Review of C. L. Seow, Job 1-21

Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2003

The Editorial Office thanks the following colleagues for reviewing ... Reviewers having provided comments on P5 articles ... Daniel Abramowicz Jean-Michel Achard Dwomoa Adu Rajiv Agarwal Eric Alamartine Paolo Altieri Kerstin Amann Michel Aparicio Angel Argiles Margret Arnadottir George Bakris Peter Barany Benoıt Barrou Carlo Basile Peter J. Blankestijn Vincent Brandenburg Philippe Brunet Paul Carmichael Jacques Chanard Anthony R. Clarkson Gerald Cohen Peter J. Conlon Mark E. Cooper Rosanna Coppo A. Cupisti Alejandro Darnell Simon J. Davies ...

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2004

2001

Science --Published dEbate responses for Laurance et al.,

2010

Below and/or attached are two reviews of the above manuscript. I am pleased to report that Reviewer #1 finds the manuscript acceptable for publication but Reviewer #2 still has some strong concerns. I have some sympathy with the view expressed in your covering letter, that Reviewer #2 may have a biased attitude. However, it would be inappropriate for me to entirely ignore their comments, so I propose to adopt the following approach. I offer you the opportunity to write a reply to the comments of Reviewer #2, and to revise your manuscript further. The revised manuscript will then be sent to an independent Adjudicator, who will make a decision based on this manuscript and on the full correspondence. I will not seek a further opinion from Reviewer #2. I hope this approach is acceptable to you. [ ] Sincerely,

2016

m olpharm.aspetjournals.org D ow nloaded from MOL #095224 2

Radiation research, 2004

We tend to agree with many of the positions expressed by Pierce in his optimistic views about modeling and his more general comments. Biologically based mathematical models necessarily are and will always be far from giving a true picture of all the details of the carcinogenic process, but they can be a useful tool to connect quantitatively various hypotheses about the rate-limiting processes with epidemiological and experimental data. They are indispensable to obtain scientifically based, more reliable extrapolations from large, directly observable risks to the area of small risks which need to be quantified for the rational protection of humans and their environment against low doses of ionizing radiation (and other carcinogens).

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 1996

The Editorial Office thanks the following colleagues for reviewing papers for the period of June 1st 1994 to June 30th 1995.

BRILL eBooks, 2018

This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the prevailing CC-BY-NC-ND License at the time of publication, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited.

Critical Survey, 2018

Editorial

HortFlora Research Spectrum, 2017

Volume 6, Issue 1 An t r t n NAAS Rating : 3.78