Avian surrogates in terrestrial ecosystems: theory and practice

Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012

1. Most biodiversity is still unknown, and therefore, priority areas for conservation typically are identified based on the presence of surrogates, or indicator groups. Birds are commonly used as surrogates of biodiversity owing to the wide availability of relevant data and their broad popular appeal. However, some studies have found birds to perform relatively poorly as indicators. We therefore ask how the effectiveness of this approach can be improved by supplementing data on birds with information on other taxa. 2. Here, we explore two strategies using (i) species data for other taxa and (ii) genus-and familylevel data for invertebrates (when available). We used three distinct species data sets for sub-Saharan Africa, Denmark and Uganda, which cover different spatial scales, biogeographic regions and taxa (vertebrates, invertebrates and plants). 3. We found that networks of priority areas identified on the basis of birds alone performed well in representing overall species diversity where birds were relatively speciose compared to the other taxa in the data sets. Adding species data for one taxon increased surrogate effectiveness better than adding genus-and family-level data. It became apparent that, while adding species data for other taxa increased overall effectiveness, predicting the best-performing additional taxon was difficult. Finally, we demonstrate that increasing overall effectiveness required supplementary data for several additional taxa. 4. Synthesis and applications. Good surrogates of biodiversity are necessary to help identify conservation areas that will be effective in preventing species extinctions. Birds perform fairly well as surrogates in cases where birds are relatively speciose, but overall effectiveness will be improved by adding additional data from other taxa, in particular from range-restricted species. Conservation solutions with focus on birds as biodiversity surrogate could therefore benefit from also incorporating species data from other taxa.

Ecosphere, 2015

Using surrogate species to monitor the status of target biodiversity in areas undergoing exceptional habitat loss requires extending the traditional assessment of surrogates for taxonomic diversity to validating surrogates for functional diversity. This validation will be critical to inform about broader ecosystem processes and stability. We compared the surrogacy reliability of the habitat-specialist Rufouslegged Owl (Strix rufipes) and the habitat-generalist Austral Pygmy-Owl (Glaucidium nana), and we examined potential underlying mechanisms for surrogacy relationships in Andean temperate forests, a global biodiversity hotspot in southern Chile. During 2011–2013, we conducted 1,145 owl surveys, 505 vegetation surveys, and 505 avian point-transect surveys across 101 sites comprising a range of conditions from degraded forest habitat to structurally complex old-growth forest stands. The habitat-specialist S. rufipes was a reliable surrogate for all avian biodiversity measures, including avian endemism and functional diversity measures (degree of community specialization and density of large-tree users, understory users, and cavity-nesters). On the contrary, the habitat-generalist G. nana did not function as a surrogate. With increasing occurrence of S. rufipes, the density of target specialized biodiversity (species, guilds, and communities) increased nonlinearly and peaked at the least degraded sites. This specialist aggregation might be driven by stand structural complexity available in older, more stable, forests. These results suggest that management actions tailored to promote occurrence of habitat-specialist owls, such as the S. rufipes, may result in enhanced density of endemic species, specialized communities, and likely ecosystem stability.

PLOS ONE, 2014

A holy grail of conservation is to find simple but reliable measures of environmental change to guide management. For example, particular species or particular habitat attributes are often used as proxies for the abundance or diversity of a subset of other taxa. However, the efficacy of such kinds of species-based surrogates and habitat-based surrogates is rarely assessed, nor are different kinds of surrogates compared in terms of their relative effectiveness. We use 30-year datasets on arboreal marsupials and vegetation structure to quantify the effectiveness of: (1) the abundance of a particular species of arboreal marsupial as a species-based surrogate for other arboreal marsupial taxa, (2) hollow-bearing tree abundance as a habitat-based surrogate for arboreal marsupial abundance, and (3) a combination of species- and habitat-based surrogates. We also quantify the robustness of species-based and habitat-based surrogates over time. We then use the same approach to model overall species richness of arboreal marsupials. We show that a species-based surrogate can appear to be a valid surrogate until a habitat-based surrogate is co-examined, after which the effectiveness of the former is lost. The addition of a species-based surrogate to a habitat-based surrogate made little difference in explaining arboreal marsupial abundance, but altered the co-occurrence relationship between species. Hence, there was limited value in simultaneously using a combination of kinds of surrogates. The habitat-based surrogate also generally performed significantly better and was easier and less costly to gather than the species-based surrogate. We found that over 30 years of study, the relationships which underpinned the habitat-based surrogate generally remained positive but variable over time. Our work highlights why it is important to compare the effectiveness of different broad classes of surrogates and identify situations when either species- or habitat-based surrogates are likely to be superior.

The correlation between vegetation patterns (species distribution and richness) and altitudinal variation has been widely reported for tropical forests, thereby providing theoretical basis for biodiversity conservation. However, this relationship may have been oversimplified, as many other factors may influence vegetation patterns, such as disturbances, topography and geographic distance. Considering these other factors, our primary question was: is there a vegetation pattern associated with substantial altitudinal variation (10-1,093 m a.s.l.) in the Atlantic Rainforest-a top hotspot for biodiversity conservation-and, if so, what are the main factors driving this pattern? We addressed this question by sampling 11 1-ha plots, applying multivariate methods, correlations and variance partitioning. The Restinga (forest on sandbanks along the coastal plains of Brazil) and a lowland area that was selectively logged 40 years ago were floristically isolated from the other plots. The maximum species richness ([200 spp. per hectare) occurred at approximately 350 m a.s.l. (submontane forest). Gaps, multiple stemmed trees, average elevation and the standard deviation of the slope significantly affected the vegetation pattern. Spatial proximity also influenced the vegetation pattern as a structuring environmental variable or via dispersal constraints. Our results clarify, for the first time, the key variables that drive species distribution and richness across a large altitudinal range within the Atlantic Rainforest.

The effects of habitat loss and fragmentation in tropical forests are difficult to separate, as they usually occur concurrently. In the state park La Sierra, in Tabasco, Mexico, the rainforest is being cleared for pasture, and fragments are being used by local inhabitants. This study examined the response of bird feeding guilds to habitat characteristics, including human disturbance, in five fragments of different sizes (1 * 4,500 ha, 2 * 150 ha, and 2 * 80 ha). Using point count observations, 125 species were recorded and were grouped into 11 feeding guilds. As expected, the largest fragment had higher species richness and abundances than the smaller fragments. However, five habitat features differed significantly among fragment sizes, including tree density, the number of tree stumps and the number of trails. Thus the larger fragment was also less disturbed. Fragment size alone was significant only for scavenger species richness, and for the abundance of bark gleaning insectivores and insectivore/nectarivores. Raptors were more diverse and abundant in the large fragment and less disturbed sites. Arboreal frugivores and bark or foliage gleaning insectivores, depended on higher trees and less disturbed sites. A better understanding of the mechanisms that affect persistence is essential for the planning of conservation actions.

Conservation Biology, 2007

Biodiversity and Conservation, 2014

As the area of plantation forest expands worldwide and natural, unmanaged forests decline there is much interest in the potential for planted forests to provide habitat for biodiversity. In regions where little semi-natural woodland remains, the biodiversity supported by forest plantations, typically non-native conifers, may be particularly important. Few studies provide detailed comparisons between the species diversity of native woodlands which are being depleted and non-native plantation forests, which are now expanding, based on data collected from multiple taxa in the same study sites. Here we compare the species diversity and community composition of plants, invertebrates and birds in Sitka spruce-(Picea sitchensis-) dominated and Norway spruce-(Picea abies-) dominated plantations, which have expanded significantly in recent decades in the study area in Ireland, with that of oak-and ash-dominated semi-natural woodlands in the same area. The results show that species richness in spruce plantations can be as high as seminatural woodlands, but that the two forest types support different assemblages of species. In areas where non-native conifer plantations are the principle forest type, their role in the provision of habitat for biodiversity conservation should not be overlooked. Appropriate management should target the introduction of semi-natural woodland characteristics, and on the extension of existing semi-natural woodlands to maintain and enhance forest species diversity. Our data show that although some relatively easily surveyed groups, such as vascular plants and birds, were congruent with many of the other taxa when looking across all study sites, the similarities in response were not strong enough to warrant use of these Communicated by B.D. Hoffmann. taxa as surrogates of the others. In order to capture a wide range of biotic variation, assessments of forest biodiversity should either encompass several taxonomic groups, or rely on the use of indicators of diversity that are not species based.

Biological Conservation, 2015

Habitat loss and degradation have the potential to alter the species richness–functional diversity relationship decreasing both species richness and functional richness, and increasing functional biotic homogenization. These anthropogenic disturbances may have strong impacts on species-poor systemswith lowfunctional redundancy. We tested the species richness–functional diversity relationship and the potential effects of deforestation and degradation on functional diversity of avian assemblages in a Biodiversity Hotspot, in southern Chile. For 101 sites established across a disturbance gradient, we conducted 505 point-transect surveys to measure avian community structure, 505 vegetation plots to quantify stand-level structure, and measured deforestation at the landscape-level. We used three functional diversity indices for avian assemblages (functional richness, functional evenness, and community-weighted specialization as a measure of functional biotic homogenization). We found a non-saturating relationship between species richness and both functional richness and communityweighted specialization, suggesting low functional redundancy. We also found a non-significant decline of functional evenness indicating that when adding new species to the initial pool, functional redundancy increases slightly. Deforestation led to a decrease in both functional richness and community-weighted specialization, particularly precluding the persistence of specialized species in disturbed forests. Functional evenness did not vary with deforestation suggesting that the regularity of density distribution in filled niche volume may be relatively resilient to disturbance. However, the fact that community-weighted specialization decreased linearly under deforestation serves as evidence of functional biotic homogenization processes (“loser” specialists being replaced by “winner” generalist species) in a Biodiversity Hotspot.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2011