Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Still Moving Against the Day: Pynchon's Graphic Impulse

Abstract

In the photographic technique of contre-jour, the camera is pointed directly at a source of light. The intervening figure is registered in sharp contrast that elides detail, concentrating the image on a play of borders that focuses on shape and line. In Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon employs contre-jour (and titles the novel as such) to stage an encounter between the visual and the literary. Sean Cubitt’s digital theory of the cinema is used in this essay to investigate the possibility of representation and effects sought by Against the Day’s Futurist painter and anarchist, Tancredi. Working in Venice, Tancredi rages against the “damnable stillness of paint” (AtD 586) in his efforts to create an Infernal Machine of destructive transformation. Three pictures by Luigi Russolo, René Magritte, and Umberto Boccioni currently hang in the Peggy Guggenheim Collection in Venice and resonate with Pynchon’s representation of visual culture and the work of Tancredi. Moving through these paintings and the Futurist and Cubist movements, the association between “wound culture” (Mark Seltzer) and photography is forged. The pataphysical and cinematic technology of the “Integroscope” then animates photography, (re)producing the Barthesian punctum that comes with the temporal aberrance of what Pynchon thematizes as “bilocation” (that is, being in two places at the same time). Akin to Walter Benjamin’s “optical unconscious,” what I call Pynchon’s “graphic impulse” plays out the tension between the moving and the still image. Further, the content and form of Pynchon’s representation of visual culture reveals the historio-graphy of his graphic impulse. His focus on other sensorial modes of apprehending the visual—smell and sound—complicates the encounter between the visual and the literary, coloring the ending of the Against the Day with a darker tone."