Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Citeseer
An accessible web page needs to follow the rules marked by the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) and WCAG 2.0 (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines). The problem of the rules AA of web accessibility is that they are centered on the programming ...
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2014
The expansion of the internet has become apparent in recent years, both by the number of users, and by the number of services available on the network. Considering such an expansion it is essential that the content be accessible to all people, regardless their abilities or different disabilities. Thus, it is necessary that IT professionals dedicate time and effort in planning accessible online solutions. In this paper, we proposed the Homero framework in order to support the development of accessible interface layer of web applications. Developed using the PHP language, the Homero framework automates the generation of web pages in accordance with guidelines defined in Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. In order to provide evidence of the quality of web applications generated using the framework, an empirical study was conducted. The results showed the effectiveness of Homero to assist the development of accessible web applications, achieving level AAA in automatically detectable WCAG 2.0 success criteria.
Quality and Communicability for …, 2010
Accessibility is essential for every system or product in order to guarantee equal opportunity for access and use to all, including the differently-abled. Thus it is crucial to remove any technological barriers for special needs users, who explore the Internet by assistive technologies. However, ensuring efficient and satisfactory (in other words, usable) interaction with user interfaces (UIs) of products or services must occur in the design phase, in order to produce UIs that are universally simple to understand, rapid and easy to use. Applying accessibility and usability criteria from the very beginning of the design phase is much less costly than introducing it later, so specific guidelines should be followed from the earliest stages of the design process. In the long run, creating accessible and usable Web UIs will improve overall efficiency and effectiveness of interaction for any individual and organization. developers can only implement good design by becoming aware of all the obstacles encountered by users aided by assistive technologies. Likewise, making interaction with the user interfaces (UIs) of products or services effective, efficient and satisfactory (in other words, usable (International Standard Organization [ISO], 1998) is another pillar of the design phase .
2002
ABSTRACT There is still a large percentage of web resources that are inaccessible to many individuals. The authors previously developed a meta-method for evaluating the accessibility of existing web resources and now feel there is a need to provide advice on designing for accessibility during the development lifecycle. Despite the large quantity of resources on accessible design now available, there is still a shortage of practical information for web developers on the steps to be taken towards implementation.
Proceedings of California State University Northridge - Sixteenth Annual International Conference on Technology and Persons with Disabilities., 2001
Web instruction is not the only aspect of academic life that is growing. The ranks of online journals are expanding rapidly, as print journals add archives to the web. This paper discusses the importance to the academic community of making all web resources, including web journals, accessible to all. The researchers will present a pragmatic approach to the problem. A handout will be available with specific directions for online journals and for web courses. There will also be a discussion of icons that can be placed on websites to show accessibility, including an new icon specifically designed for the field of education. A look at the future will explain the use of XML / XSLT files that can transform both presentation and content to produce accessible pages. This protocol, being developed for wireless technologies such as cell phones and organizers, can also address the needs of the disabled if properly applied.
WORLD WIDE WEBINTERNET AND WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2012
Efforts to improve Web accessibility are intensifying around the world. For example, in June 2004, the Japanese Standards Association established JIS X 8341-3 as an official Japanese industrial standard for information accessibility. When a company constructs an accessible Website as part of a Web accessibility enhancement program, it should not only conform to JIS X 8341-3 but also provide a support system for organized corporate activities, standardize its procedures for Website construction, and use guidelines that are consistent with standards in Japan and other countries. The Fujitsu Group started enhancing the accessibility of its Internet Websites in 2002 as part of its brand development project. It enjoyed high commendations when it received a 2003 Good Design Award and won first prize in the Usability Ranking of Corporate Sites of the Nikkei Personal Computing magazine. This paper describes the Fujitsu organized activities for enhancing Web accessibility that yielded these results and the Fujitsu system for realizing accessible Websites.
2009
Design of accessible Web applications is a complex challenge. The presented concept demonstrates the potential of model-based and user-centered development. Based on Web accessibility patterns, a suitable solution is discussed which can be used to simplify the development process. Using an established approach from Web engineering, the use of patterns is demonstrated.
2021
The vision of providing access to all web content equally for all users makes web accessibility a fundamental goal of today’s internet. Web accessibility is the practice of removing barriers from websites that could hinder functionality for users with various disabilities. Web accessibility is measured against the accessibility guidelines such as WCAG, GIGW, and so on. WCAG 2.2 is the latest set of guidelines for web accessibility that helps in making websites accessible. The web accessibility tools available in the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), only conform up to WCAG 2.1 guidelines, while no tools exist for the latest set of guidelines. Despite the availability of several tools to check the conformity of websites with WCAG 2.1 guidelines, there is a scarcity of tools that are both open source and scalable. To support automated accessibility evaluation of numerous websites against WCAG 2.2, 2.1, and 2.0 we present a tool, WAccess. WAccess highlights violations of 13 guidelines f...
Proceedings of the …, 2005
Currently, the vast majority of web sites do not support accessibility for visually impaired users. Usually, these users have to rely on screen readers: applications that sequentially read the content of a web page in audio. Unfortunately, screen readers are not able to detect the meaning of the different page objects, and thus the implicit semantic knowledge conveyed in the presentation of the page is lost. One approach described in literature to tackle this problem, is the Dante approach, which allows semantic annotation of web pages to provide screen readers with extra (semantic) knowledge to better facilitate the audio presentation of a web page. Until now, such annotations were done manually, and failed for dynamic pages. In this paper, we combine the Dante approach with a web design method, WSDM, to fully automate the generation of the semantic annotation for visually impaired users. To do so, the semantic knowledge gathered during the design process is exploited, and the annotations are generated as a by-product of the design process, requiring no extra effort from the designer.
Journal of Access Services, 2009
The Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) was established to enhance the accessibility of Web resources for people with disabilities. In this article we argue that although WAI's advocacy work has been very successful, the WAI approach is flawed. Rather than WAI's emphasis on adoption of technical guidelines, the authors argue that the priority should be for a user-focused approach, which embeds best practices through the development of achievable policies and processes and which includes all stakeholders in the process of maximizing accessibility. The article describes a Tangram model, which provides a pluralistic approach to Web accessibility, and provides case studies that illustrate use of this approach. The article describes work that has informed the ideas in this article and plans for further work, including an approach to advocacy and education that coins the term Accessibility 2.0 to describe a renewed approach to accessibility, which builds on previous work but prioritizes the importance of the user.
Many websites remain inaccessible for people with disabilities, despite the availability of relevant guidelines and tools. This is mainly due to lack of training of Web designers on accessibility technology. This need is addressed, by ESALP, presented in this paper, a web-based application that is meant to be used as a tool to disseminate and teach Web accessibility guidelines and good design practices. The tool adopts an example-based learning approach. First, it exposes people to the accessibility impasses that arise when certain, established guidelines are violated, and then provides concise advice on how to avoid or resolve them. These examples were derived from an in-depth, Web accessibility evaluation study of 50 Greek websites. The results of this study, in agreement to similar studies, also indicated that the accessibility of the Greek Web is rather low. We argue that the presented tool could help in improving the accessibility of websites by increasing awareness, motivating and educating Web development stakeholders on the subject of accessibility.
Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication - SIGDOC '08, 2008
Including accessibility in the design of Websites 1.0 entails difficulties, but this situation becomes more complicated when the user becomes a creator in the web. There are new requirements to be considered in the design due to the user's active interaction in the web 2.0 environment, such as the web pages with user-generated content (like Blogs), where there are not
2012
Web Engineering (WE) methods have evolved to support different concerns during the development process of current Web-based systems, as context-awareness, Business-to- Business (B2B) process modeling, Rich Internet Applications (RIAs) and live-regions or quality factors to improve users' experience. Therefore, developers have conceptual tools to focus on these concerns in advance, but unfortunately, the situation is not the same to early accessibility design. In this paper we provide a briefly overview of our proposal, called Aspect-Oriented Web Accessibility Design (AO-WAD), and generalize its use within some of the best known WE approaches to provide accessibility support through Aspect- Orientation techniques. We embed AO-WAD into OOHDM, UWE and OOWS methods and propitiate an ease understanding through a motivating example.
Disability and Rehability: Assistive Technology
"Purpose This article asserts that current approaches to enhance the accessibility of Web resources fail to provide a solid foundation for the development of a robust and future-proofed framework. In particular, they fail to take advantage of new technologies and technological practices. The article introduces a framework for Web adaptability, which encourages the development of Web-based services that can be resilient to the diversity of uses of such services, the target audience, available resources, technical innovations, organisational policies and relevant definitions of 'accessibility'. Method The article refers to a series of author-focussed approaches to accessibility through which the authors and others have struggled to find ways to promote accessibility for people with disabilities. These approaches depend upon the resource author's determination of the anticipated users' needs and their provision. Through approaches labelled as 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0, the authors have widened their focus to account for contexts and individual differences in target audiences. Now, the authors want to recognise the role of users in determining their engagement with resources (including services). To distinguish this new approach, the term 'adaptability' has been used to replace 'accessibility'; new definitions of accessibility have been adopted, and the authors have reviewed their previous work to clarify how it is relevant to the new approach. Results Accessibility 1.0 is here characterised as a technical approach in which authors are told how to construct resources for a broadly defined audience. This is known as universal design. Accessibility 2.0 was introduced to point to the need to account for the context in which resources would be used, to help overcome inadequacies identified in the purely technical approach. Accessibility 3.0 moved the focus on users from a homogenised universal definition to recognition of the idiosyncratic needs and preferences of individuals and to cater for them. All of these approaches placed responsibility within the authoring/publishing domain without recognising the role the user might want to play, or the roles that other users in social networks, or even Web services might play. Conclusions Adaptability shifts the emphasis and calls for greater freedom for the users to facilitate individual accessibility in the open Web environment. "
Flexibility and adaptivity are two of the outstanding characteristics of new media and new technologies. These properties allow new methods to provide physically challenged people with appropriate information. To build accessible Web applications, one has to respect the needs from the beginning of the design process. However, it is difficult to integrate the requirements of accessibility guidelines into modern web design. Based on recent proposals for model-based Web application development, we discuss the essential modeling requirements to ensure enhanced accessibility in Web applications.
"The W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) has a well-established framework for addressing accessibility based on three components: the accessibility of Web content, accessibility support in browsers and accessibility support in authoring tools, with a corresponding set of guidelines for each. These guidelines have been successful in raising awareness in Web accessibility at a political level, but have been less successful than might have been expected influencing the wider promotion and adoption of accessibility in Web technology. This is increasingly apparent as Web content becomes increasingly heterogeneous in terms of source, type, author and function. Standards, policy and guidelines overwhelmingly focus on accessibility of the end product – i.e. the Web page or site - and not the process used to create it. This is at odds with the transformation of Web-based user goals from receipt of static information to communication, and receipt or delivery of services and experiences. Thus it is the accessibility of the end goal that should be critical, and is dependent on the quality of the route(s) available to reaching that goal - making assessing accessibility of a technical unit such as a Web page less relevant. Instead, we argue a holistic approach is necessary – one that views positively, where appropriate, aggregation of alternatives in a way that allows each route to provide the best possible chance for disabled users to achieve the end goal, even if individual routes may themselves exclude certain groups. Since 2004 the authors have developed a framework for addressing the accessibility of Web resources, inspired by the holistic use of Web technology in e-learning, building on WAI guidelines but providing the flexibility needed to address the limitations of the guidelines and the diverse ways in which the Web is now being used. This paper reflects how the influence and impact of WCAG has changed over time, and, by reviewing the authors’ work conducted in recent years, considers how a more holistic approach to Web Accessibility in a Web 2.0 world can best be achieved. "
2012
Mature Web Engineering (WE) approaches provide good resources for developing Web 2.0 applications. The state-of-the-art shows that many of these approaches have evolved for providing support to different issues during the development process of these kind of applications, as business-to-business process modeling, context-awareness, RIAs and live-regions or quality factors for improving users’ experience. Focusing on Accessibility, having full support usually means being tightly coupled to host process and models, which prevents conveying this support to other WE approaches. In this paper we introduce our proposal, called Aspect-Oriented Web Accessibility Design (AO-WAD), and generalize its use within WE approaches to provide Accessibility support applying Aspect-Orientation techniques. We embed AO-WAD into OOHDM and UWE methods to propitiate an ease understanding through a motivating example.
Journal of Information and …, 2007
Semantic Web approaches try to get the interoperability and communication among technologies and organizations. Nevertheless, sometimes it is forgotten that the Web must be useful for every user, consequently it is necessary to include tools and techniques doing Semantic Web be accessible. Accessibility and usability are two usually joined concepts widely used in web application development, however their meaning are different. Usability means the way to make easy the use but accessibility is referred to the access possibility. For the first one, there are many well proved approaches in real cases. However, accessibility field requires a deeper research that will make feasible the access to disable people and also the access to novel non-disable people due to the cost to automate and maintain accessible applications. In this paper, we propose one architecture to achieve the accessibility in web-environments dealing with the WAI accessibility standard and the Universal Design paradigm. This architecture tries to control the accessibility in web applications development life-cycle following a methodology starting from a semantic conceptual model and leans on description languages and controlled vocabularies.
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009
The treatment of Web accessibility is not only following the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) to strictly comply with technical aspects. The development processes of web applications are very much centred in the architecture, which are normally very distant to the user. This requires integrating usability and accessibility in software engineering processes incorporating a User-Centered Design (UCD) and Inclusive Design. In this paper, an integration of usability techniques in the whole life cycle of a web application is shown. This work is part of AWA framework (Accessibility for Web Applications) that provides a methodological support for the development of accessible web applications.
Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on Design of communication - SIGDOC '13, 2013
The Web is currently the main way of providing computing services, reaching a larger number of users with different characteristics. As the complexity and interactivity of systems is increased, users become more demanding towards all the requirements associated to their distinct needs. Implementing the interaction requirements in the Web has become the main focus of accessibility and usability studies, describing essential design features which provide users with quality, assured systems. The focus on the users reinforced that as the number of users grows and the system became available to a wide variety of users, accessibility and usability features become even more critical to a Web application's success. In this paper, we present ACCESSA, a practical approach to rapidly improve the accessibility of existing Web systems, acting mainly in the interface design with no changes to the functional requirements of systems. The ACCESSA is based on the WCAG 2.0 guidelines and other patterns, choosing the guidelines that present lower implementation costs and represent higher severity accessibility issues.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.