Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2015, CoDesign
…
13 pages
1 file
This article starts from the paradox that, although participation is a defining trait of participatory design (PD), there are few explicit discussions in the PD literature of what constitutes participation. Thus, from a point of departure in Actor-Network Theory (ANT), this article develops an analytical understanding of participation. It is argued that participation is a matter of concern, something inherently unsettled, to be investigated and explicated in every design project. Specifically, it is argued that (1) participation is an act overtaken by numerous others, rather than carried out by individuals and (2) that participation partially exists in all elements of a project. These traits are explicated in a design project called 'Teledialogue', where the participants are unfolded as networks of reports, government institutions, boyfriends, social workers and so on. The argument is synthesised as three challenges for PD:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2016
The paper explores what exactly it is that users participate in when being involved in participatory design (PD), relating this discussion to the CSCW perspective on collaborative design work. We argue that a focus on decision-making in design is necessary for understanding participation in design. Referring to Schön we see design as involving creating choices, selecting among them, concretizing choices and evaluating the choices. We discuss how these kinds of activities have played out in four PD projects that we have participated in. Furthermore, we show that the decisions are interlinked, and discuss the notion of decision linkages. We emphasize the design result as the most important part of PD. Finally, participation is discussed as the sharing of power, asking what the perspective of power and decision-making adds to the understanding of design practices.
Interactions, 2018
We recently edited a special issue of the ACM ToCHI journal on Re-Imagining Participatory Design (Bannon et al. 2018a) and as a result of this process, and the earlier work leading up to it, we have had many interesting discussions concerning Participatory Design (PD) and where it stands today. We refer the reader to the ToCHI special issue for details of the various contributions, but present here some further discussion of the themes that emerged as we ourselves discussed this topic of reimagining PD. The history of the field, and the ongoing debates about the general concept of "participation," have been discussed elsewhere (Simonsen and Robertson 2012, Vines et al. 2013, etc.). We have also been inspired by material in the CoDesign journal special issue on "Unfolding Participation over Time in the
Participatory Design, 2004
As computer technologies start to permeate the everyday activities of a continuously growing population, social and technical as well as political and legal issues will surface. Participatory design is asked to take a more critical view of participation, design, technology, and the arenas in which the network of actors and artifacts dialectically construct the social orders. This paper has a
CoDesign, 2017
This special issue on participatory design in an era of participation presents emerging topics and discussions from the thirteenth Participatory Design Conference (PDC), held at Aarhus University in August 2016. The PDC 2016 marked the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Participatory Design conference series, which began in 1990 with the first biannual conference in Seattle. Since then, the PDC conferences have continued to bring together a multidisciplinary, international community of researchers and practitioners around issues of cooperative design. The theme for the 2016 PDC conference was 'Participatory Design in an Era of Participation'. Critical and constructive discussions were invited on the values, characteristics, politics and future practices of participatory design in an era in which participation has now become per
Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1998
We characterize Participatory Design (PD) as a maturing area of research and as an evolving practice among design professionals. Although PD has been applied outside of technology design, here we focus on PD in relation to the introduction of computer-based systems at work. We discuss three main issues addressed by PD researchers; the politics of design; the nature of participation; and method, tools and techniques for participation. We also report on the conditions for the transfer of “PD results” to workers, user groups, and design professionals that have characterized PD over time and across geopolitical terrains. The topic of the sustainability of PD within an organizational context is also considered. The article concludes with a discussion of common issues explored within PD and CSCW and frames directions for a continuing dialogue between researchers and practitioners from the two fields. The article draws on a review of PD and CSCW literatures as well as on our own research and practical experiences.
CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 2018
Participatory design (PD) research has historically strongly focused on the reporting of design events (e.g. workshops and prototyping activities with participants), where issues such as ‘involving users’, including the users’ point of view, and participation as a matter of mutual learning have been in the foreground. The need to further problematise and critically examine participation is nonetheless apparent. This special issue aims to shed light on participation as it unfolds over time during, between and beyond participatory events such as these. Here, we build an overview of existing directions taken by researchers to address the unfolding of participation in IT design over time. We do this by examining existing PD literature and the four contributions to this special issue. We identify two common temporalities in PD, the future-oriented and the project-based, and propose five lenses that may aid researchers in exploring and understanding the temporal dimensions of participatio...
2012
This article is a call to describe Participatory Design (PD) projects in the making, i.e. to show how the heterogeneous elements in the field are gradually organised in a participatory manner as the projects progress. It is based on two arguments. The first is a negative argument. Very often, PD projects are not described in the making. As a result, the landmarks to be used to evaluate them remain unclear or invisible. The second argument is of a more positive nature. The articles that do describe projects in the making enable landmarks to be defined that can be effectively used to evaluate PD projects. The notion of emerging groups is one of these landmarks.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Journal of Design, Planning and Aesthetics Research
Nordes 2017: Design and Power, 2017
Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction
Design Studies, 1996
Design Issues, 2012
Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group on Design: Open 24/7 - OZCHI '09, 2009
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
Configuring User-Designer Relations: Interdisciplinary perspectives, 2009
Proceedings of ACM CHI 2013, 2013
Proceedings of Design Research Society Wonder …, 2006
Participatory Design Conference, 1992
Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems