Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
AI
This research paper analyzes the current state of drug use and policy in the United Kingdom, highlighting trends among different demographics, particularly youth, and the implications for public health and criminal justice. It provides a comprehensive overview of drug dependency rates, comparing them to historical data, and discusses the social and economic impacts of drug use, including statistical findings related to arrests and expenditures on drug enforcement.
HIV Medicine
Introduction: People who inject drugs are at high risk of blood-borne infections. We describe the epidemiology of HIV among people who inject drugs in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland (EW&NI) since 1981. Methods: National HIV surveillance data were used to describe trends in diagnoses (1981-2019), prevalence (1990-2019), and behaviours (1990-2019) among people who inject drugs aged ≥15 years in EW&NI. HIV care and treatment uptake were assessed among those attending in 2019. Results: Over the past four decades, the prevalence of HIV among people who inject drugs in EW&NI remained low (range: 0.64%-1.81%). Overall, 4978 people who inject drugs were diagnosed with HIV (3.2% of cases). Diagnoses peaked at 234 in 1987, decreasing to 78 in 2019; the majority were among white men born in the UK/Europe (90%), though the epidemic diversified over time. Late diagnosis (CD4 <350 cells/µl) was common (2010-2019: 52% [429/832]). Of those who last attended for HIV care in 2019, 97% (1503/1550) were receiving HIV treatment and 90% (1375/1520) had a suppressed viral load (<200 copies/ml). HIV testing uptake has steadily increased among people who inject drugs (32% since 1990). However, in 2019, 18% (246/1404) of those currently injecting reported never testing. The proportion of people currently injecting reporting sharing needles/syringes decreased from 1999 to 2012, before increasing to 20% (288/1426) in 2019, with sharing of any injecting equipment at 37% (523/1429). Conclusion: The HIV epidemic among people who inject drugs in EW&NI has remained relatively contained compared with in other countries, most likely because of the prompt implementation of an effective national harm reduction programme. However, risk behaviours and varied access to preventive interventions among people who inject drugs indicate the potential for HIV outbreaks.
AIDS, 2005
Objective: To describe trends in HIV prevalence among injecting drug users in England and Wales between 1990 and 2003. Methods: Analysis of surveillance data from voluntary unlinked anonymous crosssectional surveys collecting oral fluid samples and behavioural information from injecting drug users recruited from both drug agency (n ¼ 24 304) and community settings (n ¼ 3628). Results: HIV prevalence in England and Wales declined from 5.9% in 1990 to 0.6% in 1996 and then remained stable until 1999, after which it increased to 1.4% in 2003. Few HIV infections were detected among short-term injectors between 1994 and 1999, but in recent years prevalence among this group has increased. Other factors associated with higher odds of HIV infection were being recruited in London and from community settings, and ever having had a voluntary confidential HIV test. Incidence estimated through a force of infection model was 2.8% per annum among those injecting for less than a year in London between 1998 and 2003. Conclusions: These data suggest that incidence and prevalence of HIV may have increased, whereas other indicators suggest an increase in risk behaviour. It is critical that harm reduction measures are reinvigorated, and evolve in response to changes in drug use risk behaviours and policy.
1996
This document summarises key statistics from national and local sample surveys of the prevalence of illicit drug use in the UK over the three decades from 1964 to 1994. In order to facilitate proper comparison, information about the nature and findings of these surveys is systematically summarised in tables of figures. The text is primarily concerned with describing methodological issues and summarising the findings of the most relevant studies. The information provided by these surveys presents a “jigsaw puzzle picture” of illicit drug use in Britain from the 1960s to the 1990s - with some pieces of the picture being clear, some unclear, and some missing. However, consistent trends underlie many of the findings, making particular conclusions fairly hard to resist - for instance, that the prevalence of drug use has risen significantly over the three decades, and that there were few signs of a plateau stage being reached in the near future.
PsycEXTRA Dataset
The Research, Development and Statistics Directorate exists to improve policy making, decision taking and practice in support of the Home Office purpose and aims, to provide the public and Parliament with i n f o r mat io n necessar y for i n f o rmed debate and t o publish information for future use. Stat istical Bul let ins are p roduced by the Researc h , Development and Statistics Directorate. For further copies contact: p u b l i c a t i o n s . rd s @ h o m e o ff i c e . g s i . g o v. u k h t t p : / / w w w. h o m e o ff i c e . g o v. u k / rd s
The Politics of Drugs
During the New Labour years (1997-2010), significant redirection of drugs policy took place, especially in the area of treatment: new institutions and policies were developed under the guidance of the National Treatment Agency. However in 2010, when the Coalition (Conservative and Liberal Democrat) government was formed, with its goal to prioritise 'recovery', there were still an estimated 400,000 problematic heroin and crack cocaine users in the UK. The consensus then among drug treatment experts was that the priority should be to build on what had been achieved but develop better links between different health, social care and other services to support recovery. The new direction of policy towards recovery was accepted but the challenges had to be recognised: many of the people who were using drug services arrived at the door with multiple problems and needs. Often their drug use was linked to experiences of childhood abuse or adult trauma, to mental health problems, homelessness, family breakdown and other problems. 1 Under Coalition and Conservative administrations since, the emphasis in drug treatment policy has been on 'recovery' but the wider context has
2005
to improve policy making, decision taking and practice in support of the Home Office purpose and aims, to provide the public and Parliament with i n f o rmat ion necessar y for i n f o rmed debate and to publish information for future use. Sta t i st ica l Bu l le t ins are p roduced by the Researc h,
Addiction Research & Theory, 2013
Using Bayesian capture-recapture analysis, we estimated the number of current injecting drug users (IDUs) in Scotland in 2006 from the cross-counts of 5670 IDUs listed on four data-sources: social enquiry reports (901 IDUs listed), hospital records (953), drug treatment agencies (3504), and recent Hepatitis C virus (HCV) diagnoses (827 listed as IDU-risk). Further, we accessed exact numbers of opiate-related drugs-related deaths (DRDs) in 2006 and 2007 to improve estimation of Scotland's DRD rates per 100 current IDUs. Using all four data-sources, and model-averaging of standard hierarchical log-linear models to allow for pairwise interactions between data-sources and/or demographic classifications, Scotland had an estimated 31700 IDUs in 2006 (95% credible interval: 24900-38700); but 25000 IDUs (95% CI: 20700-35000) by excluding recent HCV diagnoses whose IDU-risk can refer to past injecting. Only in the younger age-group (15-34 years) were Scotland's opiate-related DRD rates significantly lower for females than males. Older males' opiaterelated DRD rate was 1.9 (1.24-2.40) per 100 current IDUs without or 1.3 (0.94-1.64) with inclusion of recent HCV diagnoses. If, indeed, Scotland had only 25000 current IDUs in 2006, with only 8200 of them aged 35þ years, the opiate-related DRD rate is higher among this older age group than has been appreciated hitherto. There is counter-balancing good news for the public health: the hitherto sharp increase in older current IDUs had stalled by 2006.
British Medical Journal, 2008
Objectives To examine the "Scottish effect"-namely, the growing divergence between mortality in Scotland and England that is not explained by national differences in levels of deprivation-and, more specifically, to examine the extent to which the Scottish effect is explained by cross national differences in the prevalence of problem drug use. Design Secondary analysis of cohort study (the DORIS study). Participants 1033 Scottish drug users recruited to the cohort study in 33 drug treatment facilities across Scotland in 2001-2 and followed up 33 months later in 2004-5. Results 38 deaths occurred in the cohort, giving a standardised mortality ratio for the cohort of 1244 (95% credible interval 876 to 1678). Only 22 of the 38 deaths in drug users were classified as drug related deaths. From estimates of the size of the problem drug using populations in both England and Scotland, the contribution of deaths in drug users to national death rates can be estimated: the attributable risk fraction for Scotland is 17.3% (12.3% to 22.8%) and that for England is 11.1% (7.8% to 14.8%). Excluding estimated numbers of deaths in drug users would bring down age standardised mortality at ages 15-54 years from 196 to 162 per 100 000 in Scotland and from 138 to 122 per 100 000 in England; 32.0% (22.3% to 43.0%) of the excess mortality in Scotland is due to drug use. Conclusion Although problem drug use is a low prevalence risk behaviour, it carries a high mortality; the standardised mortality ratio for Scottish drug users is 12 times as high as for the general population. The higher prevalence of problem drug use in Scotland than in England accounts for a third of Scotland's excess mortality over England. Successful public health efforts to reduce the prevalence of problem drug use in Scotland or deaths in Scottish drug users would have a dramatic impact on overall mortality in Scotland.
The Sociological Review, 2008
This is an early report of data from an on-going, repeated, cross-sectional study of a community sample of Glasgow injecting drug users. Although HIV was first detected among Glasgow's drug injectors in 1985, data from the first two years of our annual samples (1990 and 1991) indicate that HIV prevalence continues to be low in this population, in the order of 1 or 2 per cent. Possible reasons for this apparent continuing low prevalence are examined. It is suggested that substantial risk reduction – reductions in injection equipment-sharing, reductions in numbers of sharing partners and restrictions in social circles of sharing partners – may have been sufficient reasons, in conjunction with limited contributions to near-stabilisation from the disproportionate attrition of the numerator population through death and cessation of injecting.
Journal of Public Health, 2004
The incidence of new persons and repeat attenders presenting for treatment for problem drug misuse in the South West of England more than doubled from 1996-1997 to 2000-2001. During this time there was an increase in the number and severity of chronic cases, both in terms of the prevalence of heroin and crack-cocaine use and in the frequency of injecting and sharing injecting equipment. Growth in the availability of treatment, changes in notification practice and sub-regional variation make it difficult to be confident about real rates of increase, or age, gender and substance misuse changes, but the size of these changes mean they are unlikely to be purely artefactal.
2010
The Annual Report on drug-related deaths in the United Kingdom published by the national programme on Substance Abuse Deaths (np-SAD) is used by the UK Government, national and international agencies, academics, and commissioners and service providers as an indicator of the extent and nature of drug misuse, and makes a contribution towards the prevention of substance abuse problems. The Programme could not achieve its goals and objectives without the invaluable voluntary collaboration and cooperation of coroners and their officers across England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Guernsey, Jersey, and the Isle of Man. Scottish drug-related deaths data is provided by the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency. Additional data is provided by the Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency on drug-related poisonings from the General Mortality Register. The contributions from all are important as it enables the Programme to maintain a UKwide reporting and surveillance system. We thank them all for their active participation and support. The findings show an increase in deaths in 2009 reported directly to np-SAD by coroners from England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Islands when compared to the number reported in last year's report. Deaths in Scotland have remained stable. The np-SAD has an ongoing programme of visits to a representative sample of coroner areas to monitor the quality, accuracy and comprehensiveness of the data received on drug-related death. As in previous years, the statistics in this report are intended to inform authorities at the local, regional and national levels, as well as health professionals and the general public, about the serious consequences of drug abuse, especially polydrug use. This year's report provides a more detailed analysis for 'drug misuse' deaths for England and looks in particular at differences between age-groups, the mortality of drug users aged over 40, and polysubstance implication in death. The report also provides a number of indications of changes in patterns of drug abuse, trends over time, and emerging issues from our surveillance activities so that appropriate and timely action can be taken. The Programme would like to express their thanks to the Department of Health for its support for this very important programme.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.