Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1995, Neonatology
…
12 pages
1 file
AI-generated Abstract
This study investigates how early feeding modes—breastfeeding versus formula feeding—influence body composition in infants during the critical period of growth in early infancy. While existing literature reports varied findings on how feeding modes affect weight gain and body fatness, this research aims to clarify these uncertainties by analyzing infant body composition using in vivo methods. The results indicate that formula-fed infants gain weight and exhibit different body composition patterns compared to breastfed infants, shedding light on the nutritional implications that early feeding practices have on infant growth and development.
Pediatric …, 1990
The energy intake, expenditure, and deposition of 40 breast-fed and formula-fed infants were investigated at 1 and 4 mo of age to explore possible differences in energy utilization between feeding groups. Energy intake was calculated from 5-d test-weighing records or pre-and postweighing of formula bottles, in combination with bomb calorimetry of the milks. Total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) was determined by the doubly labeled water method. Sleeping metabolic rate (SMR) and minimal observable energy expenditure were measured by indirect calorimetry. Activity was estimated as the difference between TDEE and SMR. Energy deposition was estimated from dietary intake and TDEE. Energy intakes were significantly higher for the formula-fed than breast-fed infants at 1 mo (118 f 17 versus 101 f 16 kcal/kg/d) and 4 mo (87 f 11 versus 72 2 9 kcal/kg/d) (p < 0.001). TDEE averaged 67 f 8 and 64 k 7 kcal/kg/d at 1 mo and 73 f 9 and 64 f 8 kcal/kg/d at 4 mo for the formula-fed and breast-fed infants, respectively, and differed between feeding groups (p < 0.04). SMR and minimal observable energy expenditure (kcallmin) were higher among the formula-fed infants at 1 and 4 mo (p < 0.005). The energy available for activity and the thermic effect of feeding did not differ between feeding groups. Rates of weight gain (g/ d) and energy deposition (kcal/kg/d) tended to be greater among the formula-fed infants at 1 and 4 mo (p < 0.06). Differences in weight gain, energy deposition, SMR, minimal observable energy expenditure, and TDEE partially accounted for the discrepancy in energy intake observed between breast-fed and formula-fed infants. The response to the varying levels of energy intake in infancy appear to be mediated through growth and basal-energy-requiring processes, but not through physical activity. (Pediatr Res 28: 631-640,1990) Abbreviations TDEE, total daily energy expenditure SMR, sleeping metabolic rate MOEE, minimal observable energy expenditure TEF, thermic effect of feeding
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000
Background: Currently available preterm formulas with energy contents of 3350 kJ (800 kcal)/L promote weight and length gain at rates at or above intrauterine growth rates but disproportionately increase total body fat. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether fat accretion in formula-fed, very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants could be decreased and net protein gain maintained by reducing energy intakes from 502 kJ (80 kcal) • kg Ϫ1 •d Ϫ1 [normal-energy (NE) formula] to 419 kJ (100 kcal) • kg Ϫ1 •d Ϫ1 [low-energy (LE) formula] while providing similar protein intakes (3.3 g • kg Ϫ1 •d Ϫ1). Design: The study was a randomized, controlled trial enrolling 20 appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) and 16 small-for-gestational-age (SGA) VLBW infants (mean birth weight: 1.1 kg; mean gestational age: 31 wk); energy expenditure and nutrient balance were measured at 4 wk of age and anthropometric measurements were made when infants weighed 2 kg. Results: The percentage of fat in newly formed tissue was significantly lower in AGA infants fed the LE formula (n = 9) than in those fed the NE formula (n = 10) (9% compared with 23%; analysis of variance, P = 0.001). Energy expenditure was higher in AGA infants fed the NE formula than in those fed the LE formula. Skinfold thickness was markedly lower in AGA infants fed the LE formula than in those fed the NE formula, resulting in a lower estimated percentage body fat (8.0 ± 1.9% and 10.8 ± 3.5%, respectively; P < 0.05). Three of 6 SGA infants fed the LE formula were excluded during the study because of poor weight gain. Conclusions: Body composition can easily be altered by changing the energy intakes of formula-fed VLBW infants. Energy intakes in these infants should be > 419 kJ (100 kcal) • kg Ϫ1 • d Ϫ1 .
Acta Paediatrica, 2007
Human milk is often inadequate nutritionally for preterm infants. We investigated the effect of adding a commercially prepared milk fortifier to human (maternal or bank) milk and measured changes in lower leg length velocity (LLLvel) using knemometry, weight gain and biochemical indices of nutrition. Babies were allocated to one of three feed groups, in a semi-randomized fashion, to receive human milk alone (group I), fortified human milk (group II) or a preterm formula (group III). The birthweights (median and R) and birth gestations (median and R) of the three groups were as follows: group I 1099 g (654-1248 g) and 28 wk (26-32 wk); group II 838 g (742-1340 g) and 31 wk (28-36); group III 1136 g (624-1552 g) and 32 wk (27-36 wk). All babies who received fortified milk either showed significant (p = 0. 0004) acceleration in LLLvel during the period studied, or maintained their pre-study period velocity. This increase in LLLvel was comparable to that achieved by a group of babies given a standard preterm infant formula (p`0.001). By comparison, the control group's change in LLLvel was more modest (p = 0.04). Babies who received human milk with the fortifier added had the lowest serum levels of alkaline phosphatase at the end of the study period when compared to the other two groups. Other biochemical indices were similar in the three feed groups. No adverse clinical events were encountered which could be attributed to the use of the breast milk fortifier. & Fortifier, human milk, knemometry, lower leg length velocity
British Journal of Nutrition, 2021
Type of feeding during early life influences growth trajectory and metabolic risk at later ages. Modifications in infant formula composition have led to evaluate their effects on growth and energetic efficiency (EE) compared with breast-feeding. Main goal was to analyse type of feeding potential effects during first months of life, plus its EE, on growth patterns in healthy formula fed (standard infant formula (SF) vs. experimental infant formula enriched with bioactive nutrients (EF)) and breastfed (BF) infants participating in the COGNIS RCT (http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02094547) up to 18 months of age. Infants follow-up to 18 months of age (n 141) fed with a SF (n 48), EF(n 56), or BF (n 37), were assessed for growth parameters using WHO standards. Growth velocity (GV) and catch-up were calculated to identify growth patterns. EE of breast milk/infant formula was also estimated. Infants’ growth at 6 months showed higher length and lower head circumference gains i...
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Currently available preterm formulas with energy contents of 3350 kJ (800 kcal)/L promote weight and length gain at rates at or above intrauterine growth rates but disproportionately increase total body fat. The objective of this study was to determine whether fat accretion in formula-fed, very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants could be decreased and net protein gain maintained by reducing energy intakes from 502 kJ (80 kcal)*kg(-)(1)*d(-)(1) [normal-energy (NE) formula] to 419 kJ (100 kcal)*kg(-)(1)*d(-)(1) [low-energy (LE) formula] while providing similar protein intakes (3.3 g*kg(-)(1)*d(-)(1)). The study was a randomized, controlled trial enrolling 20 appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) and 16 small-for-gestational-age (SGA) VLBW infants (mean birth weight: 1.1 kg; mean gestational age: 31 wk); energy expenditure and nutrient balance were measured at 4 wk of age and anthropometric measurements were made when infants weighed 2 kg. The percentage of fat in newly formed tissue was ...
Journal of Pediatrics, 1983
Banked human milk has been widely used, although its composition and nutritional adequacy for preterm infants are uncertain. We randomized 76 healthy infants of <--1500 gm birth weight to ad lib feedings of frozen BHM or a protein-mineral-calorie-enriched formula (Similac Special Care) designed to sustain intrauterine accretion rates," BHM contained 2.2 gm fat/lO0 ml and 60 kcal/lO0 ml (gross energy). Infants fed BHM ingested more milk (197 vs 165 ml/kg/day) but less gross energy (118 vs 143 kcal/kg/day); grew less rapidly in weight (15 vs 30 gin/day), length (0.7 vs 1.1 cm/wk), and head circumference (0.8 vs 1.2 cm/wk}; and were discharged at a lower weight (2200 vs 2348 gin) and older age (61 vs 47 day) than infants fed formula (P < 0.02). At 37 weeks'postmenstrual age, infants fed BHM were less responsive to Brazelton inanimate stimuli (mean total score 5.0 vs 7.5; P < 0.02). With few exceptions, blood amino acids, pH, and serum electrolyte values were similar in both groups. The different caloric intake of our feeding groups may explain only part of the large difference in growth rate. Donor milk should not be fed to preterm infants unless it has been analyzed and the feedings shown to provide a nutrient intake considered appropriate to the needs of these infants. (J PEOIArR 103:95, 1983)
Clinical Nutrition, 2013
Protein source, macronutrient composition and content of long chain-polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA) of infant formulae may influence infant growth. We aimed to assess the effect of a modified infant formula on growth. In a randomized, double-blind trial, 213 healthy term infants consumed isoenergetic study formulae (intervention formula - IF, control formula - CF) from the first month of life until the age of 120 days. IF (1.89 g protein/100 kcal) contained α-lactalbumin (ALAB) and LC-PUFA, while CF (2.30 g protein/100 kcal) provided standard whey and no LC-PUFA. Anthropometry and dietary intake were regularly assessed. A venous blood sample was obtained on day 120. Both formulae were well-accepted without significant differences in health related observations. Weight gain was not statistically different between formula groups (IF: 30.2 ± 6.3 vs. CF: 28.3 ± 6.5 g/day, mean ± SD, P = 0.06). Length gain was higher in IF (0.11 ± 0.02 vs. 0.10 ± 0.02 cm/day, P = 0.02). Energy intake from formula was higher in CF at 90 and 120 days (IF: 509 ± 117 and 528 ± 123 vs. CF: 569 ± 152 and 617 ± 169 kcal/day, P &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt; 0.01). Protein intake in CF was significantly higher at each assessment. Growth per energy intake was higher in IF compared to CF for weight (6.45 ± 2.01 vs. 5.67 ± 2.21 g/100 kcal, P = 0.02) and length (0.23 ± 0.08 vs. 0.20 ± 0.08 mm/100 kcal, P = 0.04). The modified infant formula with reduced protein content with added ALAB and LC-PUFA, meets infant requirements of protein for adequate growth. The increased energetic efficiency of the new infant formula might result from improved protein composition by added ALAB. Apparently minor differences in composition can markedly affect energetic efficiency for growth. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01094080).
The Journal of Pediatrics, 1984
Nutrient balance, energy utilization, and composition of weight gain in very-low-birth.weight infants fed pooled human milk or a preterm formula Growth, protein, and energy balances were studied in two groups of very-low-birth-weight premature infants fed pooled pasteurized human milk (HM) or a preterm formula (PF). Each infant was studied at 33 and 36 weeks gestational age with a combined technique of nutrient balance and indirect calorimetry measurement. Weight and length gains were higher with PF than with HM, but head circumference growth was similar with both milks. Although the volume of milk given was lower, energy intake Was higher with PF than with HM in both studies (126 to 130 vs 103 to 109 kcal/kg/day).
Nutrition Journal, 2011
Objective: To determine the effects of high dietary protein and energy intake on the growth and body composition of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Study design: Thirty-eight VLBW infants whose weights were appropriate for their gestational ages were assessed for when they could tolerate oral intake for all their nutritional needs. Thirty-two infants were included in a longitudinal, randomized clinical trial over an approximate 28-day period. One control diet (standard preterm formula, group A, n = 8, 3.7 g/kg/d of protein and 129 kcal/kg/d) and two high-energy and high-protein diets (group B, n = 12, 4.2 g/kg/d and 150 kcal/kg/d; group C, n = 12, 4.7 g/kg/d and 150 kcal/kg/d) were compared. Differences among groups in anthropometry and body composition (measured with bioelectrical impedance analysis) were determined. An enriched breast milk group (n = 6) served as a descriptive reference group. Results: Groups B and C displayed greater weight gains and higher increases in fat-free mass than group A. Conclusion: An intake of 150 kcal/kg/d of energy and 4.2 g/kg/d of protein increases fat-free mass accretion in VLBW infants.
Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2020
BACKGROUND: Breast milk (BM) is the main nutritional source for newborns before they are capable to eat and consume other foods. BM has carbohydrates, lipids, complex proteins, and other biologically active components which have a direct effect on infant growth. AIM: The aim of the study was to correlate anthropometric data of the infant to macronutrients in BM (fat, protein, and carbohydrates) and to find some modifiable issues affecting macronutrient contents of BM for the benefits of upcoming infants. METHODS: One hundred breastfeeding mothers participated in the study, they were recruited from the outpatient clinic, El Demerdash Hospital, Ain Shams University, from September 2019, to December 2019. BM was expressed by an electric pump, macronutrient content was assessed. Anthropometric data of the babies and mothers were obtained, gestational age, parity, age of the women, and the route of birth were recorded. RESULTS: For the macronutrients content of milk, a positive significa...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Nutrients, 2016
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2008
Acta Paediatrica, 2007
The Journal of Pediatrics, 1987
Current Developments in Nutrition, 2019
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 2011
The Journal of Pediatrics, 1988
Early Human Development, 1997
International Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health, 2016
Early Human Development, 1994