Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Despite the importance of the planktonic larval stage in intertidal bivalves, our understanding of this stage is not well developed. One of the important limitations in quantification of planktonic larval distributions is the identification of sampled larvae. Identification of larvae is difficult due to the uniform morphology of many larval species. Microscopic identification was mostly used for this purpose in the past. The problem with this technique is that direct identification requires specialist knowledge. Recently, considerable progress has been made in identification of bivalve larvae using immunological techniques or molecular biology. However, not every laboratory doing larval research is equipped for molecular or immunological identification of bivalve larvae and these techniques are time consuming and costly. The recent improvements in imagine analysis technology and the reduction in cost of such equipment make optical techniques for identification of bivalve larvae interesting again. We evaluate bivalve larvae reared in our laboratory (Crassostrea gigas, Cerastoderma edule, Macoma balthica, Mytilus edulis) and literature data of larvae from the 1960s using image analysis techniques. We use this dataset to compile species-specific dimensions (length -width of the larval shell) and shape parameters (contour of the larval shell). The first method yields different slopes when length and width are plotted against each other but regression lines overlap, which makes the technique impractical for field identification. Multidimensional scaling of larval shape within one species shows shape-development of the larvae during ontogeny. Linear discriminant analysis did not produce results when the whole data set was used. But discriminant analysis on larger individuals (length > 150 µm) was relatively successful for species for which sufficient individuals were available. The identity of up to 74 % of the larvae could be predicted correctly.
Journal of Sea Research, 2005
Despite the importance of the planktonic larval stage in intertidal bivalves, our understanding of this stage is still insufficient. A major obstacle in the quantification of planktonic larval distributions is the identification of sampled larvae. Identification is difficult due to the uniform morphology of many larval species. We evaluated the morphology of bivalve larvae reared in our laboratory (Crassostrea gigas, Cerastoderma edule, Macoma balthica, Mytilus edulis) and literature data on larvae from the 1960s, using image analysis techniques. We used this dataset to compile species-specific dimensions (length-width of the larval shell) and shape parameters (contour of the larval shell). The first method yielded different slopes when length and width were plotted against each other, but regression lines overlapped, which rendered the technique impractical for field identification. Multidimensional scaling of larval shape within one species showed shape development of the larvae during ontogeny. Linear discriminant analysis did not produce results when the whole data set was used. But discriminant analysis on larger individuals (length N 150 Am) was relatively successful for species of which sufficient individuals were available. The identity of up to 74% of the large larvae could be predicted correctly. D
2005
The identification of effective, nontoxic means for physically marking and tracking marine invertebrate larvae is a necessary step towards meeting a major goal of modern marine population biology, the direct measurement of larval dispersal. An inexpensive, rapid and effective means for marking bivalve larvae would be particularly useful because, as a taxonomic group, bivalves contain many commercially important and exploited species. Likewise, bivalves produce large numbers of propagules for experimental procedures and, for many species, methods for rearing larvae have been well established. Calcein has been used as a marker in numerous studies of adults and juveniles of calcium-carbonate-containing marine organisms, but its effects on small and sensitive life history stages such as embryos and larvae can be detrimental. We show that calcein can be used to rapidly and effectively mark large numbers of larvae from two bivalve species, Argopecten irradians concentricus (Say, 1822) (the Bay Scallop) and Mytilus trossulus Gould, 1850 (the Bay Mussel). Calcein had no detectable negative effects on growth or survivorship of larvae of either species; therefore, this fluorescent mark should serve as a useful tool for directly tracking dispersal of these species in the field. Our marking method is simple and inexpensive and can easily be used to determine the effectiveness and potential toxicity of the calcein mark for other bivalves.
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 2016
Bivalve larvae are small (50-400 lm) and difficult to identify using standard microscopy, thus limiting inferences from samples collected in the field. With the advent of ShellBi, an image analysis technique, accurate identification of bivalve larvae is now possible but rapid image acquisition and processing remains a challenge. The objectives of this research were to (1) develop a benchtop automated image acquisition system for use with ShellBi, (2) evaluate the system, and (3) create a protocol that would maintain high classification accuracies for larvae of the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica. The automated system decreased image acquisition time from 2-13 h to 46 min per slide and resulted in the highest classification accuracies at the lowest tested magnification (7X) and shortest image acquisition time (46 min). Quality control tests indicated that classification accuracies were sensitive to camera and light source settings and that measuring changes in light source and color channel intensities over time was an important part of quality control during routine operations. Validation experiments indicated that under proper settings, automated image acquisition coupled with ShellBi could rapidly classify C. virginica larvae with high accuracies (80-93%). Results suggest that this automated image acquisition system coupled with ShellBi can be used to rapidly image plankton samples and classify C. virginica larvae allowing for expanded capability to understand bivalve larval ecology in the field. Additionally, the automated system has application for rapidly imaging other planktonic organisms at high magnification.
Journal of Shellfish Research, 2008
Bivalve larvae in mixed samples collected from the field have traditionally been identified through morphological differences among species. It is difficult, however, to use this method accurately because of overlapping size ranges and similar shapes of the larvae of many species. We used the molecular technique developed by Hare et al. (2000) to test the accuracy of morphological identification of Mercenaria mercenaria (L.) larvae from plankton samples collected from the Great South Bay and Coecles Harbor on Long Island, New York. We found that morphology is unreliable as the only means of identification for bivalve larvae in a mixed field sample, and a very high false positive rate of identification of M. mercenaria (100% of 71 larvae were misidentified). Morphological characteristics may be used to eliminate larvae from a field plankton sample, as the false negative rate for M. mercenaria was only 1.4% (n ¼ 140). To determine larval bivalve densities accurately, other techniques in addition to those based on morphological characteristics, such as the molecular technique used in this study, must be used.
Journal of Plankton Research, 2007
We report the application of a recently developed molecular method, single step nested multiplex PCR (SSNM-PCR) assay and microscopy to identify and investigate temporal patterns of bivalve larvae in a Danish estuary, Isefjord. All samples were collected during the SUSTAINEX program from June to November 2001. Using the molecular assay, larvae could be categorized into six groups: the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis, Ensis spp., species of the Myoidae superfamily (Mya spp.), the common cockle (Cardiidae family), members of the Abra and Macoma genera of the Tellinoidae superfamily and members of the surf clam genera, Spisula spp. A seventh group was composed of unknown larvae. Greater resolution was possible by microscopy, but only for relatively large and intact individuals (.150-200 mm). The molecular approach was capable of differentiating between larvae regardless of shell size. Where it was possible to directly compare identifications based on both methods, concordance was high for M. edulis, Macoma balthica/Abra alba and E. americanus, whereas identification of Myoidae spp. and Cardiids was less consistent. Over the course of the study, two patterns of larval occurrence were observed. Larvae from species known to exhibit a protracted annual spawning period (M. edulis, Myoidae spp., Mysella bidentata and Cardiids) were present in the water column throughout the sampling period, whereas larvae of Abra alba, Barnea candida, E. americanus, Macoma balthica, Musculus marmoratus Scrobicularia plana and Tapes pullastra appeared at clearly defined periods.
Marine Biology, 2005
A nested multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay has been developed that allows the discrimination between six bivalve larvae common to Danish coastal waters (Cerastoderma edule, Macoma balthica, Mytilus edulis, Spisula subtruncata, Ensis americanus and members of the order Myoida). This assay involves the simultaneous use of a pair of general universally targeted 18S rRNA gene primers, five specific 18S rRNA gene targeted oligonucleotide primers internal (nested) to the universal primer pair and one species-specific primer that is not nested (Mya). The specificity of each primer was evaluated in silico, empirically, and verified further by sequencing of amplification products from single larvae collected from plankton samples. Identification of individually isolated bivalve larvae from plankton samples was based on the size of the PCR product produced by the specific primers after visualisation by agarose gel electrophoresis. Preliminary studies indicated that this method was suitable for use with freshly collected and preserved larvae, and is therefore suitable for field application.
Aquaculture, 2005
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were generated against 2-day-old mussel larvae in an attempt to develop a rapid and rigorous method for the identification of mussel larvae in field plankton samples. Previously, we have shown that two of these mAbs recognised Galician Mytilus galloprovincialis obtained from monospecific cultures, but did not recognise the larvae of other bivalve species present in that area. To assess the possibility of using these mAbs in routine assays for measuring the abundance of mussel larvae in plankton, studies on cultured mussel larvae, at different stages of development, and tests on bivalve larvae from plankton samples were carried out. Initially, to see whether the two mAbs also recognise other mussel larval stages, they were tested against mussel larvae of different ages obtained from monospecific cultures. The results indicate that both antibodies stain all the stages tested, even 1-month-old postlarvae. In addition, we also demonstrate that these mAbs also recognise other forms of Mytilus. Both antibodies bind to M. galloprovincialis larvae from the Mediterranean Sea and M. edulis larvae. Finally, and more significantly, studies on field plankton samples were performed to confirm if both mAbs are really mussel-specific, and do not cross-react with larvae of any other bivalve species existing in the plankton. The results presented here clearly indicate that our two monoclonal antibodies specifically recognise the mussel larvae in field plankton samples from different geographical regions, but not the larvae of any other bivalve species. Thus, these monoclonal antibodies could be used for routine monitoring of mussel larvae in plankton samples from different sources. D
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 2020
State of the art of identification of eggs and larvae of freshwater fish in Brazil Estado da arte da identificação de ovos e larvas de peixes de água doce no Brasil
Acta Adriatica: International Journal of Marine Sciences, 2022
Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2007
Accurate and efficient identification to the species level of early larval stages has long been a problematic step in the study of marine invertebrates, due to the extremely small size of the larvae and their lack of diagnostic morphological characters. It is nonetheless, a prerequisite for any ecological study. As a consequence, a number of molecular approaches, mostly based on the PCR technique, have been developed over the last decade. We developed a method relying on specific rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for in situ molecular hybridization using whole larvae. A colorimetric reaction following the hybridization allows signal detection with a light microscope. A total of 9 probes have been developed, targeting the species that are major components of benthic communities in several European bays. The method can be applied to roughly sorted wild plankton samples, and some steps could be automated. It is relatively inexpensive to implement and does not require costly equipment or expensive staff training. The overall larval morphology is preserved, allowing visual inspection. The quantitative aspect of the approach is another asset. Field-based studies of larval distribution and behaviour are possible applications of the method, as large numbers of samples can be screened to meet the requirements of adequate spatial and temporal coverage. It is also relevant for routine monitoring of target species, such as species of commercial interest, bio-indicators or invasive species.
Folia Zoologica, 2002
A b s t r a c t. The larval period in fishes has several definitions, each one deviating slightly from the other. Small discrepancies in the definitions, especially concerning the end of the larval period, can create misunderstandings when applied in practice. I examine the different definitions of a larva, the larval period, including metamorphosis, and the juvenile period. Various criteria used to identify the transition from the larval to juvenile periods are contradictory and refer mostly to the length of the larval period. Ignorance of definitions used to identify the juvenile period has caused many larvae to be regarded as juveniles. I discuss the feasibility of various definitions and the nomenclature on the basis of character evaluation. The occurrence of larval morphological characters, i.e. larval fin fold, differentiation of fins, temporary organs, absence of scale cover, non-adult like body proportions and pigmentation, is examined and some features are compared in eleve...
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to produce species-speci¢c DNA markers (RAPDs) from two sibling cockle species and ¢ve other co-occurring intertidal bivalves. Ampli¢cation reactions with one single primer readily distinguished larvae and adults of Cerastoderma edule from larvae and adults of C. lamarcki, and from adults of Mya arenaria, Macoma balthica, Scrobicularia plana, Venerupis pulastra and Mytilus edulis. Random ampli¢ed polymorphic DNA (RAPD) is suggested as a simple and quick method to determine species identity in taxa that are di¤cult to identify on the basis of morphological characters alone, such as marine bivalve larvae.
PLoS ONE, 2013
Due to insufficient morphological diagnostic characters in larval fishes, it is easy to misidentify them and difficult to key to the genus or species level. The identification results from different laboratories are often inconsistent. This experiment aims to find out, by applying DNA barcoding, how inconsistent the identifications can be among larval fish taxonomists. One hundred morphotypes of larval fishes were chosen as test specimens. The fishes were collected with either larval fish nets or light traps in the northern, southern and northwestern waters of Taiwan. After their body lengths (SL) were measured and specimen photos were taken, all specimens were delivered, in turn, to five laboratories (A-E) in Taiwan to be identified independently. When all the results were collected, these specimens were then identified using COI barcoding. Out of a total of 100 specimens, 87 were identified to the family level, 79 to the genus level and 69 to the species level, based on the COI database currently available. The average accuracy rates of the five laboratories were quite low: 80.1% for the family level, 41.1% for the genus level, and 13.5% for the species level. If the results marked as ''unidentified'' were excluded from calculations, the rates went up to 75.4% and 43.7% for the genus and species levels, respectively. Thus, we suggest that larval fish identification should be more conservative; i.e., when in doubt, it is better to key only to the family and not to the genus or species level. As to the most misidentified families in our experiment, they were Sparidae, Scorpaenidae, Scombridae, Serranidae and Malacanthidae. On the other hand, Mene maculata and Microcanthus strigatus were all correctly identified to the species level because their larvae have distinct morphology. Nevertheless, barcoding remains one of the best methods to confirm species identification.
Journal of Shellfish Research, 2018
From the 1980s through 1995, scientists at numerous marine, coastal, estuarine, and freshwater laboratories spawned bivalves to provide larvae for use in identifying species based on larval hinge structures and gross shell morphometry. These larvae were preserved in 95% ethanol and stored in sample vials, many of which dried out over the years. Advantage was taken of 50 of 56 species from this collection (and two additional species that were not in the collection for a total of 52 species) to explore the use of optical techniques (polarized light and a full-wave compensation plate) to highlight birefringence patterns of larval shells to discriminate individual species. Representative images of various developmental stages of 77% (40/52) of the larval bivalve species in the collection were successfully imaged. Similarities across birefringence patterns were observed at the taxonomic ordinal and familial level. Molecular polymerase chain reaction techniques were used in an effort to sequence many of the dried-out specimens and they successfully identified 19% (10/52) of the larval bivalve species with matches in GenBank. Here it has been demonstrated that optical techniques are efficient for imaging dried-out larval bivalve shells for classification purposes and we present successful sequences of 10 species of bivalve larvae from the preserved collection.
2011
Project Hypotheses We hypothesized that differences in the distribution of adult mussels are the result of differences in the selection pressures on their larvae, such that the vertical distribution of larvae from the inner bay species (M. senhousia) facilitates bay retention, while that of the open-coast species (M. californianus) enhances alongshore dispersal. Project Goals and Objectives The preliminary research to be conducted was designed to address the following questions: (1) Can new imaging and particle analysis techniques (fluorescence in situ hybridization and a large-particle cell sorter-FISH-LPCS) be used to successfully isolate and distinguish among three mytilid species in field-collected plankton samples? (2) Do larvae from the three mytilid species display different vertical distribution patterns that may influence their horizontal transport? (3) Does vertical distribution change with tide, light or ontogenetic stage? Briefly describe project methodology (1) LAB-SPAWNED LARVAE. Adult M. californianus, M. galloprovincialis, and M. senhousia were collected and brought back to the lab where spawning was induced. After quantifying larval densities, test mixtures of known concentrations of mussel larvae were created and used to test the accuracy of the large-particle cell sorter to quantify samples containing mixed species.
Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2003
This paper describes a novel application of support vector machines and multiscale texture and color invariants to a problem in biological oceanography: the identification of 6 species of bivalve larvae. Our data consists of polarized color images of scallop and other bivalve larvae (between 2 and 17 days old) collected from the ocean by a shipboard optical imaging system of our design. Larvae of scallops, clams, and oysters are small (100 microns) with few distinguishing features when observed under standard light microscopy. However, the use of polarized light with a full wave retardation plate produces a vivid color, bi-refringence pattern. The patterns display very subtle differences between species, often not discernable to human observers. We show that a soft-margin support vector machine with Gaussian RBF kernel is a good discriminator on a feature set extracted from Gabor wavelet transforms and color distribution angles of each image. By constraining the Gabor center frequencies to be low, the resulting system can attain classification accuracy in excess of 90% for vertically oriented images, and in excess of 80% for randomly oriented images.
Copeia, 2000
We investigated the use of geometric morphological shape differences to differentiate laboratory-reared larval (4-22 days posthatch, Ͻ 10 mm SL) Morone chrysops, Morone saxatilis, and Morone chrysops & ؋ M. saxatilis ( hybrids. We also examined impacts of allometry on descriptions of individual shape. For validation of a shapebased taxonomic discrimination model, we used cellulose acetate electrophoresis to establish a ''known species'' test group of field-collected larvae based on banding patterns for the enzyme system esterase. Geometric shape was described with Cartesian coordinates of 16 anatomical landmarks located along the midsaggital outline of laboratory-reared (n ؍ 373) and field-collected (n ؍ 29) larvae. Coordinate data were reoriented and rescaled to uniform centroid size and analyzed as landmark displacements from a reference form. Discriminant function analysis resulted in 100% separation of M. chrysops and M. saxatilis larvae based on geometric shape. Discrimination success dropped to 87% when more variable data from hybrids were included in the discriminant function. Seventy percent and 87%, respectively, of field collected larvae (n ؍ 29) and a randomly selected laboratory subgroup (n ؍ 40) were correctly classified to taxon. Results suggest that taxonomic separation of early-stage larvae based on shape data is not affected by allometry but is sensitive to larval nutritional condition and handling. Landmark-based morphometrics may provide an improved, simple method of discrimination among species in sympatric populations of closely related larval fishes.
Aquaculture, 2009
The method currently used for accurate identification of mussel larvae is based on the study of morphological traits under an optical microscope, which is a tedious and time-consuming procedure. It also requires considerable taxonomic experience, because of the similarities in the larvae of different bivalves present in the plankton. The introduction of specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against mussel larvae, such as M22.8 and M36.5 mAbs developed by our group, may allow an easier and more specific identification. Handling conditions and sample preservation were optimized for using these antibodies in the monitoring of mussel larvae in the Galician rías. Bivalve larvae can be isolated very efficiently from plankton samples by centrifugation in sugar solution. Samples can be maintained at 4°C on the boat and during transport to the laboratory, and then preserved for longer periods at − 80°C or in liquid nitrogen until staining. In an attempt to minimize the time required for immunodetection, different incubation periods were tested, which showed that only 5 min of incubation with the primary monoclonal antibody and 60 min with the secondary antibodies are sufficient to stain over 98% of the larvae. Here, we show that the use of mAbs allows a rapid and specific recognition of mussel larvae, with clear advantages over the traditional method, particularly for large-scale field studies.
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 2012
The larvae of many coastal benthic invertebrates have complex life cycles beginning with a pelagic larval stage lasting from a few days to weeks. During development, larvae are passively transported by ocean currents that determine their fates (Thorson 1950; Scheltema 1986). Studies of invertebrate larval dispersal have been met by challenges associated with small sizes of individuals, high mortality, and patchiness over large spatial scales (Boicourt 1988; Garland 2000; Pineda et al. 2007). Particularly for bivalve larvae, it is difficult to perform species-specific field studies because of an inability to accurately identify early stage larvae (Garland 2000; Garland and Zimmer 2002; Gregg 2002). Because bivalve larvae exhibit species-specific behaviors in the field (Shanks and Brink 2006), one cannot accurately assess transport without identifying species. This is especially important when considering populations of commercially important species, as an understanding of larval transport is necessary to address management questions concerning species productivity and decline, shellfish enhancement through seeding, and habitat restoration (Gregg 2002). Once a bivalve larva begins shell mineralization (usually 20 h post-fertilization), most species proceed to a straight-hinge (veliger) stage followed by transformation to a more rounded, umbonate (pediveliger) stage after several days (Chanley and Andrews 1971). It is particularly difficult to distinguish species of straight-hinged larvae by morphological features alone, but as the larva develops, characteristic morphological changes can
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.