Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1988
This volume begins with a series of four papers on retirement saving of individuals and the saving which results from corporate funding of their pension plans. The first paper discusses individual retirement accounts (IRAs). The second considers reasons why more individual retirement saving is not used to purchase annuities. The third examines the reasons for recent reductions in saving through private pension plans. The fourth deals with poverty among retirees, whose saving preparation for retirement may have been inadequate. Following are two papers that address particular aspects of pension plans themselves: The first considers the relative merits of defined benefit versus defined contribution plans from the perspective of the employee wishing to avoid retirement income uncertainty. The second is an empirical investigation of the relationship between pension plan provisions and job turnover.
This volume begins with a series of four papers on retirement saving of individuals and the saving which results from corporate funding of their pension plans. The first paper discusses individual retirement accounts (IRAs). The second considers reasons why more individual retirement saving is not used to purchase annuities. The third examines the reasons for recent reductions in saving through private pension plans. The fourth deals with poverty among retirees, whose saving preparation for retirement may have been inadequate. Following are two papers that address particular aspects of pension plans themselves: The first considers the relative merits of defined benefit versus defined contribution plans from the perspective of the employee wishing to avoid retirement income uncertainty. The second is an empirical investigation of the relationship between pension plan provisions and job turnover.
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, 1983
Old age income security is one of society's most pressing concerns. A decline in family support of the aged, major increases in the length of retirement, and social security's long-term financial difficulty are all reasons for the growing anxiety. Consideration of current and past socioeconomic data provides a solid basis for this anxiety. Between 1950 and 1970 the fraction of the aged living with their children declined from 31 to 9 percent.' Today fewer than 3 percent of elderly households receive income from their children.z These contributions represent less than 1 percent of the income of the e l d e r l ~. ~ Life expectancy for males at age 25 is 46.9 additional years, up from 44.6 years in 1 950.4 Despite this increase, the average number of years worked by 25-year-old males has declined by 3.13 years.5 Together, these changes have almost doubled the expected duration of retirement and other nonworking periods for males from 5.93 years to 11.47 years. The ratio of nonworking to working years for males is now .32, more than twice the 1950 value. For females, growth in the expected work span, associated with dramatic postwar increases in labor force participation, has exceeded growth in the expected life span by 3.26 years. However, if one measures female work years on a male-equivalent earnings basis, the average young adult's expected nonworking period has increased by 3.60 years.6According to this measure, 25-year-olds can now expect to spend 1.2 years out of the work force for every year they spend in the work force.' Difficulties in financing an extended retirement without major family support have been eased considerably by sizable increases in real social security benefits. These benefits now represent the major source of income for 54 percent of the aged.8 However, the continued reliance on social security benefits as the primary source of old age income support is becoming increasingly unlikely. Demographic changes continue to place the Social Security System in a long-term financial crisis. Changes in fertility rates are expected to lower the ratio of social security contributors to beneficiaries from the current value of 3.2 to 1.5 by the year 2040.9The 1983 social security legislation notwithstanding, unless additional measures are enacted shortly, social security tax rates, including health insurance tax rates, could rise as high as 25 percent by the early part of the next century to meet projected benefit payments.lo The rapid growth of private, state, and local pensions in the 1950% 1960s, and 1970s represents a natural response to changes in family support of the elderly, an expansion of the retirement period, and uncertainty concerning the amount of retirement income one can expect from social security. Special tax incentives, a recognition of the advantages of group insurance policies, and the use of fringe benefits to avoid periodic government wage controls are important additional explanations of pension growth. The American pension system is, however, more than simply the inevitable product of changing social, demographic, and economic conditions. Pensions themselves are playing an increasingly important role in shaping social conditions and altering economic behavior. Pensions and the Economics of Aging 1 1.3 The Emerging Role of Pensions in the American Economy: Postwar Patterns of Growth Private, state, and local pensions now cover over 45.28 percent of the U.S. labor force. In 1950 the figure was 19.93 percent. Coverage of private wage and salary workers more
1984
Pensions influence retirement decisions. The analysis provides a framework for assessing the phenomenon. The qualitative features of most defined benefit pension plans in the United States, as the first section demonstrates, can be used to induce optimal retirement choices. Pensions are viewed as a form of forced savings; their purpose is to enable the worker to "commit himself" by making it in his own self-interest to retire at an appropriate age. The remaining sections examine the use of pensions in populations that are heterogeneous with respect to such features as disutility of work or expected lifespan.
Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1991
1989
This paper develops the view that employer-sponsored pension plans are best understood as retirement income insurance for employees and from that perspective addresses a number of questions regarding the reasons for their existence, their design, and their funding and investment policies. The most important of these questions are: -Why do employers provide pension plans for their employees and why is participation usually mandatory? -
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
This study examines the effect of various social, demographic, and economic variables on retirement preparation and discusses ways in which policy makers can use this information to mandate legislation that will motivate individuals to save for retirement. Using data from the Survey of Consumer Finances, probit analysis indicates that respondents' income and job tenure have significant positive effects on predicting employer sponsored pension plan eligibility. Conversely, the findings do not support the assumption that the probability of pension plan eligibility increases with age and education levels. In addition, we did not find race, marital status or home ownership to be significant factors in pension plan eligibility. Regarding contributions to pension plans, the findings indicate that income, education and net worth have significant positive effects on whether or not an individual is contributing to a plan. Conversely, the findings regarding household size were significant and negative regarding the contribution decision. Race, health, and an individual's savings habits do not appear to have significant effects on the decision to contribute to employer sponsored pension plans. Additional findings; however, indicate that individuals who report the reason for saving is retirement are more likely to contribute to their pension plans. Finally, the results regarding future expectations for the economy were insignificant in relation to whether or not an individual was contributing to his or her pension plan. The findings may be used to aid policy makers in targeting particular groups of individuals to motivate them to contribute to their company sponsored retirement plans. Policies that encourage retirement planning education programs as well as tax credits on contributions made by individuals in the lower and middle income tax brackets are just a couple of suggestions that could motivate specific groups of individuals to save for retirement.
1987
Distingiishing "spot" versus "contract" views of the labor market is of critical importance to a host of economic issues ranging from wage flexibility over the business cycle to firm financial valuation. The structural features of U.S. private pension plans permit surprisingly strong inferences concerning the incentive effects of private pension plan provisions and the contractual nature of the U.S. labor market. This paper examines the accrual of vested pension benefits of a nation-wide sample of pension plans. We find strikingly large discontinuities in the profile by age of the ratio of annual accrued pension benefits to the standard wage. These discontinuities primarily occur at the ages of full vesting and early retirement. Representative plans often exhibit absolute changes in accrual ratios of 20 to 30 percentage points at these ages. The provisions of many plans imply large negative accruals after the age of early retirement. Job change typically involves a large loss in pension wealth as well. Since the average worker's marginal product presumably changes smoothly as he or she ages, these pension data can only be reconciled with spot market clearing if age wage profiles within a firm exhibit exactly offsetting discontinuities at key ages. Casual inspection of firm wage setting behavior rules out this requirement of spot market clearing. In our view the magnitude, patterns, and variations in pension accrual ratios are strikingly at odds with spot market equilibrium. While market clearing in longer term contracts seems the only equilibrium theory consistent with these findings, it also strains our credulity to ascribe optimizing behavior to the pension accrual profiles chosen by a vast array of U.S. businesses. In the process of presenting these profiles we also consider the following questions concerning U.S. pensions. What are the incentive effects of private pension plans? What is the cost in pension benefits of job turnover? How important is vesting? Is there a cost in pension benefits of foregoing the early retirement option? Do pension stipulations encourage early retirement? While the considerable heterogeneity of pension plan provisions permits no simple or single answer to these questions, the data suggest that pensions can have major incentive effects on job turnover and retirement. In general pensions represent a very significant factor, and at certain ages, a dominant factor in employee compensation.
2015
The last twenty years witnessed a rather striking transformation in the world’s pension environment. Population aging and workforce changes in virtually all developed countries have sparked new forms of retirement provision. This pressure, combined with global financial market integration, has altered how people think about, and save for, retirement. As a case in point, many countries in the Western Hemisphere have moved away from a defined benefit (DB) pension model toward defined contribution (DC) plans, where participants ’ assets are accumulated and invested in capital markets. This has been a strong trend in Latin America, and
2003
Defined benefit pension plans have become considerably less common since the early 1980s, while defined contribution plans have spread. Previous research showed that defined benefit plans, with sharp incentives encouraging retirement after a certain point, contributed to the striking postwar decline in American retirement ages. In this paper we find that the absence of age-related incentives in defined contribution plans leads workers to retire almost two years later on average, compared to workers with defined benefit plans. Thus, the evolution of pension structure can help explain recent increases in employment among people in their 60s, after decades of decline.
2001
The past twenty years witnessed a rather striking transformation in the world's pension environment. Population aging and workforce changes in virtually all developed countries have sparked new forms of retirement provision. This pressure, combined with global Wnancial market integration, has altered how people think about, and save for, retirement. As a case in point, many countries in the Western Hemisphere have moved away from a deWned beneWt (DB) pension model toward deWned contribution (DC) plans, where participants' assets are accumulated and invested in capital markets. This has been a strong trend in Latin America, and similar changes have emerged in the United Kingdom, Germany, and most recently, Japan. The U.S. pension environment has changed as well, with workers increasingly interested in retirement accumulation accounts and moving into deWned contribution pensions in response to the robust stock market performance at the end of the twentieth century. In the United States, as elsewhere, rising life expectancies and longer periods of labor market attachment have also enhanced the appeal of pensions for groups that previously lacked coverage years ago, such as among women. 1 Employers here, as elsewhere, are increasingly willing and even eager to provide new forms of pensions, responding to changes in the industrial and occupational mix of employment, and to an interest in using pensions to induce particular worker behaviors. 2 The pension arena has also been shaped by U.S. regulatory developments including legislation liberalizing tax treatment of pension funding levels, contribution amounts, and beneWt payouts (McGill et al. 1996). In sum, the last two decades have been favorable to a dynamic pension environment in the United States, just as in the rest of the world. Nevertheless, the historical legacy in the U.S. pension arena has been the deWned beneWt model, and as such, this plan type remains important to millions of workers and their employers. Nevertheless, companies that provided DB plans did not stand still: these sponsors too altered many aspects
Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1985
D z t n b u r y . C T Danvers Town. MA D a n v l l l e . W A D a u p h i n C , PA' De K a l b C , GA D e a r b o r n . M I D e l a w a r e C , PA D e n v e r School D i s t r i c t . CO Denve-School D ~s t r ~c t . CO D e n v e r . CO
Why People Retire The purpose of this analysis is to identify the role of pensions in affecting individuals' retirement decisions. At the outset, it is important to identify why retirement occurs; seven factors play a role in our models. They Working Paper 970. New York: Columbia University Press. this volume. and normal retirement. Journal of Gerontology. this volume. strictions on recipients. American Economic Review (May).
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.