Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Twenty three thinkers, activists, writers, and artists convened at the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest beside the Blue River to develop and document a new environmental ethic. This group was dubbed the Blue River Quorum. Members of the Quorum and signers of the Blue River Declaration are: J. Baird Callicott, Madeline Cantwell, Alison Hawthorne Deming, Kristie Dotson, Charles Goodrich, Patricia Hasbach, Mark Hixon, Jennifer Michael Hecht, Robin Wall Kimmerer, Katie McShane, Kathleen Dean Moore, Nalini Nadkarni, Michael P. Nelson, Harmony Paulsen, Devon G. Pena, Libby Roderick, Kim Stanley Robinson, Fred Swanson, Bron Taylor, Allen Thompson, Kyle Powys Whyte, Priscilla Solis Ybarra, Gretel Van Wieren, and Jan Zwicky.
Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 2012
, a group of environmental thinkers-ecologists, philosophers, foresters, poets and novelists, religious and environmental studies specialists, and indigenous traditions experts-met with the audacious goal to write coUaboratively a new ethic. The result was a statement of conscience that drew on the collective wisdom of the assembled group about the human place in and responsibilities to the biosphere and its diverse and interconnected living systems. The ethic was named the Blue River Declaration for the river in Oregon's Cascade Mountain Range where it was crafted. The Declaration arose from a conviction that our species has precipitated an environmental and social catastrophe, through a complex mix of imprudent and unethical behaviors, and which have been justified, reinforced, and perhaps even directly precipitated, by ignorant, mistaken, outdated, and unethical ideas. Of course, times of social crisis have historically generated statements of conscience that condemn conditions, events, or trends considered pernicious, and which call for new ethical principles or moral virtues and corresponding actions, in ways that their authors hope will promote a more just and cooperative society. In 1934, for example, the Barmen Declaration was written by leaders of the 'Confessing Church' of Germany, Christians who opposed National Socialism and its many
Environmental Ethics, 2012
International Society For Environmental Ethics Vol. 23, No. 3 Winter 2012 ISSN 2224-8250
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2009
Environmental virtue ethics (EVE) first got off the ground in 1983, with Thomas Hill, Jr.'s ''Ideals of human excellence and preserving natural environments.'' Hill suggested that rather than trying to prove nature's intrinsic value or justify nonhuman rights, we might develop an environmental ethics by asking, in the face of environmentally destructive behavior: what kind of a person would do that? And: what kinds of persons will we become if we do likewise? Or perhaps EVE really started in 1853, with publication of Henry Thoreau's (1971) Walden, which lays out an approach to life focused on ''plain living and high thinking'' and connection to nature. It explicitly contrasts such a life with the materialism that has subsequently gotten us into so much environmental trouble. ''When [a person] has obtained those things which are necessary to life,'' Thoreau reminds us, ''there is another alternative than to obtain the superfluities; and that is, to adventure on life now, his vacation from humbler toil having commenced.'' Unless, of course, EVE started in the mid-Fourth century BC, with the composition of Aristotle's Politics: ''Since one should take thought for the health of the [city's] inhabitants, this consists in the location being finely situated…and second, in using healthy sorts of water, and making this more than an incidental concern; for the things we use most of and most often for the body are what contribute most to health, and the capacity of waters and wind has such a nature'' (book 7, chapter 11). Or perhaps it began a century or so earlier, half a world away, in the sayings eventually collected in the Tao Te Ching, with their emphasis on nondoing (wu wei) and acceptance of the world as it is: Oh, for a small country with few people! …Although there exist boats and carriages, they have no occasion to ride in them.
Minding Nature is published electronically by the Center for Humans and Nature, an independent, non-partisan, and non-profit organization. The Center's mission is to explore and promote human responsibilities to nature--the whole community of life.
Nature no longer runs the Earth. We do. It is our choice what happens from here (Lynas, 2011, 8).
2007
We are very, very fortunate to have Dr. Rolston with us today. Since 1975, Dr. Rolston has been writing about the religious imperative to respect nature. Dr. Rolston is an avid backpacker, a field naturalist, a bryologist—that's the study of mosses, correct? He spent his childhood summers exploring the woods of Virginia and the swamps of Alabama where he was raised and it was there that he developed a passion for the wonders of nature. Dr. Rolston became alarmed about how quickly the natural world was changing and being lost to pressures from humanity, such as development. He has also said he feels he has learned as much directly from nature as from any scholar. However, this particular scholar's passion for ethics and nature raises our collective consciousness, allowing us the full sense of urgency in thinking about our environment, protecting our environment, and addressing the myriad issues that make nature so complicated and so fascinating. With that I'd like you to ...
Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers, 1999
Beauty is the symbol of morality, according to Immanuel Kant. We interpret this to imply that by achieving aesthetic pleasure, humankind can somehow replace the need for ethical satisfaction. We apply this idea to the project of constructing scenic waterways in urban areas, and ask "What purpose is served by organizing debris removal along the channels and banks of polluted urban waterways if they become aesthetically pleasing but remain nearly devoid of life?" A footnote to recent scientific research that measures the effect of woody debris on stream channel processes reveals that woody debris contributes to aquatic habitat. Adding woody debris to a stream can create protected zones and improve fish habitat by increasing pool types and sizes, sediment storage, and local scour We discuss this current research and its implications in the changing contexts of American history and environmental ethics. The systematic removal of natural woody "snags" (for example the spectacular "Great Raft" on the Red River) that helped open the interior of the United States to commerce once fit the prevailing public morality of American Manifest Destiny Today, Americans who can find little ethical satisfaction in the condition of their urban waterways yet strive to make them scenic. We explore the scenic and recreational potentials for "treating" urban streams with the addition of woody debris m order to contribute to aquatic habitat. We also indulge m semantic games and ask why the debris must be woody m order to contribute. This leads to a provocative discussion about wooden pallets, shopping carts, and automobile tires. Perhaps debris removal in urban waterways disrupts and diminishes aquatic habitat, yet results in an aesthetic pleasure that helps make our ethical dissatisfaction with polluted rivers and streams more palatable. If so, the social construction of scenic urban waterways is just an aesthetic movement driven by a political desire for utopia (David Nemeth's co-author is Dr. Deborah J. Keirsey).
Science Advisory Board of the International Joint Commission, 1991
Ocean & Coastal Management, 1992
Environmental Values, 2015
Environmental Values Environmental Values is an international peer-reviewed journal that brings together contributions from philosophy, economics, politics, sociology, geography, anthropology, ecology and other disciplines, which relate to the present and future environment of human beings and other species. In doing so we aim to clarify the relationship between practical policy issues and more fundamental underlying principles or assumptions.
2020
Giving legal rights to nature is no longer a fringe idea in international environmental law. Rights of Nature movements have gained traction in countries around the world, including Ecuador, Australia, India, Aotearoa New Zealand, and the United States. The act of organizing to recognize legal rights and legal personhood for nature represents a philosophical, moral, and political shift from previous anthropocentric values. Through two case studies in Aotearoa New Zealand and the United States, this thesis examines the policy language and the context and history that led to their creation. The Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act and the Lake Erie Bill of Rights are two examples of movements and policies that created legal rights for a natural entity, a river, and a lake, respectively. My analysis of these two unique case studies illustrates some of the elements necessary for such policies to be implemented and enforced effectively: careful consideration of the local ...
Colum. J. Envtl. L., 2003
for their generosity in reviewing and commenting on it and for their encouragement. Phillip Moffat, Njeri Marekia, and Kelli Biferie provided able research assistance at various stages in the development of these ideas.
2013
for their generosity in reviewing and commenting on it and for their encouragement. Phillip Moffat, Njeri Marekia, and Kelli Biferie provided able research assistance at various stages in the development of these ideas.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.