Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1998, Holocaust and Genocide Studies
Holocaust-knowledge surveys attracted considerable public attention in 1993, when media reports stated that 22% of the American public appeared to deny the existence of the Holocaust. Once this disturbing result was explained by question-wording experiments (experiments that exposed difficulties with the wording of the questions), public-opinion researchers abandoned discussion of Holocaust-knowledge surveys. In retrospect, the discourse about these surveys appears to have been limited, overlooking critical assumptions about the methodologies and theoretical bases of Holocaust-knowledge surveys. In this paper, assumptions about the primacy of question-wording studies, the exclusion of emotions from definitions of knowledge, and the omission of critical-thinking skills from these definitions are identified with data from a multi-method study of Holocaust knowledge. The paper employs theoretical perspectives in Holocaust and genocide studies to search for alternative methods of conceptualizing and measuring knowledge, and to illustrate how methods and meaning could be better integrated.
Contemporary Jewry, 1996
The effects of generation, eduation, ethnicity, and gender on Holocaust knowledge are explored, using data from a United States national survey, a university student survey and qualitatfve interviews with university students. Knowledge levels are greatest among more educated respondents, respondents whose political corn mg of age was during the Holocaust, and among Jewish respondents. Results for gender are sample-specific. Indepth interviews, which complement survey data, indicate that social psychological processes of identification with Holocaust victims influence knowledge and underlie demographic effects. Thus, public knowledge about the Holocaust is not determined statically by individuals' social structural characteristics. Rather, public knowledge is flexible and could be enhanced by Holocm~t education that emphasizes identification. Implications of the results for theories linking generation to knowledge and for methodological issues m sample design are identified As concern about Holocaust denial and distortion mounts , recent studies have attempted to assess the level of Holocaust knowledge various groups possess (Golub and Cohen 1993;. This study examines Holocaust knowledge with the goal ofdeterminm~ whether, and how, various social factors influence it. To do so, I use ,ht~ flora a United States national sample, a University of Michigan student sample, and qualitative, in-depth interviews with a student sample to study the relation.~h'm of Holocaust knowledge to four social influences: generation, education, ethnicity, and gender.
Prospects, 2010
This article examines the responses of some 1,500 Canadians to a public opinion survey on knowledge of the Holocaust, awareness of genocide, and attitudes towards discrimination and diversity. Based on one of the most detailed surveys conducted to date on Holocaust knowledge, the study found strong correlations between greater reported Holocaust knowledge and concern over genocide, as well as greater recognition of anti-Semitism as a societal problem. Greater reported Holocaust knowledge did not, however, correlate consistently with greater openness towards selected dimensions of diversity. This counterintuitive phenomenon can likely be attributed to what respondents have learned about diversity and the limits of the effect of Holocaust education in this regard. Hence, further research is required on the relationship between the two. Finally, going forward, a case is made for a global assessment of levels of Holocaust knowledge.
Philosophy Study, 2017
, the Israeli Ministry of Education declared that the matriculation exam in history would no longer include the Holocaust, and instead students would be required to write a research paper. Following this decision, we wished to test the level of knowledge concerning the Holocaust among undergraduate students (excluding those who study contemporary history, which includes Holocaust studies). For this purpose, 145 participants were sampled, students at four Israeli academic institutions: two universities and two colleges. The research question referred to remembering information about the Holocaust and the study took into account students' different personal, family, and academic background (having participated in the journey to Poland or not, having relatives who had died or survived the Holocaust, being religious or secular). The knowledge survey refers to terms from four areas: people, historical events during the Holocaust era, organizations that operated in that period, and places and methods of killing. In general, the level of knowledge was found to be very low (general knowledge score: 42.6 of 100). No significant differences were found in scores by religion or participation in the journey to Poland, aside from knowledge about places and methods of killing, where we found a significant difference between those who participated in the journey to Poland and those who did not. In addition, no significant differences were found between participants whose relatives had died in or had survived the Holocaust, or by either the number of years since high school graduation or gender. From the respondents' answers, it appears that high school studies play an essential role as the main perceived source of knowledge (90.4% referred to school as a main or additional knowledge source). When asked about the new exam format, the majority (52.1%) replied that they would prefer writing a research paper to taking an exam. The low level of knowledge that we found raises practical questions: Are the schools teaching correctly? Should the study program be reviewed? Are we providing the right highlights? What is the contribution of the journey to Poland if 60% of the participants are not familiar, for example, with Mordechai Anielewicz? What can be done to improve the situation? Will the decision to exclude Holocaust topics from the high school finals in history and to require students to write a research paper, improve the situation? What is the future of remembrance in a generation that will have no Holocaust survivors to tell their personal story? It is necessary to check the importance of the school as a primary source of knowledge and how to improve the study methods so that the knowledge will be preserved. Perhaps the informal teaching that includes the journey to Poland plays an important role and should be used more often. Furthermore, despite students' support of the reform and the conception that writing a research paper is better than taking an exam about the Holocaust, there is a need to check what is included in this research paper and whether writing it on a specific subject connected to
Seventy years have passed since the Holocaust, but this cataclysmic event continues to reverberate in the present. In this research, we examine attributions about the causes of the Holocaust and the influence of such attributions on intergroup relations. Three representative surveys were conducted among Germans, Poles, and Israeli Jews to examine inter-and intragroup variations in attributions for the Holocaust and how these attributions influence intergroup attitudes. Results indicated that Germans made more external than internal attributions and were especially low in attributing an evil essence to their ancestors. Israelis and Poles mainly endorsed the obedient essence attribution and were lowest on attribution to coercion. These attributions, however, were related to attitudes towards contemporary Germany primarily among Israeli Jews. The more they endorsed situationist explanations, and the less they endorsed the evil essence explanation, the more 1 0162-895X bs_bs_banner positive their attitude to Germany. Among Germans, attributions were related to a higher motivation for historical closure, except for the obedience attribution that was related to low desire for closure. Israelis exhibited a low desire for historical closure especially when attribution for evil essence was high. These findings suggest that lay perceptions of history are essential to understanding contemporary intergroup processes.
2011
Review of the Albright-Cohen Report for the U.S. Institute of Peace and its critics. The article suggests intellectual strategies for sharpening and advancing the fundamental ideas and conclusions in the Albright-Cohen study. The article provides a review from novel perspectives of the Holocaust and stresses a better understanding of the role of emotion and sentiment in promoting or constraining genocidal
Prospects, 2010
This article explores questions of the politics of knowledge and epistemology in relation to Holocaust education. It argues that, since knowledge is not neutral, we must be attentive to the role of ideologies in the selection and presentation of knowledge concerning the Holocaust in textbooks, in teaching, and in the media. The construction of knowledge about the Holocaust in classrooms is a relational process of meaning-making in which the cultures, perspectives and experiences of all involved come into play. For these reasons, the authors argue, Holocaust education should be considered in light of other fundamental questions, including the relationship of history, memory and identity in order to understand its actual and potential role in fostering democratic citizenship.
This research study was conducted by the UCL Centre for Holocaust Education, an integral part of UCL’s Institute of Education – currently ranked as the world’s leading university for education. It is the world’s largest ever study of its kind, drawing on the contributions of more than 9,500 students across all years of secondary school in England (i.e. 11 to 18 year olds). This report presents analysis of survey responses from 7,952 students and focus group interviews with 244 students. The primary aim of the research was to provide a detailed national portrait of students’ knowledge and understanding of the Holocaust. The research also focused on students’ attitudes towards learning about the Holocaust and their encounters with this history, both in and outside of school. Ultimately, the research sought to establish an empirical basis from which considerations of the most effective ways to improve teaching and learning about the Holocaust could be made.
The way people think about the Holocaust is changing. The particular nature of the transformation depends on people’s historical perspectives and how they position themselves and their nation or community vis-à-vis the tragedy. Understandably, European Muslims perceive the Holocaust as less central to their history than do other Europeans. Yet while the acknowledgement and commemoration of the horrors of the Holocaust are increasingly important in Europe, Holocaust denial and biased views on the Holocaust are widespread in European Muslims’ countries of origin. In this book, a number of distinguished scholars and educators of various backgrounds discuss views of the Holocaust. Problematic views are often influenced by a persistent attitude of Holocaust denial which is derived, in part, from discourses in the Muslim communities in their countries of origin. The essays collected here explore the backgrounds of these perceptions and highlight positive approaches and developments. Many of the contributions were written by people working in the field and reflecting on their experiences. This collection also reveals that problematic views of the Holocaust are not limited to Muslim communities.
Jewish Historical Studies, 2020
This article has been peer reviewed through the journal's standard double blind peer-review, where both the reviewers and authors are anonymised during review.
In: Novis-Deutsch, N. S., Lederman, S., Adams, T. & Kochavi, A. J. (2023). Sites of Tension: Shifts in Holocaust memory in Relation to Antisemitism and Political Contestation in Europe. Haifa: The Weiss-Livnat International Center for Holocaust Research and Education, p. 298-317.
This work addresses how public and private attitudes toward the Holocaust and Holocaust survivors in the United States may have influenced the way in which the survivors viewed themselves and their relations with others. It seems that both ‘public’ and ‘private’ attitudes toward the Holocaust and its survivors in America impeded a better understanding of the Holocaust and the survivor experience. Further, the above may have – in fact – adversely affected the adult psychological development of the survivors. Finally, an alternative explication of the dynamics underlying the attitudes examined here will be presented that can contribute to a more correct and beneficial way of approaching survivors of events producing similar psychological manifestations as the Holocaust.
Political Psychology
This research tested whether chronic or contextually activated Holocaust exposure is associated with more extreme political attitudes among Israeli Jews. Study 1 (N 5 57), and Study 2 (N 5 61) found that Holocaust primes increased support for aggressive policies against a current adversary and decreased support for political compromise via an amplified sense of identification with Zionist ideology. These effects, however, were obtained only under an exclusive but not an inclusive framing of the Holocaust. Study 3 (N 5 152) replicated these findings in a field study conducted around Holocaust Remembrance Day and showed that the link between Holocaust exposure, ideological identification, and militancy also occurs in real-life settings. Study 4 (N 5 867) demonstrated in a nationally representative survey that Holocaust survivors and their descendants exhibited amplified existential threat responses to contemporary political violence, which were associated with militancy and opposition to peaceful compromises. Together, these studies illustrate the Holocaustization of Israeli political cognitions 70 years later.
Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1995
This paper discusses the complex attitudes of Israeli society and mental health professionals toward the survivors of the Nazi Holocaust. While the nascent state of Israel provided refuge for the Holocaust survivors and offered them a new identity and opportunity to rebuild their lives, it also demanded that they abnegate their former identities, their Holocaust experiences above all, and repress all the emotional problems that the Holocaust created. In the nearly 5 decades since the first survivors arrived on Israel's shores with their accounts of barely imaginable horror, society's attitudes toward the survivors have traced a tortured course, throughout which the views of the helping professions have mirrored, rather than led, those of the general public. This paper describes the process of change in attitudes and attempts to explain this process.
2016
What new insights can social scientific methods uncover from material predominantly situated within the humanities—oral histories, in particular—and why might this methodological development be valuable for the greater interdisciplinary field of Holocaust (and Genocide) Studies? In this project, I use the videorecorded testimonies of the Shoah Foundation archive to create a testable and replicable theory about the influence of national rhetoric on memory. In particular, I research how and why the typical Soviet-Jewish Holocaust testimony is likely to differ from a non-Soviet—for example, Polish, French, or Hungarian—narrative of victimhood and oppression. I hypothesize that national rhetoric impacts memory, in particular the memory of child survivors that remained in the Soviet Union until its collapse. The mechanism that links national rhetoric to memory is the socialization, or assimilation, that these young people experienced during their formative postwar years. I suggest that these factors—national rhetoric, socialization, and assimilation—lead child survivors to recall those who helped or harmed them in a particular manner. To operationalize my study, I developed a code to trace the confluence of proper nouns and strong emotional responses in videotaped survivor testimonies. I chose videotaped testimonies, as opposed to written or audio testimonies, as the presence of metadata (namely: silences, facial reactions, and body language) is most observable with this medium. In this preliminary test of my methodology, I began with survivors born in Minsk, who remained there after the war, but intend to expand my analysis to other cities that demonstrate assimilative variation throughout the post-Soviet region. In addition to the empirical portion of this research, I also address the potential ethical problems in quantifying sensitive archival material. By reading oral testimonies as both text and a response to text, I demonstrate patterns in how this group of Soviet-Jewish survivors uniquely remembers their own childhood, wartime experiences. Ideally, this method could not only reinforce, objectively and systematically, our current hypotheses about history and memory, but could also generate new theories that scholars may have overlooked.
PROSPECTS, 2010
This article examines Holocaust education in secondary school social science textbooks around the world since 1970, using data coded from 465 textbooks from 69 countries. It finds that books and countries more connected to world society and with an accompanying emphasis on human rights, diversity in society and a depiction of international, rather than national, society are more likely to discuss the Holocaust. Additionally, textbooks from Western countries contain more discussion of the Holocaust, although the rate is increasing in Eastern European and other non-Western countries, suggesting eventual convergence. We also find a shift in the nature of discussion, from a historical event to a violation of human rights or crime against humanity. These findings broadly support the arguments of neo-institutional theories that the social and cultural realms of the contemporary world are increasingly globalized and that notions of human rights are a central feature of world society.
Israel Studies, 2003
Until the 1960s, many scholars assert, most Americans' awareness of the Holocaust was based upon vague, trivial, or inaccurate representations. Yet the extermination of the Jews was remembered in significant ways, this article posits, through World War II accounts, the Nuremberg trials, philosophical works, comparisons with Soviet totalitarianism, Christian and Jewish theological reflections, pioneering scholarly publications, and mass-media portrayals. These early postwar attempts to comprehend the Jewish tragedy within prevailing cultural paradigms provided the foundation for subsequent understandings of that event.
Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2006
Interviews with 29 Holocaust survivors indicate wide variation in degree of aversion to Germans and activities associated with Germany. For some survivors, aversion is limited to those closest to the Nazi perpetrators; for others aversion includes anyone with German ancestry and any situation or product linked to contemporary Germany. This wide range of aversion following horrific experiences is not easily explained by known psychological mechanisms, and has important implications for understanding and ameliorating ethnopolitical conflict. Possible sources of variation in aversion are explored with measures of personality differences and differences in Holocaust experience. Results indicate that degree of trauma during the Holocaust is not significantly related to aversion, and that strong predictors of aversion are degree of blame of Germans not directly involved in the Holocaust, religiosity, and German origin. Aversion to Germans is strongly related to aversion to contemporary Arabs and Muslims.
Témoigner. Entre histoire et mémoire, 2016
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.