A Guide to Basic Exegesis
Charles L. Echols
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
AI
AI
This guide introduces the steps involved in conducting exegesis, defined as the process of drawing out the meaning from Scripture. It emphasizes a five-step process which includes textual criticism, understanding the author's intention, interpreting meaning, exploring theological implications, and applying findings. The paper underscores the importance of context and systematic methodology, while also addressing challenges in biblical studies and textual variations.
Related papers
Review of Naselli, Andrew David. How to Understand and Apply the New Testament: Twelve Steps from Exegesis to Theology. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R, 2017. Journal of Biblical and Theological Studies 5.1 (2020): 175–77.
Journal of Biblical and Theological Studies, 2020
In Pursuit of a Singular Text: New Testament Textual Criticism and the Desire for the True Original
'In Pursuit of a Singular Text' surveys developments in the field of New Testament textual criticism, exploring the underlying desire for a transcendent text that informs this work. In the nineteenth century, New Testament text critics and their rivals, defenders of a traditional or Byzantine Greek text, set out to restore the original and, therefore, true text of the New Testament. Identifying the original with long-lost autograph copies and assuming that a fixed, standardized text must form the basis of Christian faith, these scholars reinforced culturally specific notions of true text in order to restore the link between diverse, particular manifestations of text and the sacred, abstracted text of the New Testament. Yet, worries about textual corruption and claims about the necessity of correction are not exceptional or new, they are fundamental to the maintenance of a belief in a stable textual ground upon which interpretive claims can be legitimately based. Interpretation, especially interpretation of sacred texts, is often rooted in the fantasy that there is a transcendent text, which stands apart from any particular physical manifestation of that text (Dane 2003). In the case of texts sacred to Christians – transmitted for two millennia in every conceivable media, in multiple languages and across vast stretches of both time and space – faith in a transcendent text has required regular recapitulation and reconfiguration in light of historically situated challenges to textual authority and even to the very concept of 'sacred text'. Thus, each generation has produced its text critics, experts perceived to be capable of 'correcting' physical texts so that they conform more closely to a hypothetical trans-cendent text that is stable, fixed, and true in all its particulars. Malicious interpreters, ignorant copyists or other instruments of corruption dangerously threaten the text, or so it is claimed. Since the transcendent text is by definition hypothetical, however, such assertions suggest not that the pure text has been threatened but that a longed-for, imaginary link between available texts and the transcendent text has been challenged in some way. The precise content of the true text has always been, and will always be,
Old Testament exegesis: Reflections on methodology
HTS Theological Studies/Teologiese Studies, 2007
New testament methods 13(03)-
The task of biblical interpretation or exegesis is a daunting task. To exegete correctly, the context of a given pericope is vital for proper exegesis. Exegesis is not done in a vacuum; thus, text analysis methods have been developed over the years. New Testament text analysis has become an indispensable tool for interpreting and applying a particular text of the New Testament. Therefore, to decipher the original and or intended meaning of the author of any New Testament text, these methods are critical. This paper discusses New Testament methods of text analysis which are grouped majorly into critical and exegetical methods. Under critical methods, the paper provides a brief historical background of the New Testament, Historical Criticism, Form Criticism, Redaction Criticism, and Canon Criticism. The exegetical methods discussed in the paper are the
How to Understand and Apply the Old Testament: Twelve Steps from Exegesis to Theology (2017 excerpt)
P & R Publishing, 2017
This book is for anyone who wants to learn how to observe carefully, understand accurately, evaluate fairly, feel appropriately, act rightly, and express faithfully God's revealed Word, especially as embodied in the Old Testament. –Follow an extensively field-tested twelve-step process to deepen understanding and shape theology (biblical, systematic, and practical). –Engage with numerous illustrations from Scripture that model these interpretive steps. –Learn how to track an author's thought-flow, grasp the text's message, and apply the ancient Word in this modern world, all in light of Christ's redeeming work. Loaded with examples, practical answers, and recommended resources, the twelve chapters will empower believers to study, practice, and teach the Old Testament as CHRISTIAN Scripture, understanding and applying it in ways that nurture hope in the gospel and magnify the Messiah.
"From 'Original Text' to 'Initial Text': The Traditional Goal of New Testament Textual Criticism in Contemporary Discussion."
A brief introduction and a short digression (on the questions of "is the 'original text' an authoritative text?" and "is the 'original text' a privileged goal?") set up a survey of the meaning of the phrase "original text' in late 19th and 20th-century usage. A description and assessment of several contemporary proposals to redefine the goal(s) of NT (including Epp, Wachtel & Parker on the "initial text", Ellingworth, Trobisch, Swanson, Holmes, Parker, and [for the OT] Hendel) is followed by a discussion of some collateral issues (how early a text can TC recover; is it possible to recover an authorial text; and are the gospels the sort of texts that have originals). A survey of the philosophical and epistemological commitments that shape the practice of TC concludes the essay. Publication info: in The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, 2nd ed. (ed. by Bart D. Ehrman and Michael W. Holmes; NTTSD, 46; Brill, 2013 [November 2012] 637-688.
Elements of Biblical Exegesis: A Basic Guide for Students and Ministers, by Michael J. Gorman
Revue biblique 118.1 , 2011
Some Thoughts on Theological Exegesis of the Old Testament: Toward a Viable Model
biblicalstudies.org.uk
New Testament Textual Criticism:The Application of Thoroughgoing Principles
New Testament Textual Criticism:The Application of Thoroughgoing Principles, 2010
Factors that Affect the Methods and Results/Findings of Biblical Exegesis and Hermeneutics
Journal of AIIAS African Theological Association , 2012
The need for exegesis and hermeneutics to be more objective does not, of necessity, preclude subjectivity. This is because none of the modern readers approaches the Bible from a tabula rasa, "blank slate" perspective. On the contrary, every modern reader approaches the Bible with a certain degree of preconceived ideas, cultural orientations, and personal biases. In the end, what one perceives the Bible as saying tends to be coloured by these idiosyncrasies. In view of the foregoing, this study seeks to discuss the factors that affect the methods and results/findings of the exegesis and hermeneutics of the Bible texts. It also seeks to briefly illustrate how these factors operate in selected examples of issues and passages of Scripture. This paper employs the contextual method, allowing the contexts of the issues or Bible passages presented to determine how the various factors presented in the paper affect the exegesis and hermeneutics of the Bible.
New Testament Exegesis as an Academic Discipline with Relevance for Other Disciplines
Currents in Biblical Research, 2013
This English translation of a lecture delivered in November 2011 on the occasion of the author's installation as Professor of New Testament at Uppsala University (Kelhoffer 2012) addresses several conceptual and methodological questions about New Testament Exegesis, including: 'What is New Testament Exegesis?', 'What does it mean to call New Testament Exegesis an academic discipline?' and 'How can this discipline be relevant for other disciplines?' A central argument is that the current balkanization of biblical studies is undesirable and that scholars who use more traditional or newer methods should engage, rather than talk past, each other. It could help to foster that process if we attend to a misconception of the 'historical-critical method' as a single method. Additionally, 'the linguistic turn' holds promise for future discussions.
Related topics
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.