Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2013 was marked with several noteworthy events with particular relevance to international humanitarian law, such as the continuation of the conflict in Syria and the incidents related to the use of chemical weapons in that conflict; several key decisions in international, hybrid and national courts related to the adjudication of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide; the passage of an Arms Trade Treaty text; the 150 th anniversary of the International Committee of the Red Cross; and the release of the second part of the Turkel Commission Report. This chapter addresses a number of these issues among other events of note.
Facts and Norms Newsletter, 2024
ISSN 2965-8780 Editorial Welcome to the ninth edition of the Facts and Norms Newsletter for 2024. In this issue, we continue our commitment to providing comprehensive coverage of significant judgments and developments from international and regional courts, along with updates on pressing global issues. The International Court of Justice has received fifteen written statements concerning the question of the right to strike under ILO Convention No. 87, reflecting the global significance of labor rights. Additionally, Chile has filed a declaration of intervention in the Gaza case (South Africa v. Israel). This edition also covers the potential dire consequences for Yemen following recent strikes, the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza exacerbated by inclement weather and ongoing conflict, the condemnation of attacks on a hospital in Ukraine, among other concerning news. The UN's call for more action to combat senseless criminality in Haiti, where rampant gang violence has resulted in thousands of deaths this year, is also featured. Additionally, we delve into the growing crisis in Afghanistan amidst declining international funding and restrictive measures imposed by the de facto authorities. Turning to regional tribunals, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights concluded its 169th Regular Session, delivering judgments in several significant cases involving forced disappearances, extrajudicial executions, and the rights of indigenous peoples, among other subjects. Within the African Human Rights System, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights conducted hearings conducted a public hearing in a case concerning the rights of persons with albinism in Tanzania. The Court also delivered judgments on cases concerning the right to a fair trial, and issues of inadmissibility due to non-exhaustion of local remedies. This edition also features summaries of recent judgments by the European Court of Human Rights on a variety of topics. These include the prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens, the right to private life concerning expulsion on national security grounds, respect for patients' autonomy in medical decisions, property rights, family life and deportation, and the rights of journalists and opposition candidates. As always, our Academic & Professional Opportunities section provides a comprehensive overview of calls for papers, fellowships, job openings, and other opportunities in international law and human rights. We encourage our readers to explore these third-party opportunities and to independently verify the details provided. We further encourage our readers to learn more about the Facts and Norms Institute's second Winter Course on Legal Theory, International Law, and Human Rights. This exclusive educational opportunity for Portuguese speakers will take place in the vibrant city of Lisbon, Portugal, offering participants a chance to engage with renowned professors, explore critical legal issues, and experience the rich academic environment of the University of Lisbon! Details about the course can be found in the "News from the Institute" section below. We invite you to delve into this edition, engage with the diverse perspectives presented, and join us in our ongoing commitment to advancing knowledge, promoting justice, and upholding the principles of international law and human dignity. Enjoy the read! Professor Henrique Napoleão Alves, Chief Editor
Facts and Norms Newsletter #14, 2025
EDITORIAL: This new edition of the Facts and Norms Newsletter appears at a time of global instability and mounting threats to human dignity. While a ceasefire in Gaza offers a glimmer of hope, the UN Secretary-General's urgent warning against ethnic cleansing in the enclave — alongside rising violence in the occupied West Bank — casts a shadow over any optimism. Elsewhere, the armed conflict in DR Congo intensified; Haiti continues suffering from relentless gang violence; in Syria, systematic pillaging undermines rebuilding efforts. We also report on the International Court of Justice, grappling with complex cases, including the Gaza advisory proceedings and counter-claims in the case concerning Ukraine. The International Criminal Court, in turn, faces direct political pressure, as exemplified by a US Executive Order threatening sanctions, a move condemned by the Court itself. On the regional front, the European Court of Human Rights continues to deliver new judgments, holding states accountable for violations ranging from freedom of expression to the right to life, including significant rulings on Russia's suppression of dissent and Italy's failure to protect citizens from toxic pollution. The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights emphasizes the importance of reparations in advancing justice. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, through its judgments and provisional measures, further expands its caselaw on the prohibition of torture, labor rights, and other important human rights topics. As always, our Academic and Professional Opportunities’ section offers numerous opportunities for career development. We encourage readers to review these third-party opportunities with due diligence and seize any that match their aspirations. We conclude this issue by highlighting key contributions from the Facts and Norms Institute. The Institute's amicus brief was cited in the Inter-American Court's condemnation of Brazil for the Acari Massacre. Our research on violence against women and children in sports informed a groundbreaking United Nations report. In addition, the Institute’s partnership with the American Society of International Law yielded a new edition of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’ Newsletter. As you read through these pages, we hope you not only gain insight into the critical issues of our time but also find renewed motivation to champion the values of dignity, justice, and human rights.
Facts and Norms Newsletter, 2025
EDITORIAL Dear Reader, In this new edition you will find coverage of renewed violence in Gaza following a two-month ceasefire, evolving crises in Haiti, the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan, and recent turmoil in Syria. United Nations officials call for the protection of civilians, condemn rights violations, and underscore the urgent need for renewed negotiation and humanitarian access. Multiple UN bodies, including the International Organization for Migration, highlight the critical impact of funding cuts on essential humanitarian programs. Reports of heightened vulnerability to trafficking—particularly for children—and increased concerns over gender-based violence and discrimination against persons with disabilities also feature prominently in this issue. Updates from the International Court of Justice include new filings in contentious cases—particularly Sudan v. UAE—and additional developments in the advisory proceedings related to Palestine. Meanwhile, the International Criminal Court has commenced high-profile proceedings with the prosecution and arrest of former Filipino ruler Rodrigo Duterte over charges of crimes against humanity. The Regional News section features detailed summaries of judgments by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the European Court of Human Rights, and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. These decisions address topics ranging from forced disappearance, indigenous rights, and discrimination, to forced displacement and police misconduct. Highlights include the first Inter-American rulings with regards to indigenous peoples living in isolation, as well as the rights of Brazilian quilombola communities. For readers interested in academic and professional growth, this edition offers a broad list of publication opportunities, scholarships, fellowships, internships, entry-level jobs, as well as mid-level and senior positions. We encourage readers to review these third-party opportunities with due diligence and seize any that match their aspirations. Lastly, the Facts and Norms Institute shares two recent contributions: an Amicus Curiae brief submitted to the Inter-American Court in a forced sterilization case, and a report to the UN advocating for the integration of human rights principles into climate negotiation frameworks. Welcome to our latest edition—and thank you for reading. Professor Henrique Napoleão Alves Chief Editor
2015
No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The emergence and quick spread of the COVID-19 pandemic has shifted the focus and dynamics of the debates about global health, international law, and policy. This shift has overshadowed many of the other controversies in the international sphere. It has also highlighted the tensions that often exist in international affairs-especially in understanding the place and purpose of international institutions, vis-à-vis states, in the general schema of public international law. Central to the international response to the current pandemic is the World Health Organization (WHO)-a treaty-based organization charged with the overarching mandate of ensuring "the highest possible level of health" for all peoples. 1 Interestingly, the WHO has also become entangled in a foreign policy spat between China and the United States of America. This work explores the public international law aspects of the
2021
Vol. Volumen * The views expressed in this piece are solely the ones of the author and should in no way be attributed to the International Criminal Court. * Las opiniones expresadas en este trabajo son exclusivamente del autor y de ninguna manera pueden ser atribuidas a la Corte Penal Internacional.
This module looks at the institutional structures and substantive concepts that attempt to name and address the gravest crimes at the international level. How does the international system – states, international organisations, individuals – decide which acts are to punished, who are the perpetrators and what court can pass judgment on them. How has this system, effectively born after WWII, developed over time and why is it (or isn’t it) relevant today? We will discuss what International Criminal Law is and what it’s for. We will focus on ICL as part of general public international law, as well as a distinct political/institutional project. We will analyze the doctrine and the applications of the ‘core crimes’: genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. We will investigate the agency of individuals, both perpetrators and victims. We will look at ICL’s main judicial institutions, both domestic and international, with some special focus on the International Criminal Court. Throughout, we will critically discuss actually existing ICL through its manifestations in trials in the past, present and, potentially, future. We will make sure to highlight what International Criminal Justice has so far left out. The course aims at the in-depth knowledge and critical understanding of both the rules of international criminal law and the structures of its development and enforcement, with a view to informing practice.
2018
and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Penn State international law review, 2006
This article details the history of the Dickinson International Law Annual, Dickinson Journal of International Law, and Penn State International Law Review. Among the leading international law reviews, the article highlights the role of such publications in legal education.The Penn State International Law Review is now a well-respected academic journal in the field of international and comparative law. However, had it not been for the work of the law students who began the publication as the Dickinson International Law Annual, and other students whose dedication kept the succeeding Dickinson Journal of International Law in print, the publication might not exist today. Law school faculty and alumni have aided the publication’s development, but it has truly been a student effort.
European Journal of International Law, 2009
Amsterdam Law Forum, 2019
The Amsterdam Law Forum welcomed a team of seven new editors and three dynamic board members for the 2018-2019 academic year. Together as a team, we are proud to announce the first issue of the year: The Winter Issue. Two more issues will follow including a themed issue that will revolve around the Amsterdam Law Forum conference that is scheduled for late spring. This year, it is the ambition of the board to have all scientific articles undergo a blind peer review. We are making great progress as all scientific articles in the first issue have undergone a blind peer review. We are grateful to all the peer reviewers who have provided insightful comments to the authors. The new board of Amsterdam Law Forum is also pleased to announce that several academic scholars will be joining the 2018-2019 Advisory Board. They will provide an advisory role to the ALF board with their guidance and input. The ALF board is excited to work with them in the coming months with the next issues. The Winter Issue is proud to feature three compelling scientific articles and a captivating commentary. All articles involve aspects of international law and its ongoing importance to society.
Within the framework of the III Moscow Legal Forum the International Law Department of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL) organized a conference on the future of international law. This event brought together leading international lawyers from various Russian universities and state bodies.
Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 2014
I. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ). II. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC). III. MECHANISM FOR INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNALS (MICT). IV. SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE (SCSL)-RESIDUAL SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONA (RSCSL). V. EXTRAORDINARY CHAMBERS IN THE COURTS OF CAMBODIA (ECCC). VI. SPECIAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LEBANON (STL). VII. EFTA COURT. VIII. PERMANENT TRIBUNAL OF REVISION OF MERCOSUR (PTR) INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL TRIBUNALS GENERAL JURISDICTION I. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ) (www.icj-cij.org) 1. Judgments
THE STATUS OF THE GUANTANAMO DETAINEES BY AGNIESZKA SZPAK (POLAND) 7 THE COMBATTANT STATUS OF THE GUANTANAMO DETAINEES BY LOUIS-PHILIPPE ROUILLARD (CANADA) 21 WHAT LAW APPLIES TO THE CONFLICT IN CHECHNYA:THE LEGAL GAP OF CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW OF NON-INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICTS BY YURY SCHERBICH (BELARUS) 47 ARE THE ATROCITIES IN CHECHNYA GENOCIDE? BY YURY SCHERBICH(BELARUS) 81 LES CONFLITS ARMÉS À CARACTÈRE NON-INTERNATIONAUX « INTERNATIONALISÉS » BY LOUIS-PHILIPPE ROUILLARD (CANADA) 97 LA CÉLÉRITÉ –EXIGENCE ESSENTIELLE DU PROCÈS ÉQUITABLE (APPROCHE SUR LES TENDANCES DE LA COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME) BY ANAMARIA BUCUREANU (ROMANIA) 123 THE COMMISSION'S POWERS OF INVESTIGATION IN THE LIGHT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS BY JULIA KLUCZYŃSKA (POLAND) 133 WOMEN, ARMED CONFLICT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW BY RÉKA BEREKMÉRI-VARRÓ (HUNGARY) 137 LEGALITY OF THE THREAT OR USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS BY GABRIELLAECSEDI (HUNGARY) 149 THE LEGALITY OF THE WAR AGAINST AFGHANISTAN BY ATTILA SARI (HUNGARY) 165 THE DEROGATION REGIME OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOM BY LOUIS-PHILIPPE ROUILLARD (CANADA) 175 THE NOTION OF SUPERIOR RESPONSIBILITY IN CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW – THEORETICAL AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON THE MENTAL ELEMENT BY ERZSÉBET STRAUSZ (HUNGARY) 185 THE REGULATION OF WAR SPIES IN THE INTERNATIONAL LAW BY MÁRTA VARGA (HUNGARY) 195 CHILDREN SOLDIERS: REGULATION AND PRACTICE BY GÁBOR PAPP (HUNGARY) 203
Paper presented at the ESIL Inaugural Conference, Florence, 13-15 May 2004
American Bar Association (ABA) Year in Review, 2021
This article reviews some of the most significant developments in 2021 made by international courts and tribunals, domestic courts, and legislative developments involving issues of international criminal law, international human rights law, and international public law. This article also includes a section on protecting the attorney-client and work product privileges in internal investigations, which offers practical application for lawyers engaged in cross-border civil litigation and investigations. Giovanni Chiarini: The Philippines Situation. On October 13, 2016, the former ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda highlighted that the extrajudicial killings reported during the Philippines War on Drugs campaign (WoD) “may fall under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court if they are committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population pursuant to a State policy to commit such an attack.”77 A preliminary examination was opened on February 8, 2018, when the Office of The Prosecutor (OTP) received several communications pursuant to Rome Statute Article 15.78 Subsequently, on May 24, 2021, Bensouda requested authorisation for an investigation pursuant to Rome Statute Article 15(3), stating there is a reasonable basis to believe that crimes against humanity were committed as part of the WoD between July 1, 2016 and March 16, 2019.79 On September 15, 2021, Pre-Trial Chamber I authorized the commencement of the investigation and instructed the Registrar to provide notice of the present decision to the victims who made representations. This short essay considers the procedural issues, with special attention to jurisdiction ratione temporis, which remains, in the author’s opinion, an unresolved issue. Authors: MANISH N. BHATT, GIOVANNI CHIARINI, KATHERINE MADDOX DAVIS, BETH FARMER, TIMOTHY FRANKLIN, CYREKA C. JACOBS, STE ́PHANEDENAVACELLE,SARAL.OCHS,ALEXANDERS. VESSELINOVITCH, MELISSA GINSBERG, MARC WEITZ, AND JULIE ZORRILLA
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.