Academia.eduAcademia.edu

(In)Visible Publics: Television and Participatory Culture in India

Abstract

The little black-ink rubber-stamp I discovered sometime in the early 1990s had two Bengali words for designation: 'Betar Srota' (Radio Listener). Proudly displayed by the rightful user, a paan-shop owner in the southern fringe of Calcutta, this text used to appear below his signature in every letter he wrote to All India Radio's Calcutta station, particularly to Vividh Bharati. Apart from being an indicator of popularity of radio in the heydays of public television in India, this is also a testimony of how the Subject interacting with media constitutes its identity. Such personalisation may be rare but it hints towards the myriad histories of participatory culture in India and their various relations with the personal, the private and the public. In this essay I seek to understand some of them with a view to roughly propose a critical agenda for studies in lndian participatory cultures. I try to demonstrate how earlier forms of audience engagement with radio and TV help us understand 'participatory culture' -- interactivity, participation, mobilization -- around particularly Reality TV.

Key takeaways

  • Television and participatory culture in India
  • Extending this argument, I have suggested on another occasion (Roy 2014) that the ABHIJIT ROY (IN)VISIBLE PUBLICS demise of the form of 'discrete programming' (the modern realist mode I have referred above) and the simultaneous rise of the flow form on Indian television, a process gaining impetus between 1982 and 1991, did create a space for mass identification with television and therefore participatory culture around it.
  • But, more importantly, it showed the growing anxiety of the Indian state over the appropriation of a nationwide participatory culture by agencies other than the Indian state.
  • Hindi film once again came to play the role of a crucial unifying force behind participatory culture.
  • Indian society is becoming a television society in more than one sense.