Gender Differences in Conversation Topics, 1922-1990
Katherine Bischoping1993, Sex Roles
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
Gender differences in conversation topics were first systematically studied in 1922 by Henry Moore, who theorized that the gender differences in topic choice he observed in a field observation study would persist over time, as they were manifestations of men's and women's "original natures. "In this paper, I report a 1990 replication of Moore's study, in which similar but smaller gender differences in topic choice are found. In order to explore further the apparent trend toward smaller gender differences, reports of quantitative observation studies conducted between 1922 and 1990 are examined. Other explanations besides change over time--such as variations in conversation setting and audience, target populations, and researcher's intentions---may account for the decline in gender differences in topic choice. Social influences are seen more clearly in the discourse about gender differences in conversation than in gender differences in conversation topics themselves.
Related papers
Males' and females' conversational behavior in cross-sex dyads: From gender differences to gender similarities
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1992
We investigated gender differences in conversational behavior in an experimental setting. Twenty men and 20 women were randomly paired in 20 dyads and were asked to discuss a given topic. We examined the transcripts through a varied range of behavioral variables. First we analyzed the sequential ordering of utterances in order to establish the way male and female speakers take the floor and get involved in the sequence and topic structuring of dialogues. Second we coded the male and female utterances according to the language functions they expressed. Contrary to what has often been claimed, it was found that males' and females' conversational behavior betrays more similarities than differences. The discrepancies between these findings and those of previous studies are discussed relative to methodological and situational differences across studies
Making Gender Relevant: Conversation Analysis and Gender Categories in Interaction
Discourse & Society, 2001
gender and language from a feminist perspective. In so doing, we engage in the recent series of exchanges about conversation analysis (CA) and other strands of discourse analysis that have been published in Discourse & Society. We consider talk from two sets of discourse data, focusing on participants' orientation to gender categories as they crop up in the interactions. We suggest that a CA approach produces a rich understanding of the links between discourse and gender. However, we are critical of several, often unexamined aspects and conundrums of conversation analytic methodology. First, we consider the extent to which the 'analytic stances' of feminism and conversation analysis are compatible. Second, we question whether, as Schegloff (1997) suggests, it is fruitful to rely on descriptions of and orientations to gender solely in participants' terms, as well as problematizing the notion of 'orienting to gender' itself. Finally, while we propose CA is a useful tool for making claims about the relevance of gender in conversational interaction, and that such claims are grounded in speakers' orientations, we suggest that culture and common-sense knowledge, of both members and analysts, are largely unacknowledged and unexplicated resources in CA.
Gender and Conversational Interaction
2011
This collection is composed of ten essays which explore connections between gender and interactional language usage and point to the importance of viewing these connections within a larger study of sociolinguistics. Tannen states in her introduction that the goal of this text, and hopefully of the further research it will stimulate, is to "point the way for a future generation of studies that will be based on [a] more sophisticated understanding of how language works in conversational interaction" and to "broaden and deepen our understanding of gender, language, and of the interaction between them"(p. 11). Tannen and her fellow authors are ultimately successful in reaching this goal because their studies take into account the often complex relationship between gender and language. Unlike less sophisticated studies which oversimplify the effects of gender on language, these studies reveal that while gender is itself an important variable, other variables such as age, personality, environment, etc., may alter gender's effect on language usage. The collection of essays is divided into four major sections: (1)TalkingAmong Friends,
Applying findings and creating impact from conversation analytic studies of gender and communication
Studies of workplaces frequently focus on gender, investigating and challenging inequality. In that many studies start with 'gender' as a taken-for-granted category, measuring gender differences in organizational life, or interviewing participants to elicit accounts of their employment experiences, they exaggerate and even create stereotypical 'common knowledge' about gender. In contrast, this paper illustrates a conversation analytic approach which can show if, when, and how, gender becomes consequentially relevant within any given communicative encounter. Drawing on a large corpus of institutional interaction, the paper demonstrates two things: that (1) robust claims about the gendering of social life can be made once those claims are grounded in what people actually do; and (2) systematic patterns in people's endogenous orientations to gender can be found in communication. Finally, the paper showcases a real-world application of conversation analytic work, demonstrating the impact and relevance of such research programmes for understanding everyday gendered social life.
Women and Men in Online Discussion: Are There Differences in Their Communication?
2001
This paper describes two studies involving men and women who participated in online discussions in a Web-based graduate course. The purpose of both studies was to examine the frequency and types of response these students made during the course chats and threaded discussions. The first study took place at the end of the course in a two-week period. Students were divided into two small groups: one group discussed the assigned topic via chat, while the other group discussed the same topic via threaded discussion. The following week, these groups switched discussion formats to discuss a second topic. Results of the first study indicate that both chats and threaded discussion (the primary focus of the original study) were valued and had utility. However, an unanticipated result indicated a variation in the number and type of statements made with one of the small groups versus the other. It was found that the majority-female group made more frequent statements than the majority-male group. This finding was contrary to the review of research in regard to two points: (1) results and discussion that indicate online discussion is an equalizer between men and women and (2) results that indicate females were less involved. Other discussions of students using both online formats at various points within the same course and semester were examined. Results of the second study indicate that there were some differences in the types of statements, but the amount of statements made by both genders on average was equivalent within mixedgender, large group discussions in the sampled four weeks. The findings of this second study confirmed studies that indicate gender equity,in computermediated communication. However, the initial study's results are still viable. It is possible that when in same gender groups, the genders use typical communication styles in discussion and when in mixed gender groups, the discussions are equivalent in number of statements for both genders. Additional research is necessary into this issue of gender and online discussion. (Contains 28 references.
Gender and affiliation differences in topic selection in U.S. congressional speeches
ExELL
The aim of this paper was to study gender differences in topic choice selection using the corpus of speeches given in the 113th United States Congress. We also looked at whether there are topic choice selection differences with respect to party affiliation and chamber, and finally, whether conversational topics chosen by male and female politicians correlate with any other category we measured in our corpus. The corpus was composed of 672 speeches by the female and 2,983 speeches by the male politicians. The speech transcripts were downloaded from the official repository Thomas and analyzed using the text analysis software Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) to identify the use of vocabulary related to seven conversational topics recorded by LIWC. The data was analyzed both quantitatively, using statistical analysis, and qualitatively, to determine if there are significant gender differences in speech topic selection. The analyses showed that there are overall gender and affili...
The Differences in Linguistic Forms Used by Men and Women
European Proceedings of Educational Sciences
This study was conducted to find the differences in linguistic forms, tag questions, preferred conversation topics, and polite linguistic forms used by men and women. The quantitative method was employed using descriptive statistics, where data were collected through online questionnaires. A set of questionnaires was designed to gain primary data from the respondents about the differences in linguistic forms, tag questions, preferred topics of conversation, and polite linguistic forms used by men and women. SPSS software was used to analyse data, and Cronbach's Alpha was used to check the reliability and validity of the questionnaire in each item. The findings show that women respondents applied more tag questions than men, and the most preferred conversation topics by men were current issues. Meanwhile, women love to talk about themselves, their feelings, their homes, and family. This study also found that most respondents disagreed that men are more polite than women. This evidently signifies that women demonstrate higher maturity and courtesy levels in conversational behaviour.
Gender differences in discourse
The Nature of Gender Differences at Discourse Level
Gender differences in discouse have been a subject of discussion for long. This paper analyzes biological and sociological aspects of gender differences and their influence in discourse.
Stereotyped Perceptions of Gender Differences in Male-Female Communication -re-visiting the stereotype of the female chatterbox and the silent man
If humankind had listened to Plato's advice and had tried to lay the foundations of the ideal state, in which women would have had the same equality of status as men and where sex wouldn't have been a criterion for discrimination, I wouldn't be presenting this paper today.
Conversational Interruptions-Analyzing Language, Gender and Divergence in Male Female Communication
Research Issues in Social Sciences, 2018
The use of language may influence the society both in terms of what is said by the people and about the people. Research in language and gender considers how language impacts upon society. The present study examines most influential theories regarding gender discrimination and compares interruptions in three types of pairs: male to male conversation (MM), female to female conversation (FF) and male to female in mixed sex conversation (MF). Three types of conversation samples were taken from Radio, TV and natural conversations. The multimedia annotator ELAN was used to transcribe and analyze the data. The results indicate that males interrupt more than females. The greater number of interruptions on the part of males has been attributed to male dominancy in conversation. This study also reveals that males interrupt more in male to female (in mixed sex) conversation as compared to male to male conversation. It asserts that in order to take hold of conversational floor, the male interlocutors try to take control of conversation by interruptions.
Gender Differences in Communication
Language and communication are considered acquired behaviours that develop through a combination of nature and nurture, genetic predisposition and environmental stimulation. Human beings have different styles while communicating with one other. Style depends on a number of things such as where we are from, how and where we are brought up, our educational background, age, and gender. In recent years, communication styles of men and women have been studied scientifically. Linguists have documented these perceived differences. The primary purpose of these intensive investigations is not to determine which communicative style is best or to motivate others to change completely, but to identify differences for the purpose of understanding and adaptation.
The Gender Communication Gap in Online Threaded Discussions
Advanced Applications and Developments
Threaded discussions are one of the central tools of online education. These tools enhance student learning and compensate for the lack of social interaction. This study examines whether these social interactions are affected by some typical gender related conversational behaviors, despite the fact that these threaded discussion are designed to operate in a seemingly gender neutral online environment. That men and women communicate differently in open conversation due to their different respective social objectives in communication is at the core of sociolinguistic theory. A direct result of these differences is a tendency toward same-gender oral conversations. To some extent, according to sociolinguists, cross-gender communication resembles cross cultural conversations. This study analyzes threaded discussions in online courses through the lens of sociolinguistic theory, and conjectures that these gender differences should be reflected in mild gender segregation in the threaded dis...
Differences in Language Conversation Use by Gender
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sains dan Humaniora
The main thing that affects language is Gender, it can affect the choice of words used. Then the language used by women is different from the language used by men. Those state that the choices of words, vocabulary, or sentences of language conversation through gender are different. This study conducted to analyze what happened or was experienced by certain groups which focused on the differences in the use of spoken language that were studied by gender. There are no participants in this research because this research use library research which is based on the literature review to analyze the data. This research uses descriptive qualitative. Analyzing and collecting data conducted by compiling or clarifying and interpreting. Data were collected through analyzing and reviewing sources in the form of books and articles discussing the topic then analyze the data in order to draw the conclusion. The result of study found that the language differences exist because of the paradigm social ...
Are Cross-Gender Conversations in Threaded Discussions Reminiscent of Communicating Across Cultural Boundaries?
International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 2007
At the core of sociolinguistic theory is the recognition that men and women when engaging in an open conversation communicate differently because of their different respective social objectives in communication. Oral conversations are, according to sociolinguists, akin to cross cultural conversations and hence the tendency toward same-gender conversations. Extrapolating to the realm of threaded discussions in online courses, these gender differences, it is hypothesized, should translate into mild gender segregation in the threaded discussions as well as men showing a greater proclivity to dominate the discussion. Data from 233 students in 27 courses support these hypotheses and allow a significant identification of the gender of the student based on whom they reference in the threaded discussion and the way they reference others. Implications on managing threaded discussions are discussed.
Interrelationships between Gender and Communication
Monograph, 1987
Every day, observations and predictions are made about people's gender on the basis of their communicative behaviors and the roles individuals play in their culture. Although interest in the relationship between biological sex and communication may be traced to the beginning of this century, much of the research on gender and communication has been produced over the past 15 years. Examining the history of gender and communication reveals how these topics are related. Communication is related to gender because communication identifies roles and encourages or discourages the internalizing of predispositions that relate to masculinity and femininity. Gender also relates to communication because it influences the specific use of verbal and nonverbal codes, languages of the masculine and feminine subcultures. Two major problems account for the difficulty in effective and appropriate communication across these subcultures: (1) it is assumed that gender and sex are synonyms; and (2) perceptions of behavior are often confused with actual behavior. The dilemmas in this area can be solved if people are willing to separate their perceptions of themselves or of others from the behaviors that they or others exhibit, and if gender and sex are viewed as distinctive constructs. Sex refers to biological differences between people; gender refers to internalized predispositions about masculine and feminine roles. (Twenty-two references are attached.) (MM) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
Have gender preferences and communication patterns changed?
This chapter shows that despite their preferences, many patients do not have a female general practitioner (GP). Preferences for female GPs are not fulfilled for one-third of female and two-thirds of male patients. The reason is that the higher number of female medical students has not led to enough practising female GPs yet. Those patients that have a preference for a female GP are more often female and younger. Furthermore, communication patterns have become more pragmatic. Nowadays, both male and female GPs talk less with their patients, express less empathy and concern, and talk less about biomedical and psychosocial issues than in 1987. Nevertheless, female GPs still talk more with patients than their male colleagues do. Compared with male GPs, they give more information, especially about biomedical issues. They also look more at their patients and are more affective. Communication patterns are not related to the patient's gender.
Speaker sex and perceived apportionment of talk
Applied psycholinguistics, 1990
It is a widely held belief that women talk more than men; but experimental evidence has suggested that this belief is mistaken. The present study investigated whether listener bias contributes to this mistake. Dialogues were recorded in mixed-sex and single-sex versions, and male and female listeners judged the proportions of talk contributed to the dialogues by each participant. Female contributions to mixed-sex dialogues were rated as greater than male contributions by both male and female listeners. Female contributions were more likely to be overestimated when they were speaking a dialogue part perceived as probably female than when they were speaking a dialogue part perceived as probably male. It is suggested that the misestimates are due to a complex of factors that may involve both perceptual effects such as misjudgment of rates of speech and sociological effects such as attitudes to social roles and perception of power relations.
Gender Differences in Communication : A Task-Oriented Corpus Analysis
2021
The current study explored the usage of various categories of words within the Montclair Map Task Corpus (MMTC) to determine if any relationships between the use of a certain category of words and task performance existed. The MMTC utilized a collaborative map task to explore the relationship between various patterns of communication styles and task performance. The current study built upon those goals by engaging in an in-depth analysis of the category of words utilized within the corpus. Based on the prior research on gender differences, it was hypothesized that category word usage would vary across different pair sex (male, female, mixed), and the relationship between their usage and partner performance would also vary. Based on the demand characteristics of the map task, certain categories such as direction and figure were expected to predict partner performance. No significant variations within the category usage across different pair sex were found, although the category types...
GENDER AND STYLES OF COMMUNICATIVE BEHAVIOURS Gender and styles of communicative behaviours
2007
The new concept in masculinity and femininity research began in 1974. The early 1970’s view of gender role orientation held that masculinity and femininity were at opposite ends of the same continuum. S. L. B e m (1974) challenged this concept by suggesting that masculinity and femininity were actually separate continuums, allowing individuals to endorse both characteristics. As mentioned above, gender schema theory of S. L. B e m (1974, 1981) represents a variation of the traditional bipolar model of masculinityfemininity. According to this theory sex-typed, gender-schematic men and women have developed a strong role indentification that has led them to acquire and display the diverse traits, attitudes and behaviours expected of their gender according to their’s society expectations. Moreover, gender serves as an organizing principle for sex-typed individuals that they use in processing information about themselves and the external world. Non-sextyped men and women, described as ge...
Related topics
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.