Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Heidegger's Jews: Inclusion/Exclusion and Heidegger's Anti- Semitism

Abstract

Heidegger’s thinking once seemed to bear on everything and every philosopher, from the Pre-Socratics, such as Anaximander and Parmenides as well as Heraclitus, to Plato himself, to Aristotle as well as Plotinus and Augustine, Duns Scotus and Aquinas and all the modern names like Descartes and Leibniz. Kant, too, as well as Hegel, Schelling, Kierkegaard, Marx, Dilthey and arguably above all: Nietzsche. And Heidegger read Husserl. But with the publication of the Black Notebooks, everything turns around. If Heidegger could remind us as he does precisely in his reflections on the very idea of the Nachlaß as such, reflections constituting a central focus beginning with the first volume of the Black Notebooks arguing that posthumous works work – this is their Wirkungsgeschichte – to invert the order of time, the effect effected in what I call the “black night” of the Black Notebooks, has to be a Kehre to beat them all. Emmanuel Faye’s former student, Sidonie Kellerer, has even suggested that the turn itself was invented as a cover for a more insidious concern: anti-Semitism at the core. Thus, it seems Heidegger was preoccupied less with the Seinsfrage than the Judenfrage, particularly in terms of what Peter Trawny characterizes as Heidegger’s now ineliminable seinsgeschichtliche Antisemitismus, an obsession with Weltjudentum, wherein Heidegger is also revealed as having been fatally one-sided in his naming of names in the history of philosophy, especially his contemporaries and students. NB: This is an author's corrigendum addressing print artifacts or typographer's errors. For the printed and official version, but also for the contributions in the issue, please see the publisher's official website: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rbsp20/47/2