Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Strange People -- Rare Events

2004, Proceedings of Presented Papers, The Parapsychological Association, 47th Annual Convention

Abstract

A number of extremely small groups within the population that are in the possession of distinct 'gifts' or 'abilities' such as absolute pitch, synesthesia, and mental calculations skills, are identified and placed in a parallel with the likewise small group of 'sensitives' and 'mediums' in parapsychology. The widely discussed question whether 'psi' is 'democratically' distributed is touched upon as it appears that these other abilities are definitely not equally distributed. (This is a touchy subject in our society: whether or not all humans are in a certain sense equal or whether there are some differences.) Some parallels (and differentiations, too) between the two groups (absolute pitch, synesthesia, and mental calculation skills on one hand and 'sensitives' and 'mediums' on the other) are examined, e. g. the fact that these properties can hardly be trained either they are present or they arenot. Absolute pitch and mental calculations are 'composite' functions, in both cases the ability to memorize plays an important role. The question raises whether 'psi' is perhaps also a cluster of different abilities, apart from the problem that the entire notion of 'psi' as an 'ability' is highly questionable. Another question is the consistency of performance, be it the performance of one individual at different times (intrasubjective) or be it within several individuals (intersubjective) as in the case of comparative studies of sensitives and mediums. The emphasis of the paper, however, is on the fact that mainstream psychology and physiology carry out research into the particular abilities of very special persons who are clearly different from the vast majority and who form an extremely tiny minority of the population (in the case of the Mathematical Wizards just a handful individuals all over the world at any one time). From the point of philosophy of science this research may serve as a precedent for the legitimacy of research into the likewise rare 'gifted' people called sensitives or mediums. Thus their small sample size cannot be used as an argument against this kind of research. The lesser the number of individuals on one hand, the more outstanding and unique their performance on the other investigations will progressively shift of from the 'nomothetic' to the 'idiographic' pole. Besides these 'strange' people the situation of rare or even unique events is discussed. Here again the idiographic and the nomothetic approach are balanced against one another, viewing upon the 'rare events' once more from the point of philosophy of science. Thus, without going into details of methodological issues it is argued that research into these fields, too, has some precedence in mainstream science. Not only is such research legitimate, moreover, any challenges to it (both from the skeptics' camp and from inside the parapsychological community) based on the sole ground of the rareness of cases must be rejected with reference to the outlined precedents in mainstream science.