Academia.eduAcademia.edu

IS URBAN UNDERGROUND SPACE LUXURY?

The question whether space is luxury is understood to concern overground space. What happens then with underground space? I the course of human development, underground space has been used for all sorts of purposes yet to a limited degree and expanse. During the last centuries, the proliferation of infrastructure networks became predominant underground and renewed the interest in subterranean space, which has starter to gradually acquire more uses. The paper argues that the subterranean structures consist of most elements that comprise the over ground city, and bears all its characters, yet less broad structures. However, the sum of subterranean structures, especially those which are accessible and of dimensions rendering them passable to man, comprise a world from which nothing is missing yet under different than overground terms. Life, art, literature, cinema, myths and legends as well as symbolism are present, though with mixes, different than what one encounters overground. Even relevant legislation exists in most countries. The differentiality of the various elements reflects the difference between the underneath and the above. Today, as capital valorisation processes push to an exhaustive exploitation of land, as urban land becomes scarce, while at the same time the concept of compact cities is envisioned as a challenge, city planning may have to start foreseeing the third, Z, axis of cities, in order to avoid superficial and dangerous un-planned action in the future. The paper concludes by trying to investigate under what terms urban underground space could be conceived as a necessity, or luxury. It prompts for further research on the possibilities for a rational usage of underground space and for the establishment of a set of more detailed planning regulations that respond to the questions raised by rational scepticism.