Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
9 pages
1 file
The review of "Making Archaeology Happen. Design versus Dogma" explores the dual nature of archaeology as both a scientific discipline and an art form. It discusses the tension between academic research and commercial practices, advocating for a unified approach to strengthen archaeological practices through design. The author emphasizes the need for social engagement and ethics in archaeology, highlighting not only the knowledge produced by the discipline but also the social value inherent in the archaeological process.
2014
Archaeology is not merely the study of antiquity through the systematic discovery, colleting and documenting of ancient things. It is also the appreciation and interpretation of things and their agency which shed light on the character and dynamics of past (and present) societies.
Archaeological Dialogues, 2006
European Journal of Archaeology, 2013
Sub chapters in 'The discipline of archaeology': What is archaeology?, What archaeologists do and where they work, Avenues of discovery: how archaeological finds are recovered, Archaeological contexts and categories: how finds are classified, Roads to knowlöedge: how archaeological documentation is stored and retrieved, The changing nature of archaeology - between history and anthropology, the humanities and science, Approaches to interpretation,The politics and ethics of archaeology: between ideology, heritage and academia, The future of archaeology. Appendix: definitions of archaeology.
Current Swedish Archaeology, 2021
2013
This review offers a critical appraisal of key arguments advanced in the book "Making Archaeology Happen: Design versus Dogma" by Prof Martin Carver.
AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology, 2016
Antiquity, 2019
Current archaeological practice in the UK and elsewhere focuses on the collection of empirical data. While scholars have proposed theoretical advances in field techniques, very few of these methods have been adopted in commercial archaeology. A combination of increased time pressure on development projects and the conservatism of the sector contribute to challenging times for archaeological practice. Additional complexity is introduced by large-scale infrastructure projects unsuited to standardised field techniques. This article explores these issues, calling for a flexible, consultative approach to project design and implementation, to ensure the longevity of both archaeology and the archaeological profession.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Open Archaeology, 2022
European Journal of Archaeology, 2014
Archeological Papers of the …, 2003