Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2010
AI
The study examines the challenges and transformations regarding gender equality (GE) in Swedish organizational management, highlighting the complexities faced by women and men. It reveals that while women's managerial presence is disrupting traditional masculine norms, their position is still perceived as deficient due to persistent gender biases. Male managers are beginning to recognize their privileges but often interpret GE movements as excessive or discriminatory towards men. This tension reveals a dual narrative where progress towards gender equality is accompanied by new challenges for women, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of gender dynamics in management.
British Journal of Management, 2008
2016
Despite attempts to broaden access to higher education in the UK through widening participation policies from the 1990s onwards and more recent national and local prioritising of gender equality in institutional strategic planning via initiatives such as the Athena SWAN charter, radical gender change in numerical and cultural terms is allusive. This paper proposes that universities, in the context of accelerated change, remain 'conservative' organisations with regards to working norms and career progression. Increasingly research and higher education institutions have multiple demands laid on them-demands for scientific excellence, demands for organisational innovation, the need to respond to student needs-and gender equality is but one amongst many competing demands that require action and reflection. It is important to understand how multiple demands can reinforce or undermine each other in terms of organisational activities and change. Drawing on empirical and action research in a UK higher education institution, this paper explores managerialism and concepts of excellence and meritocracy through a gender-lens. Excellence can be defined as: high mobility; excellent networks; high citations and; high levels of research funding. The quantitative measurement of performance through instruments like the Research Excellence Framework (REF) recognise and foreground particular kinds of activities at the expense of others. In addition to these aspects, the highly competitive environment in academia may exacerbate inequality as research shows that women are less likely to put themselves forward in competitive contexts and are less likely than men to consider themselves as 'excellent'. Masculine norms of career and working thrive in the environment of increasing competition and recurring research, teaching and administrative performance indicator measurements: women who adhere to masculine norms can succeed, but real change is sidestepped. The lack of meaningful structural change acts as a barrier to gender equality in the academy. The paper concludes by offering some examples and recommendations on how this issue can be addressed.
Ethnologia Europaea, 2004
His well known that universities are male dominated both in history as well as in the dominant discourses. As knowledge producing organizations universities also carries the heritage of defending the scientific ethos of meritocracy and objectivity, these arc rules that many researchers still are trained to believe in. This makes often studying of gender inequality in academia a difficult task since it not only reveals the gendered structures of academia but also violates the norms of science i mplying that science is socially biased. This article explores how gender inequality is produced within the discourse of equality at Swedish universities. The underlying assumption is that gender inequality on the level of the academic departments is produced within the broader discourses of gender, power, science and equality operating in everyday academic working lives and in society in general.
2000
This paper addresses a crucial question, namely how the practices involved in what is labeled research contribute to the reproduction of gender inequality. Through a discourse analysis of research articles on women's entrepreneurship, I show that, contrary to intentions, this research second-sexes women. I also show how this is achieved. Discussing the particular practices that bring this about, I discuss how this seemingly inevitable result may be avoided. The implications go beyond gender issues, however. They entail a challenge of the very basis of management research practices.
Introduction to Special Issue on Gender and Leadership and a Future Research Agenda, 2018
This study takes inspiration from recent events in the US election to investigate why women are not able to assume certain leadership roles. Through an examination of management textbooks, beginning in 1950 and continuing to 2012, the authors chart the socio-political and historical context upon which the management texts were written and tease out the ways that women have been socially constructed as a problem to be managed. The study explores how the problem with women arose and how it has been maintained in organizational settings. The authors explore the role scholars and theorists in management and organization studies and management history can play in unpacking this dilemma and advancing change. The study undertakes a feminist interrogation to understand the systematic ways that roles and identities for women have been structured to both describe women negatively, limit and exclude them, and why such structures are durable. Additionally, the article asserts that the subtle shift from women as problem (collective), to a woman manager (as individual, as exceptional) and women as either the same or different from men, serves to blind us to the possibility of female governance.
2004
This paper addresses a crucial question, namely how the practices involved in what is labeled research contribute to the reproduction of gender inequality. Through a discourse analysis of research articles on women's entrepreneurship, I show that, contrary to intentions, this research second-sexes women. I also show how this is achieved. Discussing the particular practices that bring this about, I discuss how this seemingly inevitable result may be avoided. The implications go beyond gender issues, however. They entail a challenge of the very basis of management research practices.
ssrn, 2022
Gender inequality in several social structures of society is a long-standing issue. A more prevalent problem is the imbalance in leadership between males, females, and other communities. However, the statistics show a positive trend toward equality over the past few years, as more organizations employ more women in leadership positions. There is more campaign toward equality in workplaces and breaking structures and cultures that necessitate disparities. Some causes of the disparity include stereotyping, workplace harassment, segregation, and existing organizational cultures and structures that promote a patriarchal system. The existing societal gender roles/essentialism and social constructionism can explain these causes. Nonetheless, organizations miss out on the benefits of being a gender-equal company and face the consequences of promoting an imbalanced workplace full of conflict and harassment. Bridging the gap of this social inequality requires promoting policies that empower women and offer them a chance to be in the limelight. By improving workplace gender balance, we move toward an equal society and break the illusions of patriarchy and gendered cultures.
Sexism in Danish Higher Education and Research: Understanding, Exploring, Acting, 2021
This book is the result of the hundreds of brave employees at Danish higher education institutions who dared to step forward, either with their names or with their stories about sexism and sexual harassment through the initiative concerning Sexism in Danish academia, which we started by launching a petition in early October 2020. As the initiator group—16 individuals from six different research institutions—we are forever grateful for their courage and solidarity with each other and with us. Their many voices and stories show the surprising pervasiveness of sexism, with its many facets and types. They reveal how sexism traps our human flourishing and constrains what we can become individually, collectively, institutionally, and as a society. This book is a revolutionary exposition of the many voices, the transformation from “I have suffered” to “We have suffered.” The awakening of the us is in itself a political action toward change, assuring that we won’t forget or hide away the suffering that gendered and sexual harassment courses this day today. We dedicate this book to the change that is necessary in our society and institutions and hope that we hereby provide some justice to all those who have suffered wrongs rooted in sexism. This book is structured in four parts. First, we introduce the nature and issues of sexism in the chapter “Understanding,” which provides information that will help readers understand what sexism is, how it operates, and how it is performed. Secondly, this is followed by the chapter “Exploring,” which presents a “methodological mix” including both qualitative and quantitative data to explore the multiple ways in which sexism operates. In the first part, we present an array of vignettes, developed from the accounts and testimonials submitted to our petition, which are divided into different categories of sexism. Each story is part of a category and presents questions that invite readers to work with the complexity of sexism. In the second part, we present our quantitative study—a survey questionnaire—which we sent out following our petition to capture the extent of sexism. The next chapter, “Acting,” includes practical knowledge and exercises for staff and managers to examine how they can approach local efforts to fight sexism, including tangible tips and tools for handling sexism in the workplace. Lastly, the book offers a collection of knowledge resources and references to learn more about the complexity and action possibilities to deal with sexism.
Acta Commercii, 2017
Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to highlight how women managers in Swedish higher education (HE) both support and resist policies about equal representation, and to discuss which factors influenced if, and how, these managers took on the role as change agents for gender equality. Design/methodology/approach -The paper draws on qualitative semi-structured interviews with 22 women in senior academic management positions (vice-chancellors, pro vice-chancellors, deans and pro deans) in ten Swedish HE institutions. Findings -The paper highlights how these women situated themselves in an academic context where gender relations were changing. They supported equal representation policies in their everyday managerial practice and also by accepting management positions that they were nominated and elected to on the basis of such policies. However, they also resisted these policies when they experienced a need to "protect" women from being exploited "in the name of gender equality".
British Journal of Management, 2011
This paper celebrates the progress that has been made in gender and management research over the last 25 years and outlines some current challenges faced. The British Journal of Management has disseminated many of the key debates, from empirical and theoretical work, that have helped to both frame and reflect developments in the fieldand this paper charts some of this diverse terrain. Challenges include current conceptualizations that gender issues have been 'solved' with a tendency towards 'gender denial' in understandings of work based disadvantage. Future areas of research are identified including the need to continue to monitor and publicize gender difference; to clarify and conceptualize emerging gendered hierarchies and new forms of gendered power; and to reveal hidden, gendered practices and processes currently concealed within norms, customs and values.
2003
Sweden is often described as one of the best countries in the world for women to live in. Despite this and despite a number of equal opportunity interventions within the area of higher education fr ...
2003
Focusing on the Nordic context, this article highlights complexities between gender equality discourse established at the societal level and discursive practice in organizations, particularly in relation to management, managing and managers. This research task is carried out by deconstructing a management text, and grounding the deconstruction in critical feminist literature. This analysis illustrates how managerial discourse is challenged and questioned by pro-egaliterian arguments in the Nordic context. However, it also demonstrates the pervasiveness of the gendered elements in managerial discourse, which relies on specific conceptions of parenthood where motherhood is constructed as problematic whereas fatherhood remains absent-and thus unproblematic. It is suggested that the 'Nordic case' provides a fruitful basis for similar studies in other societal contexts in Europe.
Texts on gender and organizations often start by referring to common knowledge or statistics showing an inferior position of women in relation to men. Women in general have lower wages, even within the same occupation and at the same level, experience more unemployment, take more responsibility for unpaid labour, are strongly underrepresented at higher positions in organizations, and have less autonomy and control over work and lower expectations of promotion (e.g. Chafetz, 1989; Nelson and Burke, 2000; Ely et al., 2003). There is massive empirical evidence on these issues and those arguing that there exists a gendered order (or patriarchal society), which gives many more options and privileges to men, particularly in working life, but also in life in general, have little difficulty in substantiating their case.
Journal of Praxis in Higher Education
Gender inequalities persist among Swedish academic staff, and gender balance is especially skewed toward men in the most prestigious academic career positions, such as professorships. In this article, the measures used in Swedish universities to promote gender equality among academic staff are investigated and related to theories of gender. The study is based on interview survey data on gender and diversity policies from 14 Swedish universities with an actor–structure categorization of gender equality (GE) measures used in Sweden universities since 1990. This first comprehensive study of GE policy among Swedish universities provides unique data on what policies universities have in place and rejects the notion that individual measures are predominantly used to fight gender inequality. Universities mostly use structural measures to ‘fix’ the organization, but from this approach follows that those measures are often gender neutral and soft, indicating a strong belief in gender-neutral...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.