Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1998, Fiscal Studies
In this paper, we present a new model of UK public finances which aims to shed light on recent problems of forecasting the PSBR. The main elements of public spending are treated as endogenous variables which rise in line with GDP over the medium term. Also, the cyclical response of public borrowing to rises in the level of economic activity is more muted when growth is export-led than when it is consumer-led. These two features go a long way towards explaining the rapid deterioration of public finances in the early 1990s and the slow pace of improvement since 1993.
2008
Under the Code for fiscal stability, the Government is required to publish estimates of fiscal aggregates adjusted for the effects of the economic cycle. This paper updates previous HM Treasury estimates of the effects of the economic cycle on the public finances. It finds little change from previous analysis published in 2003, concluding that HM Treasury's existing cyclical-adjustment coefficients should remain unchanged.
2008
Neither the current Labour government nor the previous Conservative one can look back over their respective terms of office as periods of great success in fiscal management. Both started by strengthening their underlying budget balances for three years after taking office, but both then allowed them to drift steadily back into the red. This meant that they were already borrowing significant amounts when the onset of recession required them to borrow more.
This paper analyses the public sector EU-15 countries, with emphasis on public expenditure where it analyses the trends in public expenditure EU-15 during the period from year 1995 until 2012. Public expenditures are measured at local and regional level (general government including social security funds) in relative proportion to the gross domestic product, in order to fully gauge the level of public expenditure. Classification of public expenditure for the EU-15 is made in accordance with the European System of Accounts (ESA-95) in order for data to be unified and thus adequate for research. This paper carries out studies to determine the average rate trend of public expenditure EU-15 in the reference period, and the causes of that particular trend. Public expenditures are classified by functional classification of government (COFOG), and consist of expenditure on general public services, social protection, education, culture, health, housing and community amenities, environmental protection, economic affairs, public order and safety, and defence. The aim of this work is to determine the trend of public spending in three observation periods. The first period is the total time series, from 1995 until 2012. Another time series includes the period up to the beginning of economic crisis, i.e. the period from 1995-2007, in order to determine the trend of public spending before the economic crisis. Last observation period includes time-series from year 2008 until 2012 in order to show the impact of the global economic crisis on public expenditure of the EU-15 countries, and the change in average rate dynamics. The analysis of the public expenditure trend in three different time periods has shown numerical impact of the crisis and the intensity of disturbance of public finances in the EU-15 countries. Expenditure on social protection, education, health, economic affairs and general public services has shown anti-cyclical nature considering the global economic crisis (2008-2012). This global economic crisis has shown the true significance of balanced and stable public finances that do not rely entirely on Keynesian principles. This is because countries that strived to reduce public expenditures before 2008 were proved resilient to the impact of the crisis and had a higher number of fiscal instruments available to mitigate the effects of the crisis.
2006
Studying spending over time requires reliable data. It is not clear that such data exist in the UK, however. The two published sources of functional spending numbers-the Office for National Statistics's 'blue book' and Her Majesty's Treasury's Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses (PESA)-rely on estimates of past spending, using a link year method, rather than recalculating actual spending figures when functional definitions change. We assess the various measures of spending in the UK. Specifically, we do two things. First, we present a new, third, set of spending numbers applying temporally consistent functional definitions to PESA microdata. Second, we compare the three measures. Our analyses indicate that the Office for National Statistics and PESA data differ quite markedly, especially for certain functions, i.e. in some cases the two measures imply completely different histories. The differences between the original PESA data and our new measures are less pronounced on average, though significant differences are evident, especially year by year.
Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2010
Over the first eleven years of Labour government, from 1997 to the eve of the financial crisis in 2007, the UK public finances followed a remarkably similar pattern to the first eleven years of the previous Conservative government, from 1979 to 1989. The first four saw the public sector move from deficit to surplus, while the following seven saw a move back into the red. By 2007 Labour had reduced public sector borrowing slightly below the level it inherited from the Conservatives. And more of that borrowing was being used to finance investment rather than the day-to-day running costs of the public sector. Labour had also reduced public sector debt below the level it had inherited. As a result the 'golden rule' and 'sustainable investment rule' that Gordon Brown had committed himself to on becoming Chancellor in 1997 were both met over the economic cycle that he eventually decided had run from 1997-98 to 2006-07.
2014
The purpose of this contribution is to look into the fiscal and debt policies in the UK and also discuss the future prospects of them. In doing so we begin with a discussion of the sustainability of deficits and debt, along with what precisely sustainability is, followed by a focused discussion of issues that relate to debt and growth, which in its turn requires a comprehensive analysis of the inter-temporal budget constraint thesis. Two further, relevant and important issues are subsequently addressed. These are, first, the relationship between the inter-temporal budget constraint thesis and sustainability, and, second, its consistency with household behaviour. The sustainability of deficits and 'functional finance', structural budgets and the impossibility of balanced structural budget are then discussed. Finally, the future of UK fiscal policy is addressed before we summarise and conclude.
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012
In this paper, we present a disaggregated framework for the analysis of past and projected structural developments in the most relevant revenue and expenditure categories and the fiscal balance. The framework, in particular, distinguishes between the effects of discretionary fiscal policy and of macroeconomic and other developments and is sufficiently standardised to be used in multi-country studies. Here, it is applied to Belgium, Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Portugal over the period 1998 to 2004. During this period the structural primary balance ratio clearly worsened in all countries except Finland. In Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands, both revenue and expenditure contributed to the deterioration of the structural primary balance. In Germany the large deterioration in revenue was partially offset by the decline in the structural primary expenditure ratio, while the opposite was true for Portugal. The analysis highlights the various factors that contributed to these developments.
2019
This thesis investigates the economic effects of government spending in the UK, examining if the size of spend and what the government buys play a role in the reported effects. This is done by examining the disaggregated effects of aggregated and disaggregated government spending at sectoral, industry and firm level. The first original contribution extends the simple income and expenditure model to highlight the importance of appropriately accounting for imports in sectoral government spending. The second contribution investigates the output and price effects of industry-specific government spending using a newly constructed measure of industry-specific government demand. The final contribution provides micro-level evidence by mapping firm-level central government expenditure to firms' financial accounts to report firm-level employment and wage effects of government demand. The general conclusion reached by the thesis is that not only is what the government buys important, but t...
This paper provides a model-based account of the forces shaping the dynamics of government spending in the industrialized democracies over the past few decades. The principle argument is that both short-term and long-term forces have been at work in the evolution of government spending in these countries. Emphasized here is the important role that the prevailing center of political gravity within the polity as well as the constraints that recent movements toward the integration of national capital markets into the international economic system have played in bringing about changes in government spending levels. Incorporated in the model are the hypothesized effects, in both the short and long run, of a set of cointegrated independent variables, as well as a set of other terms with impacts that are likely to be short run. The hypotheses surrounding this formulation are systematically tested and then a more encompassing model that includes the effects of domestic politics and international economic conditions is then presented and evaluated.
Metroeconomica, 1981
Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2012
The evolving response of the UK fiscal authorities to the financial crisis and recession are briefly outlined with a focus on the fiscal austerity programme introduced by the incoming Coalition government during 2010. The reasoning for that programme are critically examined and largely dismissed. It is argued that the drive for major cuts in public expenditure comes from seeking to achieve a balanced structural budget and the reductions in estimated potential output. The significance of the latter are discussed. The paper is completed by a brief consideration of alternatives.
IMF Staff Position Note, 2009
This paper characterises the time series properties of debt:GDP ratios in ten EU countries over the period 1982-2009. It establishes that shocks to debt ratios persist and measures the size and source of the permanent effects of shocks as they evolve over time. The analysis shows that debt dynamics in the EU10 are complicated, involving important inter-country interactions and protracted adjustment periods of the order of ten years. We find evidence of asymmetries in the effects of different forms of 'fiscal consolidation', with unanticipated reductions in government spending having a more permanent effect than unanticipated increases in government revenue. Unanticipated business cycle fluctuations also have important long-term effects on the ratio.
Journal of Finance and Management in the Public …, 2011
After the 2008 financial crisis, recession and subsequent collapse in government revenues, the UK's public deficit reached levels not seen since the Second World War. It had to deal with gearing by borrowing one pound for every four it spent. Before the 2010 election, all of the major parties agreed that tackling the deficit was a priority, and that spending reductions would play a major part. However, they did not agree over the timing and depth of cuts.
Fiscal Studies, 2008
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Central Bank (ECB). Thanks are due to J. Marín, L. Schuknecht and an anonymous referee of the ECB Working Papers Series for useful and constructive comments, to J. Paredes and M. Rodríguez-Vives for helping us with some data, and to H. James for editorial suggestions. Pérez acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education under projects SEC 2003-04028/C and SEJ 2006-04803 in an early stage of the paper, when he was affiliated with the University Pablo de Olavide (Seville, Spain).
2010
In this paper we investigate, by means of a century of UK data, the possibility of improving the government’s fiscal position by cutting expenditure. The period before the second world war provides examples of genuine ‘fiscal consolidations’, that is, episodes when government spending actually fell in money terms. These periods are contrasted with fiscal expansions. Spending figures are shown
1991
Fiscal deficits have been at the forefront of macroeconomic adjustment in the 1980s, both in developing and developed countries. Fiscal deficits were blamed in good part for the assortment of ills that beset developing countries in the 1980s: over-indebtedness leading to the debt crisis beginning in 1982, high inflation, and poor investment and growth performance. This paper will examine the evidence for the macroeconomic effects of fiscal deficits, using the results of a set of ten case studies done for the Bank research project,"The Macroeconomics of Public Sector Deficits."The ten cases were Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Morocco, Mexico, Pakistan, Thailand and Zimbabwe. The authors first present a summary of the stylized facts on fiscal adjustment. Then the results are presented of the decomposition of the deficit in the case studies. The results of the case studies are then used to relate deficits to macro economic imbalances: first by analyzin...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.