efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (the LIDO study): a randomized double-blind trial.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
International Journal of Cardiology, 2012
Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2023
Congestive Heart Failure, 2004
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1998
The American Journal of Medicine, 2007
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), 2015
The Keio Journal of Medicine, 1987
Cardiology in review
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research
Clinical Cardiology, 1994
Journal of Cardiac Failure, 2013
Pharmacotherapy, 2009
The American Journal of Medicine, 2006
Journal of Clinical Medicine